Consumer Product Safety Commission awards $101K contract for NEISS evaluations and trainings to SOMMER BRANDI J

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $101,378 ($101.4K)

Contractor: Sommer Brandi J

Awarding Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission

Start Date: 2023-08-16

End Date: 2026-09-25

Contract Duration: 1,136 days

Daily Burn Rate: $89/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NEISS EVALUATIONS AND TRAININGS: NEW AWARD

Place of Performance

Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20814

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Consumer Product Safety Commission obligated $101,377.52 to SOMMER BRANDI J for work described as: NEISS EVALUATIONS AND TRAININGS: NEW AWARD Key points: 1. The contract value appears to be on the lower end for professional services, suggesting a focused scope. 2. Competition dynamics for this award are not detailed, but the contract type indicates it was competed. 3. The fixed-price nature of the award helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. Performance is expected over approximately three years, aligning with typical training and evaluation cycles. 5. This contract falls within the 'Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' sector. 6. The award is a purchase order, a common mechanism for smaller value procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $101,377 for a three-year period for evaluations and trainings is modest. Without specific benchmarks for NEISS evaluations and trainings, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the fixed-price nature suggests a clear understanding of costs upfront. Compared to larger, multi-million dollar professional service contracts, this award appears to be for a specific, contained set of services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), indicating a competitive process for acquisitions below certain thresholds. While the exact number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally encourages competition among eligible vendors. This method aims to ensure fair pricing and access to a range of qualified providers for smaller procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: Competing this contract under SAP likely resulted in a fair market price for the government, avoiding the potential for higher costs associated with sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) staff who will receive training and whose evaluations will be conducted. The services delivered include professional, scientific, and technical support related to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). The geographic impact is primarily national, as NEISS data collection and analysis are a federal function. Workforce implications include the potential for enhanced skills and knowledge within the CPSC through the training provided.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data.
Limited insight into the specific expertise required for NEISS evaluations and trainings.
Potential for scope creep if the 'evaluations and trainings' are not precisely defined.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type helps control costs.
Awarded under a competitive procedure (SAP).
Clear period of performance (August 2023 - September 2026).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' industry code (NAICS 541990). This broad category encompasses a wide range of specialized services. The market for such services is diverse, with many firms offering expertise in areas like data analysis, program evaluation, and training. The CPSC's need for NEISS-related services is specific to its mission of ensuring product safety.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false) and does not explicitly mention subcontracting requirements for small businesses (sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within the Consumer Product Safety Commission. As a purchase order, it falls under standard federal procurement regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS)
Consumer Product Safety Commission Programs
Federal Training and Evaluation Services
Professional and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Contract performance risk due to lack of detailed contractor background.
Potential for inadequate scope definition leading to unmet needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Consumer Product Safety Commission awarded $101,377.52 to SOMMER BRANDI J. NEISS EVALUATIONS AND TRAININGS: NEW AWARD

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SOMMER BRANDI J.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $101,377.52.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-16. End: 2026-09-25.

What is the specific expertise of SOMMER BRANDI J in the area of NEISS evaluations and trainings?

The provided data does not detail the specific expertise or past performance of SOMMER BRANDI J. To assess this, one would need to review the contractor's proposal, past performance evaluations, and potentially their company profile or relevant project history. Understanding their experience with injury surveillance systems, data analysis, and training development would be crucial for evaluating their capability to successfully execute this contract. Without this information, it's assumed the CPSC conducted due diligence during the procurement process.

How does the $101,377 contract value compare to similar NEISS-related training and evaluation contracts?

Benchmarking this specific contract value is challenging without access to a comprehensive database of similar NEISS-related training and evaluation contracts. However, given the three-year performance period, the annual value is approximately $33,790. This suggests a relatively focused scope of work, potentially involving a limited number of training sessions or a specific evaluation project. Larger federal contracts for comprehensive program evaluations or extensive training rollouts often run into hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars, indicating this award is likely for a more specialized or contained task.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential underperformance by the contractor, scope creep, and the possibility that the training or evaluations may not meet the CPSC's specific needs. Mitigation strategies are primarily embedded in the contract structure. The fixed-price (FIRM FIXED PRICE) nature of the award helps control costs, as the contractor is responsible for any cost overruns. The defined period of performance (August 16, 2023, to September 25, 2026) sets clear timelines. The CPSC's oversight through the contracting officer and program managers is crucial for monitoring performance and ensuring deliverables meet requirements. Clear statement of work and acceptance criteria are also vital risk mitigation tools.

What is the historical spending pattern of the CPSC on NEISS evaluations and trainings?

The provided data only reflects this single new award. To understand historical spending patterns, one would need to query federal procurement databases (like FPDS) for previous contracts awarded by the CPSC specifically for NEISS evaluations and trainings, or for similar professional services related to injury surveillance. Analyzing past spending would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors frequently utilized, providing context for the current award's significance and potential future needs.

What is the potential impact of this contract on CPSC's ability to enhance product safety?

This contract directly supports the CPSC's mission by providing necessary evaluations and training related to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Effective NEISS data collection and analysis are crucial for identifying product-related injury trends, which in turn informs CPSC's regulatory actions, consumer education campaigns, and recalls. By ensuring the NEISS system is well-evaluated and personnel are adequately trained, this contract contributes to the accuracy and utility of the data, ultimately strengthening the CPSC's ability to protect consumers from unsafe products.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 880 W CIMARRON RD, AYR, NE, 68925

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $256,428

Exercised Options: $101,378

Current Obligation: $101,378

Actual Outlays: $85,820

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline