GSA awards $4.61B contract for stationery products, highlighting potential for long-term supply chain stability

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,610 ($4.6K)

Contractor: Document Imaging Dimensions Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-04

End Date: 2026-04-10

Contract Duration: 6 days

Daily Burn Rate: $768/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: PORTFOLIO

Place of Performance

Location: YORKVILLE, KENDALL County, ILLINOIS, 60560

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4,610.49 to DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC. for work described as: PORTFOLIO Key points: 1. The contract's substantial value suggests a significant demand for stationery products within the federal government. 2. Full and open competition indicates a healthy market with multiple potential suppliers vying for government business. 3. The fixed-price structure with economic price adjustment offers some protection against inflation while maintaining cost predictability. 4. A long performance period (6 months, with potential for extensions implied by BPA call structure) suggests a focus on sustained supply. 5. The contract's classification under Stationery Product Manufacturing points to a critical but often overlooked area of federal procurement. 6. The award to DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC. warrants further investigation into their capacity and past performance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the types and quantities of stationery products procured. However, a $4.61 billion total potential value over its lifecycle suggests a significant investment. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) contract type aims to balance cost certainty with the need to account for market fluctuations. Without comparable contract data for similar large-scale stationery procurements, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult, but the scale implies a strategic sourcing effort by GSA.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and terms. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was intended and likely achieved, which is a positive sign for price discovery and market responsiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider selection of quality goods and services as vendors strive to win the contract.

Public Impact

Federal agencies across various departments will benefit from a reliable and potentially cost-effective source for essential stationery supplies. The contract ensures the continuous availability of critical office supplies, supporting the day-to-day operations of government functions. The geographic impact is national, as GSA serves federal agencies nationwide, though specific delivery locations will vary. The contract supports jobs within the stationery manufacturing and distribution sectors, both at the prime contractor and potentially at its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the types and quantities of stationery products makes it difficult to assess if the $4.61B ceiling is justified.
The economic price adjustment clause requires careful monitoring to ensure it does not lead to excessive cost increases due to inflation.
The contractor's track record and capacity to fulfill such a large-scale, long-term requirement need thorough vetting.
Potential for vendor lock-in if this BPA call becomes the primary or sole source for many agencies over time.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
The fixed-price component provides a baseline cost certainty for budgeting purposes.
GSA's involvement indicates a centralized and potentially efficient procurement process for common goods.
The long-term nature of the contract (implied by BPA call) can lead to economies of scale and stable supply chains.

Sector Analysis

The stationery and office supply market is a mature industry with established players. Federal procurement represents a significant segment of this market. Contracts like this, often structured as Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) or calls against BPAs, aim to streamline the acquisition of commonly used items for federal agencies. The total federal spending on office supplies is substantial, and GSA plays a key role in consolidating demand to achieve better pricing and ensure compliance with procurement regulations. This contract fits within the broader category of general office supplies and administrative support services.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this particular BPA call. While the prime contractor is not identified as a small business, the contract's structure under GSA's Federal Acquisition Service may still offer subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the supply chain. Agencies utilizing this BPA call are encouraged to seek out small business suppliers for their specific needs where feasible, and the prime contractor may have obligations to report on small business subcontracting efforts if applicable to the overall BPA.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. GSA is responsible for ensuring contract compliance, monitoring performance, and managing the BPA. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and the potential for corrective actions if the contractor fails to meet obligations. Inspector General oversight may be involved if significant issues or allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Office Supplies Procurement
Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) Contracts
Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs)
Government-wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs)

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to economic price adjustment.
Contractor capacity and performance risk for a large-value contract.
Lack of specific product details hinders value assessment.
Over-reliance on a single BPA call could limit agency flexibility.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4,610.49 to DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC.. PORTFOLIO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4,610.49.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-04. End: 2026-04-10.

What is the specific breakdown of stationery products covered under this $4.61B contract, and how was the total ceiling value determined?

The provided data does not specify the exact breakdown of stationery products included in this contract, nor does it detail the methodology used to arrive at the $4.61 billion ceiling value. Typically, such large contract ceilings represent the maximum potential value over the contract's period of performance, including all options. The determination would likely involve historical spending data, projected agency needs, and market analysis for various stationery items. Without this granular detail, it's difficult to ascertain if the ceiling is appropriately justified or if it represents potential over-allocation. Further analysis would require access to the contract's statement of work and detailed pricing schedules.

How does the pricing structure (Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment) compare to similar large-scale federal stationery contracts, and what are the potential risks associated with the economic p

The Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA) structure is common for long-term contracts involving commodities susceptible to market fluctuations, like paper or raw materials used in stationery. It aims to provide cost certainty by fixing a base price while allowing for adjustments based on pre-defined economic indices (e.g., inflation rates, raw material costs). Compared to pure Fixed Price (FP) contracts, FPEPA offers more flexibility to the contractor, potentially leading to slightly higher initial base prices to account for anticipated adjustments. The primary risk for the government is that the economic price adjustment could lead to costs exceeding initial projections if inflation or market prices rise significantly, eroding potential savings. Conversely, it protects the contractor from unforeseen cost increases, ensuring supply continuity.

What is DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC.'s track record with large federal contracts, particularly those managed by GSA, and what is their capacity to fulfill this significant award?

Information regarding DOCUMENT IMAGING DIMENSIONS INC.'s specific track record with large federal contracts, especially those managed by GSA, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their contract history, past performance evaluations, and any reported issues or successes on similar procurements. Their capacity to fulfill a contract with a potential ceiling of $4.61 billion hinges on their financial stability, manufacturing capabilities, distribution network, and management expertise. Verifying their ability to scale operations, maintain quality control, and meet delivery timelines across potentially numerous federal agencies nationwide is crucial for ensuring the success of this award.

Given this is a BPA Call, what are the implications for agencies that rely on this contract versus those that might seek alternative sources for stationery?

As a BPA Call, this contract likely serves as a primary, streamlined procurement vehicle for federal agencies needing stationery products. Agencies utilizing this BPA can benefit from pre-negotiated terms, potentially faster ordering processes, and the assurance of competition having been conducted. However, it could also lead to a degree of vendor lock-in if agencies become accustomed to using this specific source. Agencies with highly specialized or unique stationery requirements might still need to pursue separate, non-BPA procurements. The existence of such a large contract may also influence the market dynamics for smaller, specialized suppliers who may not be able to compete at this scale or may find it harder to secure agency attention.

How does the $4.61B total value compare to historical federal spending on stationery products, and does this indicate an increase or consolidation in this procurement category?

The provided data does not include historical federal spending figures for stationery products, making a direct comparison difficult. However, a $4.61 billion potential value suggests a significant consolidation or a substantial increase in the scope of federal stationery procurement under this specific contract vehicle. GSA often aims to consolidate spending through large contracts like BPAs to achieve economies of scale and improve efficiency. If historical spending was fragmented across many smaller contracts, this award could represent a strategic effort to centralize procurement. Conversely, if previous spending was already concentrated, this figure might indicate an expansion of the product scope or an anticipated rise in demand.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Converted Paper Product Manufacturing › Stationery Product Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 205 BEAVER ST, YORKVILLE, IL, 60560

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,610

Exercised Options: $4,610

Current Obligation: $4,610

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC26A0004

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline