GSA's $3.8M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC for CFPB Operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,788,146 ($3.8M)

Contractor: Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-12-31

End Date: 2026-10-25

Contract Duration: 298 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TRANSFER OF CONSUMER FINANCE PROTECTION BUREAU OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS FROM 9531CB23F0001 TO GSA FOR THE LOCATION AT 1700 G ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20552

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.8 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC for work described as: TRANSFER OF CONSUMER FINANCE PROTECTION BUREAU OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS FROM 9531CB23F0001 TO GSA FOR THE LOCATION AT 1700 G ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC. Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.8M over approximately 2 years for facilities support services. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is a delivery order under a larger GSA schedule, indicating potential for future task orders. 4. Services include facilities support, aligning with the Public Buildings Service's mission. 5. The contract's duration and value appear moderate for facilities management services. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this specific award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.8 million for approximately two years of facilities support services appears reasonable when benchmarked against similar contracts for building operations and maintenance. While specific per-unit cost data is not provided, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost for the services rendered. The award to Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC, a company with a track record in government contracting, further supports a fair assessment of value, assuming performance meets expectations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 2 bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, but two bids still provide a basis for price discovery and selection.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with two bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives competitive pricing and services from qualified vendors, preventing potential overpayment.

Public Impact

Federal employees at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will benefit from continued operational facilities. Essential services such as facilities support and maintenance will be delivered. The geographic impact is localized to Washington, D.C., specifically at 1700 G St NW. The contract supports the operational needs of a key federal agency, ensuring continuity of government functions.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, given the nature of facilities support.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical building operations.
Risk of price increases in future contract modifications or renewals if market conditions change.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a GSA schedule, which typically involves pre-vetted contractors and established pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost overruns.
Clear performance period and defined scope of services.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a significant sector within government contracting. This sector encompasses a wide range of services including building operations, maintenance, and management. The total federal spending in this sector is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually to support government facilities nationwide. This particular contract fits within the broader trend of agencies outsourcing facility management to specialized service providers, often leveraging GSA schedules for efficiency and competitive sourcing.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. Therefore, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, focusing instead on larger or established service providers capable of meeting the requirements of a full and open competition. Future opportunities for small businesses might arise through subcontracting if the prime contractor chooses to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a delivery order under a GSA schedule, it benefits from GSA's established procurement processes and oversight mechanisms. Accountability is ensured through the firm-fixed-price contract terms and the defined period of performance. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics are typically internal.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration Facilities Management Contracts
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Operations Support
Federal Building Maintenance Services
GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract performance risk
Potential for scope creep
Dependency on contractor for critical services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.8 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC. TRANSFER OF CONSUMER FINANCE PROTECTION BUREAU OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS FROM 9531CB23F0001 TO GSA FOR THE LOCATION AT 1700 G ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-31. End: 2026-10-25.

What is the track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to facilities support and maintenance. While the provided data indicates this specific contract is for $3.8 million over approximately two years, a deeper dive into their contract history would reveal the scale, duration, and success rates of their previous engagements. Examining past performance evaluations and any reported issues or commendations would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in delivering services to government agencies. Understanding their experience with similar-sized or more complex facilities management projects would be crucial for assessing their suitability for this role.

How does the awarded price of $3.8 million compare to market rates for similar facilities support services in Washington, D.C.?

Benchmarking the $3.8 million contract value against market rates for similar facilities support services in Washington, D.C. requires detailed analysis of the specific services included (e.g., HVAC, janitorial, security, groundskeeping). General market data suggests that facilities management for large government buildings in high-cost areas like D.C. can range significantly, often in the millions annually depending on square footage and service scope. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract implies that the government has negotiated a set price. Without a detailed breakdown of the services and service levels, a precise comparison is difficult, but the contract's duration of just under two years suggests an annualized cost of approximately $1.9 million, which appears within a plausible range for comprehensive building support in a major metropolitan area.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential underperformance by the contractor, leading to disruptions in CFPB operations, and the possibility of cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond the initial agreement, although the firm-fixed-price structure mitigates this. Contractor underperformance can be mitigated through robust contract oversight by GSA, clear performance standards, and defined remedies for non-compliance. The risk of scope creep is managed by adhering strictly to the contract's defined deliverables and utilizing formal change order processes for any necessary modifications. Additionally, reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities functions introduces a dependency risk that GSA and CFPB must monitor.

How effective is the current contract structure (delivery order under GSA schedule) in ensuring program effectiveness for facilities support?

Utilizing a delivery order under a GSA schedule is generally an effective method for procuring facilities support services. This approach leverages GSA's pre-negotiated contract terms and conditions, including pricing, which streamlines the acquisition process and often ensures a baseline level of quality and compliance. The effectiveness for this specific contract hinges on the clarity of the Statement of Work (SOW) within the delivery order and the diligence of GSA's contract administration in monitoring performance against that SOW. The firm-fixed-price model incentivizes the contractor to deliver efficiently, contributing to program effectiveness if managed well.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the CFPB or similar agencies?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support at the CFPB or similar agencies typically show consistent annual expenditures for building operations, maintenance, and related services. Agencies often rely on GSA for these services, either through direct contracts or by utilizing GSA's master schedules. Spending can fluctuate based on building upgrades, energy efficiency initiatives, or changes in occupancy. For a facility of this nature in Washington D.C., annual spending in the range of $1.5 million to $2.5 million for comprehensive support services would not be unusual, making the current $3.8 million over nearly two years align with typical budgetary allocations for such requirements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAA-26-0102

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 998 ELM HILL PIKE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,559,061

Exercised Options: $3,788,146

Current Obligation: $3,788,146

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS06Q16BQDU105

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline