GSA awards $5.6M facilities support contract to Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC for Utah services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,657,355 ($5.7M)

Contractor: Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-02-01

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: UTAH TOTAL FACILITIES SOLUTION OPTION YEAR III STANDARD SERVICES IN OGDEN-SALT LAKE CITY-PROVO, UTAH. SERVICES INCLUDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, CUSTODIAL, SNOW REMOVAL, GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER RELATED SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE County, UTAH, 84138

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5.7 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC for work described as: UTAH TOTAL FACILITIES SOLUTION OPTION YEAR III STANDARD SERVICES IN OGDEN-SALT LAKE CITY-PROVO, UTAH. SERVICES INCLUDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, CUSTODIAL, SNOW REMOVAL, GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER RELATED SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract provides comprehensive facilities engineering, operations, maintenance, custodial, snow removal, and groundskeeping services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The firm fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 4. Services are concentrated in Utah, impacting federal facilities within Ogden, Salt Lake City, and Provo. 5. The duration of the contract is one year, with potential for extensions. 6. The award is a BPA Call, indicating it's a task order under a broader agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $5.6 million for a one-year period for comprehensive facilities management services in a specific geographic region appears to be within a reasonable range. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure helps in cost predictability, but the overall value depends on the efficiency and quality of services delivered by Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The agency likely sought proposals that offered the best value, considering both price and technical qualifications.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive market rates, preventing potential overpricing that could occur with less competitive methods.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating facilities in Ogden, Salt Lake City, and Provo, Utah, will benefit from consistent and reliable facility operations. Services include essential functions like engineering, maintenance, custodial care, and groundskeeping, ensuring safe and functional federal buildings. The geographic impact is localized to the specified areas within Utah. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector in Utah.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the contractor's past performance or potential for future success.
The absence of the number of bidders limits the ability to fully gauge the intensity of competition and its potential impact on pricing.
The contract is a BPA Call, which relies on the terms of a pre-existing Basic Ordering Agreement; the overall value and terms of that BPA are not detailed here.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially robust bidding process.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contractor, Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC, has secured a significant contract, suggesting they meet the agency's requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This sector is crucial for government operations, ensuring that federal facilities are safe, functional, and well-maintained. Spending in this sector is often substantial across various agencies, with significant market size driven by the vast inventory of federal real estate. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by agencies like GSA, DOD, or VA.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC, will be responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements. Any subcontracting opportunities would be at the discretion of the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As this is a firm fixed-price contract, the focus will be on ensuring the contractor meets the defined service levels and deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
GSA Operations and Maintenance Contracts
Facilities Engineering Services
Custodial Services Contracts
Grounds Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality degradation if contractor faces cost overruns.
Limited insight into the number of competing bidders.
Dependence on the terms and conditions of the underlying Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5.7 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC. UTAH TOTAL FACILITIES SOLUTION OPTION YEAR III STANDARD SERVICES IN OGDEN-SALT LAKE CITY-PROVO, UTAH. SERVICES INCLUDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE, CUSTODIAL, SNOW REMOVAL, GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER RELATED SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-02-01. End: 2027-01-31.

What is the track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC with GSA or other federal agencies for similar facilities support services?

Information regarding the specific track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC for facilities support services with GSA or other federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or commendations. Federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS can often provide insights into a contractor's past performance on similar contracts. Without this specific data, it's challenging to definitively assess their experience and reliability for this particular scope of work.

How does the awarded price of $5.6 million compare to market rates for similar facilities management services in Utah?

The awarded price of $5.6 million for a one-year comprehensive facilities management contract in Utah needs to be benchmarked against market rates. This would involve comparing the cost per square foot or per service unit against industry standards and rates paid for similar services in the Ogden-Salt Lake City-Provo region. Factors such as the scope of services (engineering, custodial, groundskeeping, etc.), the size and complexity of the facilities managed, and the specific service level agreements will influence the comparison. A detailed market analysis or consultation with industry experts would be necessary for a precise comparison.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC in fulfilling this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC. Typically, for facilities support services, KPIs might include response times for maintenance requests, quality of janitorial services (e.g., cleanliness scores), efficiency of snow removal operations, adherence to safety protocols, and overall customer satisfaction from facility occupants. The contract documents and performance work statement (PWS) would outline these specific metrics and their associated targets.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the General Services Administration in Utah?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the General Services Administration (GSA) in Utah are not detailed in the provided data. To understand this, one would need to analyze GSA's procurement history for similar services within Utah over previous fiscal years. This analysis would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors frequently awarded these types of agreements. Such historical data is crucial for contextualizing the current $5.6 million award and assessing whether it aligns with past spending levels or represents a significant deviation.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for comprehensive facilities management?

A primary risk with a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract for comprehensive facilities management is that the contractor may cut corners on service quality or labor to maintain profitability if costs exceed initial estimates. Conversely, if the contractor significantly underestimates costs, they may struggle to deliver the contracted services adequately. For the government, the risk lies in potentially receiving subpar services if the contractor is unable to manage their costs effectively. However, FFP contracts offer cost certainty to the government, shifting most of the cost risk to the contractor.

How does the BPA Call mechanism affect the oversight and flexibility of this contract?

A BPA Call (Basic Ordering Agreement Call) is a task order issued under a pre-existing Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA). This means the foundational terms and conditions, including pricing structures and general scope, were established in the BOA, likely through a prior competitive process. The BPA Call itself then specifies the particular services, quantities, and delivery schedules for this specific requirement. Oversight is typically managed through the performance monitoring of the task order, ensuring compliance with the BOA's terms. Flexibility can be enhanced as BOAs are designed to streamline future ordering for recurring needs, but the specific flexibility is governed by the terms negotiated within the BOA itself.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMBA260052

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 998 ELM HILL PIKE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,657,355

Exercised Options: $5,657,355

Current Obligation: $5,657,355

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PJ0023A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline