GSA awards $11.16M contract for facilities support services to Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,158,600 ($11.2M)

Contractor: Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: O&M SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20037

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $11.2 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC for work described as: O&M SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call under full and open competition. 2. Focus on facilities support services, specifically electronic metrology. 3. Contract duration of 1095 days (3 years). 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs. 5. Awarded by General Services Administration (GSA) to Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC. 6. Service area covers Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.16 million over three years for facilities support services, specifically electronic metrology, appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized technical support. Benchmarking against similar contracts for metrology services is challenging without more granular data on the specific services provided. The firm fixed price structure offers cost predictability for the government. However, a detailed assessment of value for money would require comparing the proposed services and pricing against industry standards and potentially other qualified bidders.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, likely through an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. This indicates that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition generally promotes a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The use of a BPA Call suggests that a broader competition may have already occurred to establish the underlying agreement.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of providers to compete, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality through market forces.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the General Services Administration (GSA), which will receive essential facilities support services. The contract ensures the continued operation and maintenance of electronic metrology laboratory functions. Services are geographically focused within Washington D.C. The contract supports specialized technical roles within the facilities management sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor performance.
Limited insight into the specific scope of 'electronic metrology' services and their criticality.
No data on past performance or contractor track record provided.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Contract is for essential facilities support services, indicating a clear government need.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services, including electronic metrology, fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This sector is characterized by a wide range of specialized expertise. The market size for facilities management and metrology services is substantial, driven by government and commercial needs for maintaining infrastructure and ensuring the accuracy of measurement equipment. This contract represents a specific, albeit specialized, component of GSA's overall facilities management strategy.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC, is not specified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. The firm fixed price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by limiting cost overruns. Transparency is facilitated by the contract being awarded under full and open competition, with details likely available through federal procurement databases. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues arising.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Support Services
Electronic Metrology
General Services Administration Contracts
BPA Call Awards
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Limited information on contractor's past performance.
Scope of 'electronic metrology' requires further definition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $11.2 million to ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC. O&M SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ELECTRONIC METROLOGY LABORATORY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the specific nature of the 'electronic metrology' services required under this contract, and how do they differ from general facilities maintenance?

Electronic metrology refers to the science and practice of measurement in the field of electronics. This typically involves calibrating, maintaining, and repairing electronic test equipment, sensors, and measurement systems to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Unlike general facilities maintenance, which might cover HVAC, plumbing, or structural upkeep, electronic metrology is a highly specialized technical service focused on the precision and functionality of electronic instrumentation. This could include ensuring the accuracy of signal generators, oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers, and other critical devices used in testing and research environments. The specific requirements would detail the types of equipment, calibration standards, and reporting procedures.

How does the $11.16 million contract value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

Comparing the $11.16 million contract value requires context regarding the specific services and duration. For a three-year contract focused on specialized electronic metrology within facilities support, this value appears moderate. GSA manages a vast portfolio of facilities contracts, ranging from basic janitorial services to highly technical engineering and maintenance. Contracts for specialized technical services like metrology are typically more expensive per unit of service than general maintenance due to the required expertise and equipment. Without access to a detailed breakdown of the scope of work and the number of personnel or hours allocated, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, it does not appear to be an exceptionally large or small award for specialized technical support over a three-year period.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract to ensure effective service delivery?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, for facilities support and metrology services, KPIs might include metrics such as calibration turnaround time, accuracy rates of measurements, equipment uptime, response times for service calls, and adherence to safety protocols. SLAs would define the expected standards for these metrics and potential remedies or penalties for non-compliance. The contracting officer's representative (COR) at GSA would be responsible for monitoring performance against these agreed-upon terms throughout the contract's duration.

What is the track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC in performing similar government contracts, particularly those involving metrology services?

Information regarding the specific track record of Electronic Metrology Laboratory, LLC in performing similar government contracts, especially those involving metrology services, is not included in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing the company's past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous contract awards, and any reported issues or successes. Federal procurement databases and agency records would typically hold this information. Without this data, it's challenging to evaluate their experience and reliability for this specific requirement.

Given the firm fixed price (FFP) contract type, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential scope creep or unforeseen cost increases?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is designed to provide cost certainty by fixing the price regardless of the contractor's actual costs. To manage potential scope creep or unforeseen cost increases under an FFP contract, the government relies heavily on a clearly defined Statement of Work (SOW) and robust contract administration. Any changes to the scope of work would typically require a formal contract modification, which would involve negotiation of any associated cost or schedule adjustments. The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) plays a crucial role in monitoring adherence to the SOW and preventing unauthorized work. If the contractor encounters unforeseen costs that do not stem from a scope change, they generally bear that risk under an FFP agreement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 998 ELM HILL PIKE, NASHVILLE, TN, 37210

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $36,821,846

Exercised Options: $11,158,600

Current Obligation: $11,158,600

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0322A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline