GSA awards $6.7M facilities management contract for Battle Creek Federal Center to CMC & MAINTENANCE INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,713,995 ($6.7M)

Contractor: CMC & Maintenance Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-04-01

End Date: 2027-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT THE HART-DOLE-INOUYE FEDERAL CENTER, BATTLE CREEK, MI

Place of Performance

Location: BATTLE CREEK, CALHOUN County, MICHIGAN, 49037

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $6.7 million to CMC & MAINTENANCE INC for work described as: CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT THE HART-DOLE-INOUYE FEDERAL CENTER, BATTLE CREEK, MI Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. Contract duration of nearly three years provides long-term service stability. 5. Services include facilities support, essential for federal building operations. 6. No small business set-aside, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller firms.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.7 million over approximately three years for facilities management services at a federal center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal buildings suggests this price point is within expected ranges, especially considering the scope of services required. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator for value. Without specific details on the exact services and performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the initial indicators are positive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The use of a BPA Call suggests that the underlying contract vehicle was already competed. The specific competition for this call order is not detailed, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust process. A competitive environment generally leads to better pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive nature of this award, as it is expected to drive down costs and improve the quality of facilities management services through market forces.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors to the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center in Battle Creek, MI, will benefit from maintained and operational facilities. Essential services such as maintenance, repair, and operational support for the federal building are delivered. The geographic impact is localized to Battle Creek, Michigan, ensuring the functionality of a key federal facility. The contract supports the operational workforce required for facilities management, potentially including local labor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities management is a significant sector within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This contract falls under the Facilities Support Services NAICS code (561210). The federal government is a major consumer of these services, with spending spread across numerous agencies and facilities nationwide. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot for similar federal buildings or the total contract value for comprehensive facilities management across multiple sites. This contract represents a mid-tier award for a single federal building.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the data indicates no specific small business subcontracting goals were mandated. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this contract are limited to potential subcontracting roles that may or may not be actively pursued by the prime contractor. The absence of a set-aside or specific subcontracting plan could mean a reduced impact on the local small business ecosystem for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which is responsible for federal building management. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-management, facilities-support-services, general-services-administration, public-buildings-service, battle-creek, michigan, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, mid-size-contract, federal-building

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $6.7 million to CMC & MAINTENANCE INC. CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT THE HART-DOLE-INOUYE FEDERAL CENTER, BATTLE CREEK, MI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CMC & MAINTENANCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-04-01. End: 2027-03-31.

What is the track record of CMC & MAINTENANCE INC. in performing similar federal facilities management contracts?

Assessing the track record of CMC & MAINTENANCE INC. is crucial for understanding their capability to deliver on this $6.7 million facilities management contract. A review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving similar scope, scale, and complexity, would reveal their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms. Data from contract databases and performance evaluations (if publicly available) can indicate whether they have a history of successful contract completion, timely delivery, and effective issue resolution. Any past performance issues, such as contract disputes, terminations, or negative CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) ratings, would be significant red flags. Conversely, a strong history of positive performance and client satisfaction would bolster confidence in their ability to meet the requirements of the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center contract.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities management services in Battle Creek, MI?

To benchmark the value of this $6.7 million contract, a comparison of its pricing against prevailing market rates for similar facilities management services in the Battle Creek, Michigan area is necessary. This involves analyzing the cost per square foot, labor rates, and overhead associated with comparable commercial or government contracts in the region. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., HVAC, janitorial, groundskeeping, security, repairs), the size and type of facility, and the contract duration influence these rates. If the awarded price is significantly lower than market averages, it could indicate exceptional value or potentially underestimated scope. Conversely, a price substantially higher than market rates might suggest a lack of competitive pressure or an inflated cost structure. Detailed market research or consultation with industry experts would provide a more precise comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this $6.7 million facilities management contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor (CMC & MAINTENANCE INC.), leading to disruptions in essential building operations. Another risk is the possibility of cost overruns if the firm fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen maintenance needs or price escalations, although the fixed-price nature aims to mitigate this. Contractor dependency is also a risk; if the contractor fails to perform, finding and transitioning to a new provider can be disruptive. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the GSA, clearly defined performance standards and metrics, regular performance reviews, and contingency planning. The competitive award process itself serves as an initial risk mitigation step by selecting a contractor deemed capable of meeting requirements.

How effective is the current facilities management service likely to be in supporting the operational needs of the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center?

The effectiveness of the facilities management service hinges on the contractor's ability to consistently deliver high-quality support as outlined in the contract. Given the award was made through full and open competition, it suggests that multiple bidders vied for the contract, implying a market-driven selection process aimed at identifying a capable provider. The General Services Administration (GSA) will oversee the contract, likely enforcing performance standards and ensuring that the services provided meet the operational needs of the federal center. Factors contributing to effectiveness include the contractor's staffing levels, expertise, responsiveness to issues, and proactive maintenance strategies. The three-year duration provides stability, allowing the contractor to become familiar with the facility's specific requirements and implement efficient operational procedures.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities management at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center or similar GSA-managed facilities?

Historical spending patterns for facilities management at the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center, or similar GSA-managed facilities, provide context for the current $6.7 million award. Analyzing past expenditures would reveal trends in costs, the types of services procured, and the contractors utilized over time. This data can highlight whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it aligns with inflation or changes in facility usage. Understanding historical spending helps in evaluating the reasonableness of the current contract's value and identifying potential areas for cost savings or efficiency improvements in future procurements. For instance, if previous contracts for this facility were significantly lower or higher, it warrants an investigation into the reasons, such as changes in service scope, market conditions, or contract types.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PF0023Q0214

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4 UNION ST, BANGOR, ME, 04401

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,045,039

Exercised Options: $6,713,995

Current Obligation: $6,713,995

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0024A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-04-01

Current End Date: 2027-03-31

Potential End Date: 2034-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-25

More Contracts from CMC & Maintenance Inc

View all CMC & Maintenance Inc federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending