DOJ contract for intelligence instructors awarded to Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC for $5.03M

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,031,586 ($5.0M)

Contractor: Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-11-01

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: HUMAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS SECTION AND INTELLIGENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SECTION INSTRUCTORS

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $5.0 million to CHENEGA ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: HUMAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS SECTION AND INTELLIGENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SECTION INSTRUCTORS Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical intelligence operations and workforce development, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The awardee, Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, has a significant presence in government contracting. 3. The contract duration of 364 days suggests a need for ongoing support rather than a one-time project. 4. The 'Engineering Services' NAICS code (541330) might indicate a broader scope than just instruction, potentially including curriculum development or technical support. 5. The contract is a Delivery Order under a larger IDIQ or similar vehicle, implying it's part of a broader procurement strategy. 6. The contract is for Time and Materials, which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $5.03 million for a 364-day period. Without specific benchmarks for intelligence instructor services or comparable contracts for similar workforce development programs, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing structure warrants close monitoring to ensure costs remain within reasonable bounds and align with the services delivered. Further analysis would require comparing the hourly rates and total cost against industry standards for specialized instructional and technical support services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the pool of bidders. The presence of 4 bidders suggests some level of competition, but the exclusion of sources raises questions about the extent of market engagement and whether the most competitive pricing was achieved.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition, due to the exclusion of sources, may have resulted in a higher price for taxpayers than if a fully open and unrestricted competition had been conducted.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the personnel within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) requiring specialized intelligence operations training. The services delivered include instruction for intelligence operations and workforce development, enhancing the capabilities of the intelligence community. The contract is geographically located in Alaska (ST: AK, SN: ALASKA), suggesting a specific regional need for these services. This contract directly impacts the intelligence workforce by providing essential training and development, potentially improving national security operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost uncertainty and potential overruns if not managed diligently.
The 'limited' competition, stemming from the exclusion of sources, might have constrained price discovery and potentially increased costs for the government.
The NAICS code 'Engineering Services' may indicate a broader scope than initially apparent, requiring careful oversight to ensure services align with instructional needs.

Positive Signals

The contract is awarded to a single entity, Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, suggesting a focused relationship for specialized services.
The contract duration of nearly a full year indicates a sustained need for these critical intelligence training services.
The award is a Delivery Order, implying it is part of a larger, potentially pre-vetted, contracting vehicle, which can streamline procurement.

Sector Analysis

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) operates within the broader national security and intelligence sector. This contract for intelligence operations and workforce development instructors falls under professional services, specifically within the realm of specialized training and technical support. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in intelligence, security, and government training. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing its total cost and duration against similar training and development contracts awarded by other intelligence agencies or federal law enforcement bodies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business set-aside (ss) and subcontracting (sb) flags are false. This suggests that the contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have explicit subcontracting requirements detailed in this specific award. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this particular contract is likely minimal, unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a component of the Department of Justice. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

FBI Training and Development Programs
Intelligence Community Workforce Enhancement
Federal Law Enforcement Training
Department of Justice Professional Services Contracts
National Security Training Initiatives

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Limited competition may impact price discovery.
Geographic location in Alaska could introduce logistical complexities and higher costs.
NAICS code 'Engineering Services' may indicate a broader scope requiring careful oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $5.0 million to CHENEGA ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS, LLC. HUMAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS SECTION AND INTELLIGENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SECTION INSTRUCTORS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHENEGA ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS & SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-11-01. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the track record of Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and similar intelligence training contracts?

Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC has a history of securing contracts with various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and intelligence community components. Their portfolio often includes support services, IT, and training. To assess their specific track record with the FBI and for intelligence training, a deeper dive into past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes would be necessary. Analyzing their performance on similar contracts would reveal their capability to deliver specialized instruction and manage workforce development programs effectively. This includes examining on-time delivery, quality of services, and adherence to budget on previous engagements.

How does the $5.03 million award compare to similar intelligence instructor contracts in terms of value and scope?

Comparing the $5.03 million award requires identifying comparable contracts for intelligence instructor services and workforce development within the federal government. Factors such as the number of personnel trained, the duration of the training, the complexity of the subject matter, and the specific skills required (e.g., technical intelligence, human intelligence, counterintelligence) are crucial for a meaningful benchmark. Without access to a detailed database of similar contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this award represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, the Time and Materials (T&M) nature of the contract suggests that cost control and diligent oversight are paramount to ensure the final expenditure aligns with the delivered value and doesn't exceed market rates for comparable expertise.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for specialized instruction, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for specialized instruction is the potential for cost overruns if the scope of work is not clearly defined or if the contractor's labor hours are not efficiently managed. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts allow the contractor to bill for actual labor hours and material costs incurred. For this FBI contract, risks include the possibility of extended training periods, unexpected material needs, or inefficient use of instructor time, all of which could drive up the total cost beyond initial projections. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust government oversight, including detailed review of timesheets and invoices, establishing not-to-exceed (NTE) limits for labor hours or total cost, and clearly defining performance metrics and deliverables to ensure the contractor remains focused on efficient service delivery.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' designation imply for the procurement process and potential outcomes?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates that the solicitation was initially intended for full and open competition, but specific sources were subsequently excluded from consideration. This exclusion could be due to various reasons, such as prior performance issues, security concerns, or specific technical requirements that only a limited number of vendors could meet. While it implies a broader competition than a sole-source award, it is less competitive than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The presence of 4 bidders suggests some level of market interest, but the exclusion of other potential sources might have limited the competitive pressure on pricing and innovation, potentially impacting the overall value achieved for the taxpayer.

What is the significance of the NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) for a contract described as intelligence instructor services?

The assignment of NAICS code 541330, 'Engineering Services,' to a contract for 'HUMAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS SECTION AND INTELLIGENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT SECTION INSTRUCTORS' is noteworthy. While engineering services typically relate to the design, development, and application of engineering principles, its use here might suggest that the instructional services involve highly technical aspects, complex systems, or require a deep understanding of engineering principles applied within intelligence operations. It could also indicate that the contract encompasses more than just direct instruction, potentially including curriculum development, technical system training, or the design of training environments that require engineering expertise. This broader scope necessitates careful contract management to ensure all services align with the FBI's intelligence training objectives.

How does the geographic location in Alaska impact the contract's execution and cost?

The contract's specified location in Alaska (ST: AK, SN: ALASKA) can introduce unique logistical and cost considerations. Operating in remote or less accessible areas often entails higher travel expenses, potential difficulties in recruiting and retaining specialized instructors, and increased costs for materials and support services. The FBI may have awarded this contract to Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC specifically because they possess the capability to effectively deliver these critical intelligence training services in this particular geographic region, potentially overcoming the inherent challenges. The cost structure of the contract would need to account for these regional factors to ensure fair compensation for the contractor and reasonable expenditure for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 609 INDEPENDENCE PKWY STE 210, CHESAPEAKE, VA, 23320

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,242,205

Exercised Options: $9,129,809

Current Obligation: $5,031,586

Actual Outlays: $101,090

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAD20D1140

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline