DOJ's $4.7M CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract awarded to Monongahela Power Company for IT services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,745,911 ($4.7M)

Contractor: Monongahela Power Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-01-01

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: CJIS ELECTRIC 2026

Place of Performance

Location: CLARKSBURG, HARRISON County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26301

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $4.7 million to MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY for work described as: CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 Key points: 1. The contract value of $4.7 million for a one-year period suggests a moderate investment in IT infrastructure. 2. Awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', this indicates potential sole-source justification or limited market availability. 3. The 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code points to a broad range of potential IT support functions. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 5. The contract duration of 364 days aligns with typical annual IT service agreements. 6. The single award suggests a focused relationship with the chosen vendor for this specific requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific service details. The $4.7 million for a year of 'Other Computer Related Services' is not inherently high or low without context. However, the lack of competition raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible price. Comparing it to similar, competitively bid IT service contracts of comparable scope would be necessary for a more definitive value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature provides budget predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', which typically signifies a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The specific justification for this procurement approach is not detailed in the provided data. Without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to assess the extent of market interest or the number of potential bidders. This approach may be used when only one vendor can provide the required service or when urgency dictates a rapid award.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the absence of competition limits price negotiation leverage.

Public Impact

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary beneficiary of these IT services. The services are expected to support the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) system, crucial for law enforcement. The contract's geographic impact is centered in West Virginia, where Monongahela Power Company is based. The contract likely supports IT personnel and infrastructure, indirectly impacting the federal workforce's technological capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is vast and highly competitive. This contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services,' a broad category that can encompass everything from IT consulting and system integration to data processing and disaster recovery. The federal government is a significant consumer of IT services, with spending often driven by modernization efforts, cybersecurity needs, and the maintenance of complex information systems like the CJIS. The $4.7 million value for a one-year definitive contract is moderate within the federal IT spending landscape, suggesting a specific, perhaps specialized, IT support function rather than a large-scale system development or overhaul.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation is not a stated factor in this contract ('ss': false, 'sb': false). There is no indication of a small business set-aside or specific subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus of this procurement was on the specific capabilities required, rather than on promoting small business engagement. Consequently, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is likely minimal, unless Monongahela Power Company voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, performance metrics, and payment schedules. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, department-of-justice, federal-bureau-of-investigation, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, other-computer-related-services, west-virginia, moderate-value, annual-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $4.7 million to MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY. CJIS ELECTRIC 2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-01-01. End: 2026-12-31.

What specific services are included under the 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code for this contract?

The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is a broad category encompassing a wide array of IT support functions not classified under more specific codes. For the CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract, this could potentially include services such as IT consulting, custom software development, system integration, IT project management, data processing, disaster recovery services, or specialized IT support for the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) systems. Without further details from the contract's statement of work (SOW), it is difficult to pinpoint the exact nature of the services. However, given the context of the FBI and CJIS, it likely involves maintaining, enhancing, or supporting critical IT infrastructure and applications that facilitate information sharing among law enforcement agencies.

What is the justification for awarding this contract as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'?

The designation 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' strongly suggests a sole-source award, meaning only one responsible source was determined to be capable of providing the required services. Common justifications for sole-source procurements include: the existence of only one vendor capable of meeting the requirement (e.g., proprietary technology or unique expertise), urgent and compelling needs where competition is not feasible, or specific national security concerns. For this contract, the specific reason for the sole-source award is not provided in the summary data. A deeper dive into the contract's justification documentation, often found in agency procurement files, would be necessary to understand the rationale behind bypassing a competitive bidding process. This could involve unique infrastructure dependencies, specialized knowledge of the CJIS systems, or a critical, time-sensitive need that precluded a full and open competition.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type impact risk and cost for the government?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of cost overruns are manageable. Under an FFP contract, the contractor agrees to a set price for the specified goods or services, regardless of their actual costs incurred. This shifts the primary financial risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For the government, this provides significant cost certainty and predictability, making budgeting easier. However, if the contractor underestimates costs or encounters unforeseen difficulties, they bear the loss. Conversely, if the contractor performs efficiently and manages costs well, they retain any savings, which can incentivize performance. For the CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract, the FFP structure means the Department of Justice knows the total cost upfront, assuming the contractor meets all performance obligations.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar IT services at the FBI or DOJ?

Historical spending on IT services by the FBI and the broader Department of Justice (DOJ) is substantial, reflecting the critical role of technology in modern law enforcement and justice administration. The FBI, in particular, manages vast amounts of data and complex systems like the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS). Annual IT spending across the DOJ often runs into the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars, covering a wide range of services including software development, hardware procurement, network infrastructure, cybersecurity, and IT support. Contracts for 'Other Computer Related Services' are common, but their individual values can vary significantly based on the specific needs. Without access to detailed historical procurement data for the FBI or DOJ, it's difficult to provide precise figures for comparable contracts. However, a $4.7 million contract for a year of specialized IT services is within the typical range for specific project needs or ongoing support functions within such large agencies.

What are the potential performance risks associated with this contract, given the limited competition?

The primary performance risk associated with a sole-source or limited-competition contract like this is the potential for complacency or reduced incentive for the contractor to perform at their best. When a contractor knows they are the only option, or one of very few, the pressure to innovate, maintain high service levels, and control costs can be diminished compared to a highly competitive environment. Specific risks could include slower response times to issues, less proactive problem-solving, potential quality degradation over time, or difficulty in enforcing stringent performance standards if the contract's Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are not robust. Furthermore, if the contractor faces internal challenges (e.g., staffing issues, financial difficulties), the government has fewer immediate alternatives for recourse or replacement, potentially leading to service disruptions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGUTILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5001 NASA BLVD, FAIRMONT, WV, 26554

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,745,911

Exercised Options: $4,745,911

Current Obligation: $4,745,911

Actual Outlays: $422,833

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-01-01

Current End Date: 2026-12-31

Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-16

More Contracts from Monongahela Power Company

View all Monongahela Power Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending