DOJ's $4.7M CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract awarded to Monongahela Power Company for IT services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,745,911 ($4.7M)
Contractor: Monongahela Power Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2026-01-01
End Date: 2026-12-31
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: CJIS ELECTRIC 2026
Place of Performance
Location: CLARKSBURG, HARRISON County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26301
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $4.7 million to MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY for work described as: CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 Key points: 1. The contract value of $4.7 million for a one-year period suggests a moderate investment in IT infrastructure. 2. Awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', this indicates potential sole-source justification or limited market availability. 3. The 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code points to a broad range of potential IT support functions. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government, shifting performance risk to the contractor. 5. The contract duration of 364 days aligns with typical annual IT service agreements. 6. The single award suggests a focused relationship with the chosen vendor for this specific requirement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more specific service details. The $4.7 million for a year of 'Other Computer Related Services' is not inherently high or low without context. However, the lack of competition raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible price. Comparing it to similar, competitively bid IT service contracts of comparable scope would be necessary for a more definitive value assessment. The firm fixed-price nature provides budget predictability.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', which typically signifies a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The specific justification for this procurement approach is not detailed in the provided data. Without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to assess the extent of market interest or the number of potential bidders. This approach may be used when only one vendor can provide the required service or when urgency dictates a rapid award.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the absence of competition limits price negotiation leverage.
Public Impact
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary beneficiary of these IT services. The services are expected to support the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) system, crucial for law enforcement. The contract's geographic impact is centered in West Virginia, where Monongahela Power Company is based. The contract likely supports IT personnel and infrastructure, indirectly impacting the federal workforce's technological capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may result in suboptimal pricing.
- The broad NAICS code 'Other Computer Related Services' lacks specificity, making it hard to gauge the exact services and associated risks.
- The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status requires further investigation into the justification for not seeking multiple bids.
Positive Signals
- The firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract is for a defined period, allowing for future re-evaluation of requirements and vendor performance.
- The award to Monongahela Power Company, a known entity, suggests a degree of confidence in their ability to deliver.
Sector Analysis
The IT services sector is vast and highly competitive. This contract falls under 'Other Computer Related Services,' a broad category that can encompass everything from IT consulting and system integration to data processing and disaster recovery. The federal government is a significant consumer of IT services, with spending often driven by modernization efforts, cybersecurity needs, and the maintenance of complex information systems like the CJIS. The $4.7 million value for a one-year definitive contract is moderate within the federal IT spending landscape, suggesting a specific, perhaps specialized, IT support function rather than a large-scale system development or overhaul.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation is not a stated factor in this contract ('ss': false, 'sb': false). There is no indication of a small business set-aside or specific subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus of this procurement was on the specific capabilities required, rather than on promoting small business engagement. Consequently, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is likely minimal, unless Monongahela Power Company voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. As a definitive contract, it is subject to standard federal procurement regulations and oversight. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, performance metrics, and payment schedules. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- CJIS Systems Agency (CSA) IT Support
- FBI Information Technology Services
- Department of Justice IT Modernization Programs
- Federal Law Enforcement Data Systems Support
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award requires justification review.
- Broad NAICS code may obscure specific service risks.
- Contract performance metrics not detailed.
Tags
it-services, department-of-justice, federal-bureau-of-investigation, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, other-computer-related-services, west-virginia, moderate-value, annual-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $4.7 million to MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY. CJIS ELECTRIC 2026
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MONONGAHELA POWER COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-01-01. End: 2026-12-31.
What specific services are included under the 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code for this contract?
The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is a broad category encompassing a wide array of IT support functions not classified under more specific codes. For the CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract, this could potentially include services such as IT consulting, custom software development, system integration, IT project management, data processing, disaster recovery services, or specialized IT support for the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) systems. Without further details from the contract's statement of work (SOW), it is difficult to pinpoint the exact nature of the services. However, given the context of the FBI and CJIS, it likely involves maintaining, enhancing, or supporting critical IT infrastructure and applications that facilitate information sharing among law enforcement agencies.
What is the justification for awarding this contract as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'?
The designation 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' strongly suggests a sole-source award, meaning only one responsible source was determined to be capable of providing the required services. Common justifications for sole-source procurements include: the existence of only one vendor capable of meeting the requirement (e.g., proprietary technology or unique expertise), urgent and compelling needs where competition is not feasible, or specific national security concerns. For this contract, the specific reason for the sole-source award is not provided in the summary data. A deeper dive into the contract's justification documentation, often found in agency procurement files, would be necessary to understand the rationale behind bypassing a competitive bidding process. This could involve unique infrastructure dependencies, specialized knowledge of the CJIS systems, or a critical, time-sensitive need that precluded a full and open competition.
How does the firm fixed-price contract type impact risk and cost for the government?
A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of cost overruns are manageable. Under an FFP contract, the contractor agrees to a set price for the specified goods or services, regardless of their actual costs incurred. This shifts the primary financial risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. For the government, this provides significant cost certainty and predictability, making budgeting easier. However, if the contractor underestimates costs or encounters unforeseen difficulties, they bear the loss. Conversely, if the contractor performs efficiently and manages costs well, they retain any savings, which can incentivize performance. For the CJIS ELECTRIC 2026 contract, the FFP structure means the Department of Justice knows the total cost upfront, assuming the contractor meets all performance obligations.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar IT services at the FBI or DOJ?
Historical spending on IT services by the FBI and the broader Department of Justice (DOJ) is substantial, reflecting the critical role of technology in modern law enforcement and justice administration. The FBI, in particular, manages vast amounts of data and complex systems like the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS). Annual IT spending across the DOJ often runs into the hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars, covering a wide range of services including software development, hardware procurement, network infrastructure, cybersecurity, and IT support. Contracts for 'Other Computer Related Services' are common, but their individual values can vary significantly based on the specific needs. Without access to detailed historical procurement data for the FBI or DOJ, it's difficult to provide precise figures for comparable contracts. However, a $4.7 million contract for a year of specialized IT services is within the typical range for specific project needs or ongoing support functions within such large agencies.
What are the potential performance risks associated with this contract, given the limited competition?
The primary performance risk associated with a sole-source or limited-competition contract like this is the potential for complacency or reduced incentive for the contractor to perform at their best. When a contractor knows they are the only option, or one of very few, the pressure to innovate, maintain high service levels, and control costs can be diminished compared to a highly competitive environment. Specific risks could include slower response times to issues, less proactive problem-solving, potential quality degradation over time, or difficulty in enforcing stringent performance standards if the contract's Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are not robust. Furthermore, if the contractor faces internal challenges (e.g., staffing issues, financial difficulties), the government has fewer immediate alternatives for recourse or replacement, potentially leading to service disruptions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5001 NASA BLVD, FAIRMONT, WV, 26554
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,745,911
Exercised Options: $4,745,911
Current Obligation: $4,745,911
Actual Outlays: $422,833
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-01-01
Current End Date: 2026-12-31
Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-16
More Contracts from Monongahela Power Company
- Electric Utility Service Morgantown, West Virginia. Igf::ot::igf — $11.9M (Department of Energy)
- Cjis Electrical Utility Contract - FY 25 — $5.3M (Department of Justice)
- FY25- FCC Hazelton, Electric Utility Covered by GSA Areawide Utility Contract Vehicle Funding for October Only While Under CR — $2.2M (Department of Justice)
- FY26 FCC Hazelton, Electric Utility Covered by GSA Areawide Utility Contract Vehicle — $1.8M (Department of Justice)
- FY26 P4 Monpower Electric GC Utility Account #110 088 889 198 Contract # 47PA0418D0034 — $520.2K (Department of Justice)
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)