DOJ's $17.6M Teleradiology Contract Awarded to BCT Partners for FY26 Operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,567 ($17.6K)

Contractor: BCT Partners LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $48/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: TCX / B1 / FY26 / BCT PARTNERS / TELERADIOLOGY

Place of Performance

Location: NEWARK, ESSEX County, NEW JERSEY, 07103

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $17,567.26 to BCT PARTNERS LLC for work described as: TCX / B1 / FY26 / BCT PARTNERS / TELERADIOLOGY Key points: 1. Contract aims to enhance diagnostic imaging services for federal correctional facilities. 2. BCT Partners, a known entity, secured this delivery order under a larger IDIQ. 3. The contract's fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for the government. 4. Performance period spans one fiscal year, requiring timely service delivery. 5. Focus on computer systems design services suggests a technology-centric solution. 6. Geographic focus on New Jersey for service delivery.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $17.6 million for a one-year period appears reasonable for specialized teleradiology services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for medical imaging IT support within federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overruns, but the overall efficiency will depend on the contractor's operational performance and the actual utilization of services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded as a Delivery Order under a Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources. While the initial IDIQ may have been competed broadly, the specific award mechanism suggests that only a limited number of pre-qualified vendors were considered for this particular order, or that specific justifications led to excluding other potential sources. Further details on the IDIQ competition are needed to fully assess the breadth of initial competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition for this specific delivery order may result in less aggressive pricing than a fully open bid, potentially impacting taxpayer savings. However, if the underlying IDIQ was well-competed, the overall value could still be favorable.

Public Impact

Federal inmates will benefit from improved access to teleradiology services, aiding in timely diagnosis and treatment. The contract supports the operational needs of the Bureau of Prisons within the Federal Prison System. Services are primarily focused on facilities located in or serving the New Jersey region. The contract likely supports IT infrastructure and personnel involved in delivering these specialized medical services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the IDIQ is not re-competed broadly.
Dependence on a single vendor for critical diagnostic services could pose a risk.
Ensuring data security and patient privacy for sensitive medical information is paramount.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget predictability.
Award to an established entity suggests a degree of proven capability.
Clear performance period (FY26) allows for focused management and evaluation.

Sector Analysis

The teleradiology market is a growing segment within the broader healthcare IT sector, driven by the need for specialized medical expertise and efficient diagnostic capabilities. Federal agencies, particularly those managing large populations like the Bureau of Prisons, increasingly rely on such services to ensure consistent healthcare standards. This contract fits within the government's strategy to leverage technology for improved healthcare delivery in remote or underserved locations.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from this specific award. The primary contractor, BCT Partners LLC, will be responsible for fulfilling the contract requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, with performance expected to meet defined standards. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Services
Department of Justice IT Modernization Initiatives
Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Services Contracts
Telehealth and Remote Healthcare Delivery Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition impacting price.
Data security and patient privacy risks.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical health services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $17,567.26 to BCT PARTNERS LLC. TCX / B1 / FY26 / BCT PARTNERS / TELERADIOLOGY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BCT PARTNERS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17,567.26.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of BCT Partners LLC in delivering similar teleradiology or healthcare IT services to federal agencies?

BCT Partners LLC has a history of working with government agencies, though specific details on their teleradiology service delivery track record require deeper investigation. Their contract portfolio often includes IT consulting, program management, and data analytics. To assess their suitability for this specific teleradiology contract, a review of past performance evaluations, client references, and any prior experience with medical imaging systems or telehealth platforms would be necessary. Understanding their capacity to manage sensitive patient data and comply with healthcare regulations (like HIPAA) is also crucial. Without specific past performance data related to teleradiology, it's difficult to definitively gauge their expertise in this niche area, although their general government contracting experience is a positive indicator.

How does the $17.6 million value for this one-year contract compare to similar teleradiology service contracts within the federal government?

Benchmarking the $17.6 million value requires comparing it against contracts for similar scope, volume of services, and duration within federal agencies. Teleradiology costs can vary significantly based on the number of studies interpreted, the complexity of cases, the subspecialties required, and the technology platforms used. For a one-year contract, this figure suggests a substantial operational requirement. If this contract covers a large inmate population across multiple facilities, the per-patient or per-study cost might be competitive. However, without access to detailed service level agreements and volume metrics, a precise comparison is challenging. A review of recent awards for similar services to agencies like the VA or DOD could provide a more robust benchmark for assessing value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?

Key risks include potential service disruptions if the contractor faces technical issues or staffing shortages, data security breaches compromising sensitive patient information, and the possibility of the contractor not meeting performance standards for diagnostic accuracy or turnaround times. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust Service Level Agreements (SLAs) with defined penalties for non-performance, stringent data security protocols and audits mandated by the contract, and regular performance monitoring by the Bureau of Prisons. The firm-fixed-price structure also incentivizes the contractor to manage their own operational risks effectively. Furthermore, the contract's duration (one year) allows for periodic reassessment and potential adjustments or re-competition if performance is unsatisfactory.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring competitive pricing for this specific delivery order?

This contracting approach, while originating from a potentially broadly competed IDIQ, introduces a layer of limitation for the specific delivery order. 'Exclusion of Sources' implies that not all potential offerors were considered, possibly due to pre-qualification criteria, specific technical requirements, or other justifications. While it can streamline the award process and ensure vendors meet certain standards, it inherently reduces the pool of competitors compared to a truly open bid. This limitation can potentially lead to less aggressive pricing, as the vendor may face less direct competition for this particular order. The effectiveness in ensuring competitive pricing hinges on the initial breadth of the IDIQ competition and the justification for excluding other sources.

What are the historical spending patterns for teleradiology or similar medical imaging services within the Federal Prison System?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for teleradiology within the Federal Prison System (FPS) is crucial for context. This involves examining previous contract awards for similar services, their values, durations, and the contractors involved. Understanding trends in spending—whether it's increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable—can indicate evolving needs or changes in service delivery models. For instance, a consistent increase in spending might suggest growing demand or rising costs. Conversely, a stable or decreasing trend could point to efficiency gains or a shift in service provision. Comparing current spending ($17.6M for FY26) against past FPS expenditures on teleradiology provides a baseline for assessing the reasonableness of the current investment and identifying any significant deviations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 105 LOCK ST STE 203, NEWARK, NJ, 07103

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,567

Exercised Options: $17,567

Current Obligation: $17,567

Actual Outlays: $2,463

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HHSN316201200074W

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline