Interior Department awards $619K engineering services contract to Stantec Consulting Services Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $619,700 ($619.7K)

Contractor: Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2024-09-20

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 832 days

Daily Burn Rate: $745/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MORA 326194 COMPLIANCE

Place of Performance

Location: ASHFORD, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98304

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $619,700.23 to STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. for work described as: MORA 326194 COMPLIANCE Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for engineering services, a critical component for infrastructure projects. 3. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 4. The duration of 832 days indicates a medium-term project. 5. The award is a delivery order, likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 6. The geographic location of the awardee is Washington state.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $619,700.23 for engineering services over approximately 2.7 years appears reasonable. Without specific deliverables or scope details, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has a clear understanding of the scope and associated costs, which generally leads to better value than cost-reimbursement contracts for well-defined services. Benchmarking against similar engineering service contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of a single award (no: 1) suggests that Stantec Consulting Services Inc. was the most advantageous offer received based on the evaluation criteria. The level of competition, while open, does not specify the number of bids received, which is crucial for a complete understanding of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services. It ensures that the government is not limited to a single provider, maximizing the potential for cost savings.

Public Impact

The National Park Service benefits from this contract through the provision of essential engineering services. These services are likely to support infrastructure maintenance, development, or repair projects within national parks. The contract's impact on the workforce is likely to involve skilled engineers and technical staff employed by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. The geographic impact is primarily within the areas where the National Park Service operates and requires engineering support, potentially across various national park locations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Engineering services, categorized under NAICS code 541330, represent a significant sector within the federal procurement landscape, particularly for agencies managing infrastructure and natural resources like the National Park Service. This sector encompasses a wide range of specialized services including civil, mechanical, electrical, and environmental engineering. Federal spending in this area is often driven by the need for design, planning, and oversight of construction projects, environmental assessments, and facility maintenance. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost of similar engineering service contracts awarded by the Department of the Interior or other agencies with large infrastructure portfolios.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if Stantec Consulting Services Inc. chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans or goals outlined in the award, it is difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem. However, the absence of a set-aside means that larger, established firms were eligible to compete and were awarded the contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract specialist at the Department of the Interior's National Park Service. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to the contract terms would be key aspects of oversight. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-the-interior, national-park-service, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, washington, stante-consulting-services-inc, naics-541330

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $619,700.23 to STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.. MORA 326194 COMPLIANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (National Park Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $619,700.23.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-20. End: 2026-12-31.

What is the track record of Stantec Consulting Services Inc. with the federal government, particularly with the Department of the Interior?

Stantec Consulting Services Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts across various agencies. Analyzing their past performance with the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service specifically would reveal their experience in delivering similar engineering services. This includes examining past contract values, performance reviews, and any instances of disputes or contract modifications. A review of federal procurement data would indicate the frequency and types of services they have provided, helping to assess their suitability and reliability for this current award. Their overall federal contracting history can provide insights into their capacity and expertise in meeting government requirements.

How does the awarded amount compare to the average cost of similar engineering services contracts for the National Park Service?

To benchmark the value of this $619,700.23 contract, one would need to analyze historical data for engineering services procured by the National Park Service (NPS) or the Department of the Interior (DOI) for similar scopes of work. This would involve identifying contracts with comparable NAICS codes (e.g., 541330 - Engineering Services), contract types (e.g., Firm Fixed Price), and durations. Factors such as the specific type of engineering (e.g., civil, structural, environmental), project complexity, and geographic location also influence pricing. Without access to a detailed breakdown of the services to be rendered under this specific contract, a precise comparison is difficult. However, if similar NPS contracts for comparable services typically range significantly higher or lower, it would indicate whether this award represents a particularly good or questionable value.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific engineering services contract?

Key risks for this contract include potential scope creep if the project requirements are not meticulously defined and managed, which could lead to cost overruns or schedule delays, despite the fixed-price nature. Performance risk is also present; if Stantec Consulting Services Inc. fails to deliver quality engineering work or meet deadlines, it could impact the National Park Service's projects. Technical risks related to the complexity of the engineering challenges or unforeseen site conditions could also emerge. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for a defined period introduces a dependency risk. Effective risk mitigation would involve robust contract oversight, clear communication channels, and proactive management of potential issues by both the government and the contractor.

How effective are the oversight mechanisms in place for this contract to ensure successful delivery and taxpayer value?

The effectiveness of oversight for this contract hinges on the diligence of the contracting officer and the assigned contract specialist within the National Park Service. Standard oversight mechanisms include regular progress meetings, review of deliverables, site inspections (if applicable), and performance evaluations. The firm fixed-price contract type provides a degree of cost control, but oversight is still crucial to ensure the quality and completeness of the engineering services rendered. Transparency is generally maintained through public reporting of contract awards. The presence of an Inspector General's office within the Department of the Interior provides an additional layer of accountability, investigating potential fraud, waste, or abuse. The success of these mechanisms depends on adequate resourcing and proactive engagement from the government's contract administration team.

What is the historical spending trend for engineering services by the National Park Service over the last five years?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for engineering services by the National Park Service (NPS) over the last five years would provide context for this $619,700.23 award. This would involve aggregating data on all contracts awarded under relevant NAICS codes (primarily 541330) by the NPS during that period. Key metrics to examine would include the total annual spending, the average contract value, the number of contracts awarded, and the distribution of awards among different types of engineering services. Understanding these trends can reveal whether NPS spending on engineering services is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether this current award is consistent with historical patterns or represents a significant deviation. Such analysis helps in assessing the overall budget allocation and procurement strategy for engineering support.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 140P2024F0299

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Stantec Consulting Michigan Inc.

Address: 410 17TH ST STE 1400, DENVER, CO, 80202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $619,700

Exercised Options: $619,700

Current Obligation: $619,700

Actual Outlays: $398,142

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140P2022D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-09-20

Current End Date: 2026-12-31

Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

View all Stantec Consulting Services Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of the Interior Contracts

View all Department of the Interior contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending