DoD's Air Force Awards $15.3M Engineering Services Contract to DEL-JEN, Inc. for Option Year 4
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,331,807 ($15.3M)
Contractor: Del-Jen, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-02-01
End Date: 2013-07-25
Contract Duration: 2,366 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: EXERCISE THE FINAL OPTION YEAR - OPTION YEAR 4.
Place of Performance
Location: HANSCOM AFB, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01731
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.3 million to DEL-JEN, INC. for work described as: EXERCISE THE FINAL OPTION YEAR - OPTION YEAR 4. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to DEL-JEN, Inc. for engineering services. 2. The contract is for the final option year, indicating a mature service. 3. The award value is $15.3 million. 4. The contract falls under the Engineering Services sector. 5. The procurement method was full and open competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can incentivize performance but requires careful oversight to manage costs effectively. The award value of $15.3 million for the final option year suggests a potentially reasonable price for ongoing services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple vendors have the opportunity to bid.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding for engineering services. The Department of Defense continues to receive engineering support. The contract duration spans over 13 years, indicating long-term reliance on the vendor. The award supports the Air Force's operational needs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contract type requires diligent oversight.
- Long contract duration may warrant review for continued necessity and cost-effectiveness.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Contract is for the final option year, suggesting service maturity.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government infrastructure, defense, and research projects. Spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on project complexity and duration, but competitive awards like this are generally positive.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of a Cost Plus Award Fee contract necessitates strong oversight from the Department of the Air Force to ensure that award fees are justified and that costs remain reasonable and allocable to the contract's objectives.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee.
- No small business awardee.
- Long contract duration (over 13 years total).
- Specific services not detailed.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, ma, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.3 million to DEL-JEN, INC.. EXERCISE THE FINAL OPTION YEAR - OPTION YEAR 4.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEL-JEN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-02-01. End: 2013-07-25.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Air Force's mission objectives?
The provided data identifies the service category as 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330) but does not detail the specific tasks performed. These services likely supported various Air Force programs, potentially including design, analysis, testing, or technical support for aircraft, systems, or infrastructure. Understanding the precise nature of the services is key to assessing their value and impact on mission accomplishment.
Given the Cost Plus Award Fee structure and the contract's long duration, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate cost overruns and ensure performance remains high?
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure inherently involves performance incentives tied to award fees. Effective oversight by the Air Force contracting officers and technical monitors is critical. This includes rigorous evaluation of performance against defined criteria to justify award fees, regular audits of costs, and proactive communication with DEL-JEN, Inc. to address any potential issues early.
How does the $15.3 million award for the final option year compare to industry benchmarks for similar long-term engineering support contracts?
Benchmarking this $15.3 million award requires detailed comparison with contracts for similar engineering services, considering factors like scope, duration, complexity, and the specific agency. While the 'full and open competition' suggests competitive pricing, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure adds complexity. A comprehensive benchmark would involve analyzing historical data for comparable CPAF contracts within the defense sector.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Fluor Corporation (UEI: 006907190)
Address: 28441 HIGHRIDGE RD STE 40, ROLLING HILLS, CA, 36
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,395,140
Exercised Options: $16,395,140
Current Obligation: $15,331,807
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F1965002D0010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-02-01
Current End Date: 2013-07-25
Potential End Date: 2013-07-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-10-29
More Contracts from Del-Jen, Inc.
- 200206!000137!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0010 !A!N! !Y! !20020304!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!n!trend Western Technical Corp !4128 W Commonwealth AVE !fullerton !ca!92833!41704!465!48!laughlin AFB !VAL Verde !texas !+000006310405!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!013!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !Z! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $128.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200203!000084!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20011218!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!n!trend Western Technical Corp !4128 W Commonwealth AVE !fullerton !ca!92833!72875!005!12!tyndall AFB !BAY !florida !+000003253058!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $73.6M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of Albuquerque JC Center — $55.8M (Department of Labor)
- Kittrell JOB Corps Center — $54.9M (Department of Labor)
- Operate the Mississippi JCC — $50.5M (Department of Labor)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)