Facilities support services contract for Nevada valued at $27.2M, awarded to Chugach Support Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,207,404 ($27.2M)
Contractor: Chugach Support Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-10-01
End Date: 2012-09-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $74.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OPTION YEAR NINE, ANNEXES 1-15
Place of Performance
Location: FALLON, CHURCHILL County, NEVADA, 89496
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.2 million to CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: OPTION YEAR NINE, ANNEXES 1-15 Key points: 1. The contract's value of $27.2 million over its base period suggests a significant investment in facilities maintenance. 2. Awarded as 'Not Available for Competition', this indicates potential limitations in market availability or specific contractor capabilities. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 4. The duration of 365 days for this delivery order suggests it's a discrete task within a larger framework. 5. The primary service area is Nevada, implying a localized impact on facilities management. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210 points to comprehensive facilities support services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order against similar facilities support contracts requires more granular data on the scope of services provided. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. However, without details on the specific services rendered (e.g., janitorial, groundskeeping, minor repairs), a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The contract's base period of one year limits the scope for long-term value analysis.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as 'Not Available for Competition', which is a type of sole-source procurement. This typically occurs when only one responsible source is available or when a compelling urgency dictates a non-competitive award. The lack of open competition means that the government did not benefit from a bidding process that could drive down prices through market forces. The justification for this award type would need to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it was appropriate.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms is also reduced in sole-source situations.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from the provision of essential facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. The contract supports the maintenance and upkeep of government facilities located in Nevada. Local workforce in Nevada may be impacted through employment opportunities related to facilities management. The services delivered are crucial for the day-to-day functioning and safety of the facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced incentive for contractor efficiency.
- The 'Not Available for Competition' status requires scrutiny to ensure it was justified and not a missed opportunity for broader market engagement.
- Limited transparency into the specific services and performance metrics makes it difficult to fully assess value and effectiveness.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
- Awarding to Chugach Support Services, Inc. suggests a potentially established relationship or recognized capability for these services.
- The contract supports critical government facility operations, ensuring continuity.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, is a broad sector encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and other real property. This includes activities such as janitorial services, security systems services, and grounds maintenance. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, contracting for the upkeep of military bases, office buildings, and other installations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed against the total value of federal contracts awarded under this NAICS code annually, which runs into billions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary consideration for this specific award, as neither a small business set-aside nor subcontracting goals appear to be explicitly stated. This suggests that the contract was likely awarded to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses to participate as prime contractors or subcontractors may be limited unless independently pursued by the prime contractor. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the contracting agency, the Department of the Navy, and potentially the Department of Defense's Inspector General. Accountability measures are generally embedded within the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to satisfactory service delivery. Transparency is often facilitated through contract databases and reporting requirements, though the specifics of this delivery order's oversight mechanisms are not detailed in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Base Operations Support Services
- Government Property Management
- Logistics and Support Services
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award requires justification.
- Potential for uncompetitive pricing.
- Scope of services not fully detailed.
- Performance history of contractor not provided.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, nevada, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, facilities-management, chugach-support-services-inc, naics-561210
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.2 million to CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.. OPTION YEAR NINE, ANNEXES 1-15
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-10-01. End: 2012-09-30.
What specific facilities support services are included under this contract?
The provided data identifies the contract under NAICS code 561210, which covers Facilities Support Services. However, the specific breakdown of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, landscaping, security, pest control, waste management) is not detailed in the summary data. These services are crucial for the upkeep and operational readiness of government facilities. A comprehensive understanding of the contract's scope would require reviewing the full contract documentation, including annexes, to ascertain the precise deliverables and performance standards expected from Chugach Support Services, Inc.
How does the $27.2 million value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?
Direct comparison of the $27.2 million value for this single delivery order is challenging without knowing the exact duration and scope of services. However, the Department of the Navy awards numerous contracts for facilities support services annually, often in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars across various bases and installations. This $27.2 million figure represents a significant, but likely localized, investment for the specified period. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare it against contracts of similar duration and service complexity within the same geographic region or for comparable facility types.
What are the risks associated with a 'Not Available for Competition' award for facilities support services?
The primary risk of a 'Not Available for Competition' (sole-source) award is the potential for reduced value for money. Without competitive bidding, the government may pay higher prices than if multiple vendors had vied for the contract. There's also a reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve efficiency, as market pressure is absent. Furthermore, it raises questions about whether the government adequately explored all potential sources or if there were legitimate, documented reasons for limiting competition. This procurement method requires strong justification to ensure taxpayer funds are used responsibly.
What is the track record of Chugach Support Services, Inc. in performing federal facilities support contracts?
Chugach Support Services, Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to facilities support and base operations. Their performance record can be assessed by reviewing past contract awards, performance evaluations (such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented disputes or contract modifications. A positive performance history suggests a lower risk for this current contract, while a history of issues would warrant closer scrutiny of oversight and performance management. Without access to specific performance data for this contractor, a definitive assessment is not possible from the provided summary.
What are the implications of this contract being a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) type?
A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government as it shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. The price is set and not subject to adjustment unless specific contract clauses allow for it (e.g., economic price adjustments). This provides budget certainty for the government. For the contractor, it incentivizes efficient performance to maximize profit. In the context of facilities support services, FFP works well when the scope of work is clearly defined and unlikely to change significantly, allowing the contractor to accurately estimate costs.
How does the geographic focus on Nevada impact the contract's administration and oversight?
Focusing on Nevada means that contract administration and oversight activities, such as site inspections, performance monitoring, and communication with the contractor, will be concentrated within that state. This can streamline oversight if the facilities are co-located or easily accessible. However, it also means that the contracting officer's representatives (CORs) and other oversight personnel must have a strong presence or effective remote monitoring capabilities in Nevada. The specific geographic concentration can simplify logistics but requires dedicated resources within that region to ensure effective management and compliance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 560 EAST 34TH AVENUE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,207,404
Exercised Options: $27,207,404
Current Obligation: $27,207,404
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N4425502D9000
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-10-01
Current End Date: 2012-09-30
Potential End Date: 2012-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-18
More Contracts from Chugach Support Services, Inc.
- 200211!000391!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0024 !A!N! !Y! !20020801!20020930!608253824!608253824!071844021!n!chugach Support Services, Inc !560 East 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!72875!005!12!tyndall AFB !BAY !florida !+000000079752!n!n!000000000000!m152!operation/Maintenance Buildings !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!l!1!001!n!5a!c!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $171.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!140461!1700!n62473!navfac Southwest !N4425502D9000 !A!N! !Y!FB00 !92 !20051001!20040930!608253824!608253824!071844021!n!chugach Support Services, Inc !560 E 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!24500!001!32!fallon NAS !churchill !nevada !+000023738253!n!n!000000000000!s216!facilities Operations Support Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !561210!E! !5!B!S!C! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!j!1!001!n!5a!c!n!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1725!N60495!0001! ! — $96.1M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $74.9M (Department of Defense)
- Option Year 7, FFP Annexes 1-15 FY 10 Fund Obligation — $29.2M (Department of Defense)
- Option Year 8, FFP, Annexes 1-15 — $28.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)