DoD's $29.16M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Chugach Support Services, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,164,036 ($29.2M)
Contractor: Chugach Support Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-28
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 367 days
Daily Burn Rate: $79.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OPTION YEAR 7, FFP ANNEXES 1-15 FY 10 FUND OBLIGATION
Place of Performance
Location: FALLON, CHURCHILL County, NEVADA, 89496
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.2 million to CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: OPTION YEAR 7, FFP ANNEXES 1-15 FY 10 FUND OBLIGATION Key points: 1. The contract value represents a significant investment in facilities maintenance and support for the Department of the Navy. 2. The award was made under a 'Not Available for Competition' justification, indicating limited or no competitive bidding. 3. The duration of the base period is approximately one year, with potential for option years. 4. The contractor, Chugach Support Services, Inc., has a track record with federal contracts, requiring further analysis of performance. 5. The Facilities Support Services sector is crucial for operational readiness and infrastructure management within the DoD. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor but requires careful scope definition.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. The firm fixed-price structure suggests a defined scope, but the lack of competition raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible price. Comparing this to similar facilities support contracts across different DoD branches or agencies would be necessary to assess value for money. The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or historical cost trends for this contractor, making a definitive value assessment difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded under a 'Not Available for Competition' (NAF) justification, meaning it was not openly competed. This typically occurs when only one source is capable of meeting the requirement, or in specific circumstances like follow-on work to a previous contract where competition was not feasible. The limited competition suggests a potential lack of price discovery and may result in higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure. The government did not leverage the market's full potential to drive down costs for these essential facilities support services.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from essential facilities maintenance and support services, ensuring operational readiness. The contract supports the upkeep of critical infrastructure, contributing to the overall mission effectiveness of naval installations. The geographic impact is localized to the specific Navy installations where Chugach Support Services, Inc. is providing services. The contract likely has implications for the civilian workforce employed in facilities management and support roles at these installations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to inflated pricing.
- Performance history of Chugach Support Services, Inc. needs thorough review to ensure quality and reliability.
- Scope creep is a risk in fixed-price contracts if not managed meticulously.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities support can create operational vulnerabilities.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract structure provides cost certainty if scope is well-defined.
- Award to an established contractor may indicate a level of confidence in their capabilities.
- Focus on facilities support ensures essential infrastructure is maintained.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services essential for the operation and maintenance of government and commercial facilities. This includes maintenance, repair, custodial services, groundskeeping, and more. The market is characterized by a mix of large, diversified service providers and smaller, specialized firms. Federal spending in this sector is substantial, driven by the vast real estate holdings of agencies like the Department of Defense. Benchmarking requires comparing contract values against the scope of services, geographic location, and specific agency needs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Chugach Support Services, Inc., is likely a larger entity. Analysis of their subcontracting plans, if any, would be necessary to understand their impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Navy program management office. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's performance work statement (PWS) and terms. Transparency is often limited for 'Not Available for Competition' awards, but contract details should be publicly available through federal procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Navy Base Operations Support
- Government Facilities Management Services
- Contracting for Base Support Services
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may result in higher costs.
- Contractor performance history requires verification.
- Lack of detailed service scope and performance metrics hinders value assessment.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, facilities-maintenance, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, option-year-7, chugach-support-services-inc, nevada, non-competitive
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.2 million to CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.. OPTION YEAR 7, FFP ANNEXES 1-15 FY 10 FUND OBLIGATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH SUPPORT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-28. End: 2010-09-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at this specific Navy installation or command?
Analyzing historical spending for facilities support services at the specific Navy installation or command is crucial for context. Without this data, it's difficult to determine if the current $29.16 million award represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Historical data can reveal trends in contract values, identify potential cost overruns or savings over time, and highlight any shifts in the scope or nature of services procured. Understanding past expenditures also helps in assessing whether the current contract is competitively priced relative to its predecessors and if the government has achieved better value in previous periods. This analysis would involve reviewing past solicitations, awards, and contract modifications for similar services at the same location.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by other branches of the military?
Comparing the per-unit cost of services under this contract to similar facilities support contracts awarded by other military branches is essential for value assessment. This requires identifying comparable contracts based on service type (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping), geographic location, and contract size. If this contract's per-unit costs for specific services are significantly higher than benchmarks from, for example, the Army or Air Force, it could indicate potential overpricing or inefficiencies. Conversely, lower costs might suggest effective negotiation or a more competitive bidding process in those other instances. The 'Not Available for Competition' status of this award makes such comparisons particularly important to ensure the government is not disadvantaged by the lack of a competitive environment.
What is the track record of Chugach Support Services, Inc. in performing similar facilities support contracts for the federal government, specifically regarding performance ratings and past disputes?
Evaluating the track record of Chugach Support Services, Inc. is critical, especially given the sole-source nature of this award. This involves reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports) for similar federal contracts, looking for consistent high ratings, or identifying any recurring issues. Information on past contract disputes, claims, or litigation involving the company can also provide insights into potential risks. A history of strong performance and minimal disputes suggests a lower risk profile for this contract. Conversely, a pattern of poor performance or unresolved issues would raise significant concerns about the contractor's ability to meet the requirements effectively and efficiently, potentially impacting mission readiness and taxpayer value.
What specific facilities support services are included in this contract, and how are they measured for performance and effectiveness?
A detailed breakdown of the specific facilities support services covered under this $29.16 million contract is necessary for a comprehensive analysis. This includes understanding the scope of work, such as custodial services, maintenance, repair, landscaping, pest control, and security. Equally important is understanding the performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to measure the contractor's effectiveness. Without clear, measurable standards defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), it is difficult to assess whether the government is receiving adequate value for its investment. Effective oversight requires robust mechanisms to track service delivery, quality, and responsiveness against these defined metrics.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The justification for awarding this contract on a 'Not Available for Competition' (sole-source) basis is a key area for scrutiny. Federal procurement regulations allow for sole-source awards under specific circumstances, such as when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or in cases of urgent and compelling need. Understanding the precise justification provided by the Department of the Navy is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to ascertain whether alternative competitive strategies were explored or considered before resorting to a sole-source award. A thorough review would determine if the justification was robust and if the government adequately explored options to foster competition, which is generally preferred to ensure best value for taxpayers.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 560 EAST 34TH AVENUE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: Category Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,164,036
Exercised Options: $29,164,036
Current Obligation: $29,164,036
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N4425502D9000
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-28
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-09-25
More Contracts from Chugach Support Services, Inc.
- 200211!000391!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0024 !A!N! !Y! !20020801!20020930!608253824!608253824!071844021!n!chugach Support Services, Inc !560 East 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!72875!005!12!tyndall AFB !BAY !florida !+000000079752!n!n!000000000000!m152!operation/Maintenance Buildings !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!l!1!001!n!5a!c!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $171.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200612!140461!1700!n62473!navfac Southwest !N4425502D9000 !A!N! !Y!FB00 !92 !20051001!20040930!608253824!608253824!071844021!n!chugach Support Services, Inc !560 E 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!24500!001!32!fallon NAS !churchill !nevada !+000023738253!n!n!000000000000!s216!facilities Operations Support Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !561210!E! !5!B!S!C! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!n!j!1!001!n!5a!c!n!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !d!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1725!N60495!0001! ! — $96.1M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $74.9M (Department of Defense)
- Option Year 8, FFP, Annexes 1-15 — $28.9M (Department of Defense)
- Option Year Nine, Annexes 1-15 — $27.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)