DoD's $31.2M Contract with Stanley Associates for Services: Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $31,230,790 ($31.2M)

Contractor: Stanley Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-08-01

End Date: 2005-12-31

Contract Duration: 883 days

Daily Burn Rate: $35.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30330

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $31.2 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract awarded to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. totals $31,230,790.43. 2. This award utilized full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 4. The contract duration is 883 days, indicating a medium-term engagement for services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure allows for cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee, which can incentivize contractors to control costs. However, it also carries a risk of cost escalation if the fixed fee is not adequately tied to performance or if initial cost estimates are inaccurate.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, as multiple bidders are encouraged to submit proposals. This typically leads to more competitive pricing compared to limited or sole-source procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the services rendered, as multiple companies vied for the contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that aims to secure the best value. The Department of the Army receives specialized services through this contract. Stanley Associates, Inc. gains significant revenue and a contract award from a major government agency. The duration of the contract impacts resource allocation and planning for both the agency and the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under general services procurement within the Department of Defense. Benchmarking requires specific service category data, but the award amount is moderate for a multi-year federal service contract.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that the prime contractor is Stanley Associates, Inc. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting to small businesses for this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting adherence to standard procurement regulations. Oversight would typically involve monitoring contract performance, costs, and adherence to the fixed fee structure by the Department of the Army.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $31.2 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $31.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-08-01. End: 2005-12-31.

What specific services were procured under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Army's mission requirements?

The provided data does not specify the exact services procured. Understanding the nature of these services is crucial for assessing their necessity and alignment with the Department of the Army's strategic objectives. Without this information, it's difficult to determine if the $31.2 million expenditure represents optimal value for the intended mission support.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) and how was the contractor's performance evaluated under the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure?

The data does not detail the specific KPIs or performance evaluation metrics used for this contract. For Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts, effective oversight is critical to ensure the contractor meets performance standards while managing costs. A lack of transparency on performance evaluation raises concerns about accountability and the potential for inefficient service delivery.

How did the competitive bidding process under 'full and open competition' ensure the most cost-effective solution for the government?

Full and open competition generally promotes cost-effectiveness by allowing multiple vendors to bid, driving down prices. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure itself can introduce complexities. The effectiveness of the competition in securing the best value depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the government's ability to negotiate favorable terms within the fee structure.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Groupe CGI Inc (UEI: 246801237)

Address: 300 N WASHINGTON ST, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAKF1199D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-08-01

Current End Date: 2005-12-31

Potential End Date: 2005-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-10-17

More Contracts from Stanley Associates, Inc.

View all Stanley Associates, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending