HHS awarded $9.8M for ADP systems analysis, with Wyle Information Systems serving as contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,834,930 ($9.8M)

Contractor: Wyle Information Systems, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Health and Human Services

Start Date: 2002-05-08

End Date: 2008-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,245 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20852

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Health and Human Services obligated $9.8 million to WYLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, LLC for work described as: ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $9.8M over six years suggests a moderate annual spend. 2. The contract was awarded via a competitive delivery order, indicating some level of market engagement. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty but could limit flexibility for evolving needs. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to a broad IT services category. 5. The contract duration of approximately six years is typical for complex IT support services. 6. The small business set-aside status is false, suggesting larger firms were likely involved.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $9.8 million over six years averages to approximately $1.6 million annually. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar ADP systems analysis contracts would require more granular data on the scope of services provided. The fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to control costs, but the overall value is contingent on the quality and impact of the analysis delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, implying that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full-and-open' competition designation suggests a robust process. This level of competition is generally expected to drive more competitive pricing and encourage vendors to offer their best value propositions.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process is beneficial for taxpayers as it helps ensure that the government is not overpaying for services and that the most capable and cost-effective vendor is selected.

Public Impact

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) benefits from this contract by receiving support for analyzing its Automated Data Processing (ADP) systems. Services delivered likely include system assessments, recommendations for improvement, and potentially support for modernization efforts. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland, where the FDA's operations are concentrated. Workforce implications may involve specialized IT analysts and consultants contributing to the FDA's technological infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to gauge the effectiveness of the ADP systems analysis.
The broad NAICS code (541519) could encompass a wide range of services, making it hard to pinpoint the exact value delivered.
Fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to scope creep or quality compromises if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive delivery order, indicating potential for good pricing and vendor selection.
The six-year duration suggests a stable, long-term need for these critical IT analysis services.
The contract is with a known entity, Wyle Information Systems, LLC, implying established capabilities.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the broader Information Technology (IT) services sector, specifically focusing on IT consulting and systems analysis. The market for such services is large and competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in ADP systems. The annual spend of approximately $1.6 million is moderate within the context of large federal IT procurements, suggesting a focused scope of work rather than a comprehensive IT overhaul.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This indicates that the procurement was open to all eligible vendors, including large businesses. Consequently, the primary contractor, Wyle Information Systems, LLC, is likely a larger entity. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could represent a missed opportunity for small business participation in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically reside within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The contract's fixed-price nature provides some level of cost control. Accountability would be managed through contract performance reviews and adherence to the terms of the delivery order. Transparency is generally facilitated by federal procurement databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Federal IT Consulting Services
ADP System Modernization
IT Infrastructure Support
Health IT Services
Government IT Services

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics
Broad service category (NAICS 541519)
Limited public detail on deliverables

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Health and Human Services awarded $9.8 million to WYLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, LLC. ADP SYSTEMS ANALYSIS SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WYLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Health and Human Services (Food and Drug Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-05-08. End: 2008-06-30.

What specific ADP systems were analyzed under this contract, and what were the key findings or recommendations?

The provided data does not specify which particular Automated Data Processing (ADP) systems were analyzed under this $9.8 million contract awarded to Wyle Information Systems, LLC by the FDA. The scope of 'ADP Systems Analysis Services' is broad and could encompass anything from legacy system evaluations to recommendations for cloud migration or new software implementations. Key findings and recommendations are typically detailed in internal FDA reports and are not publicly disclosed in contract award data. Without access to these deliverables, it's impossible to assess the direct impact or success of the analysis performed. Future analysis should seek to uncover performance reports or program reviews related to this contract to understand the tangible outcomes.

How does the annual average cost of approximately $1.6 million compare to similar IT analysis contracts within the federal government?

The average annual cost of approximately $1.6 million for ADP systems analysis services is moderate within the federal IT contracting landscape. Larger, more complex IT modernization or enterprise-wide system analysis contracts can easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Conversely, smaller, highly specialized consulting engagements might be in the hundreds of thousands. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this contract against others with similar scopes of work, such as system audits, requirements gathering for specific applications, or performance optimization studies, awarded by agencies of comparable size and complexity to the FDA. The 'full-and-open' competition suggests a standard service offering, which typically aligns with market rates.

What is Wyle Information Systems, LLC's track record with federal IT service contracts, particularly with the FDA?

Wyle Information Systems, LLC (now part of KBR) has a history of performing various IT and engineering services for the federal government. While the provided data confirms their role as the contractor for this specific $9.8 million ADP systems analysis contract with the FDA, a comprehensive assessment of their track record would require examining their entire contract portfolio. This includes looking at past performance evaluations, any past performance issues or awards, and the types of services they have delivered to the FDA and other agencies. Their ability to secure a competitive delivery order suggests they met the government's requirements at the time of award. Further investigation into their performance on similar contracts would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and expertise in IT analysis.

Given the fixed-price contract type, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential scope creep or ensure the quality of analysis delivered?

Fixed-price contracts, like this one, aim to establish a set cost for a defined scope of work. To manage scope creep and ensure quality, the FDA would have relied on robust contract management practices. This typically involves clearly defined Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) documents, regular progress meetings between the FDA contracting officer's representative (COR) and Wyle Information Systems, and detailed acceptance criteria for deliverables. Any deviation from the original scope would require a formal contract modification, often involving price adjustments. Quality assurance would be monitored through performance metrics outlined in the contract, if any, and through the COR's oversight of the work performed. The success of a fixed-price contract heavily depends on the clarity of the initial requirements and the diligence of contract administration.

What has been the historical spending trend for ADP systems analysis services at the FDA or HHS?

The provided data only details a single contract award of $9.8 million for ADP systems analysis services to Wyle Information Systems, LLC from 2002 to 2008. It does not offer insight into the historical spending trends for such services at the FDA or the broader Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). To understand historical spending, one would need to analyze procurement data over multiple fiscal years, identifying all contracts related to ADP systems analysis, IT consulting, and related services across the agency. This would involve looking at spending patterns, identifying key contractors, and observing any shifts in technology or service needs that influenced procurement volumes and types over time.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Court Square Capital Partners, L.P. (UEI: 610537735)

Address: 1651 OLD MEADOW RD FL 5, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,417,200

Exercised Options: $9,834,930

Current Obligation: $9,834,930

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F5355H

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline