DoD's $30.3M Remediation Services Contract for St. Louis North County FUSRAP Project Awarded to Shaw Environmental, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,315,659 ($30.3M)
Contractor: Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-02-13
End Date: 2013-02-12
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ST. LOUIS NORTH COUNTY FUSRAP PROJECT - TERC CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: SAINT LOUIS, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63132
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.3 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. for work described as: ST. LOUIS NORTH COUNTY FUSRAP PROJECT - TERC CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 5 years indicates a significant, long-term commitment for remediation services. 3. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs and transfer risk to the contractor. 4. The contract falls under the Remediation Services NAICS code, indicating specialized environmental cleanup. 5. Awarded by the Department of the Army, highlighting defense-related environmental management needs. 6. The project is located in St. Louis, Missouri, with specific geographic implications.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns or comparable project data. However, the firm-fixed-price contract type suggests an attempt to establish a predictable cost ceiling. The total award amount of $30.3 million over five years averages to approximately $6 million annually, which for a large-scale environmental remediation project, may represent a reasonable investment depending on the scope and complexity of the FUSRAP site. Further analysis would require comparing unit costs for specific remediation activities against industry standards.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this specialized environmental remediation service. A competitive bidding process generally helps in achieving fair market prices and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down costs through market forces, ensuring that the government receives the most cost-effective solution for environmental cleanup.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the residents and environment of St. Louis, Missouri, through the cleanup of Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). The contract delivers essential environmental remediation services, addressing potential contamination from past military activities. The geographic impact is concentrated in the St. Louis North County area, Missouri. The contract supports a specialized workforce in environmental engineering, hazardous waste management, and site remediation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions are more extensive than anticipated, despite the fixed-price structure.
- Dependence on contractor performance for timely and effective cleanup, with potential delays impacting project completion.
- Environmental risks associated with handling and disposing of hazardous materials during the remediation process.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract helps in budget predictability and cost control.
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market and potentially better pricing.
- Long contract duration allows for sustained focus and completion of complex remediation tasks.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation sector is a critical component of the broader construction and professional services industries. This contract falls under the Remediation Services (NAICS 562910) category, which includes establishments primarily engaged in cleaning up sites contaminated with pollution or other hazardous materials. The market for environmental remediation is driven by regulatory requirements, historical land use (like FUDS), and increasing environmental awareness. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale environmental cleanup contracts awarded by federal agencies for similar types of contamination.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Shaw Environmental, Inc., is likely a large business. While there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, large federal contracts often include provisions for small business participation. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the competition was open to all qualified bidders, and the focus was on securing the best technical and price proposal, regardless of business size.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army, likely through contracting officers and technical representatives who monitor performance against contract requirements. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including delivery schedules and quality standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS-NG. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUSRAP) Program
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Department of Defense Contracts
- Army Corps of Engineers Projects
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Contractor performance risk in executing complex remediation tasks.
- Environmental compliance and regulatory adherence.
Tags
sector-other, agency-department-of-defense, agency-department-of-the-army, geography-missouri, geography-st-louis, contract-type-firm-fixed-price, competition-level-full-and-open, size-category-large-business, service-type-remediation-services, program-fusrap
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.3 million to SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.. ST. LOUIS NORTH COUNTY FUSRAP PROJECT - TERC CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-02-13. End: 2013-02-12.
What is the historical spending trend for St. Louis North County FUSRAP projects under Shaw Environmental, Inc.?
Analyzing historical spending for this specific St. Louis North County FUSRAP project under Shaw Environmental, Inc. requires access to detailed contract modification data and historical award information beyond the initial award details provided. The initial award was for $30,315,659 with an estimated duration of 1826 days (approximately 5 years). Without access to subsequent delivery orders, task orders, or modifications, it's impossible to determine the exact cumulative spending or spending trends over the contract's life. However, the initial award amount suggests a significant budget allocation for the project. To understand spending trends, one would need to examine the disbursement of funds across the contract's performance period and compare it to the planned budget and scope of work.
How does the per-unit cost of remediation services in this contract compare to industry benchmarks?
Determining the per-unit cost of remediation services for this contract and comparing it to industry benchmarks is not feasible with the provided data. The contract details lack specific line items for different remediation activities (e.g., soil excavation, groundwater treatment, hazardous material disposal) and their associated unit costs. Shaw Environmental, Inc. would have submitted a detailed cost proposal, but this is typically proprietary. To perform such a comparison, one would need access to the contractor's unit pricing for specific tasks and then benchmark these against publicly available cost data for similar remediation projects in the St. Louis region or nationally, considering factors like contaminant type, volume, and complexity.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Shaw Environmental, Inc.'s performance on this FUSRAP project?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a contract like the St. Louis North County FUSRAP Project would typically be defined within the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). Common KPIs for environmental remediation contracts include adherence to project schedules, compliance with environmental regulations and safety standards, quality of work (e.g., effectiveness of contaminant removal), waste management protocols, and reporting accuracy. Performance would likely be monitored through regular progress reports, site inspections, and potentially independent environmental sampling. Failure to meet these KPIs could result in contractual remedies, including financial penalties or termination.
What is the potential environmental risk associated with this FUSRAP site, and how does the contract address it?
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUSRAP) are locations where the Army or Air Force carried out activities that may have resulted in radioactive material or hazardous/toxic chemical contamination. The specific environmental risks at the St. Louis North County site would depend on the nature of the past military activities (e.g., ordnance manufacturing, chemical processing, radioactive material handling). The contract addresses these risks by tasking Shaw Environmental, Inc. with performing comprehensive site investigation, risk assessment, and remediation activities to reduce or eliminate unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. The scope of work would detail the cleanup objectives, methods, and final cleanup standards to be achieved.
How many other FUSRAP projects has the Department of the Army awarded to Shaw Environmental, Inc. in the past five years?
To determine the number of other FUSRAP projects the Department of the Army has awarded to Shaw Environmental, Inc. in the past five years, a search of federal procurement databases (like FPDS-NG or SAM.gov) would be necessary. This search would filter contracts awarded by the Department of the Army to Shaw Environmental, Inc. within the specified timeframe and categorize them by program or service type, specifically looking for FUSRAP-related contracts. Without performing this specific database query, it is not possible to provide an exact number. However, large environmental firms often hold multiple contracts with various government agencies for similar services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.
Address: 11206 THOMPSON AVE, LENEXA, KS, 66219
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $39,183,286
Exercised Options: $39,183,286
Current Obligation: $30,315,659
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DACW4198D9006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-02-13
Current End Date: 2013-02-12
Potential End Date: 2013-02-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-04-20
More Contracts from Shaw Environmental, Inc.
- Maintenance for Travel Trailers and Manufactured Homes; Identify and Provide Temporary Housing Solutions for People Displaced Because of Hurricane Katrina - Inspections of Sites Identified by Fema for Placement of Temporary Shelters, Including Travel Trailers (TT) and Manufactured Homes (MH), and Park Models (PM) — $430.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
- THE Contractor Shall Perform ALL the Necessary Work and Services Required for Continued Construction Activities of Remedial Action for the Removal of Radioactive Contaminated Waste Located AT the Maywood Superfund Site, Maywood, NEW Jersey. This Task Order Award IS for the Negotiated Work and Services in Accordance With the Statement of Work in the Request for Proposal Dated 12 June 2008, General Decision Number NJ080003 Dated 5 December 2008, Service Contract ACT Wage Determination Number 2005-2347 Revision 6 Dated 11 September 2008 and With the Attached Authority to Proceed #255 Dated 10 December 2008 — $182.1M (Department of Defense)
- 200409!000634!96ce!w912dq!usa Engineer District Kansas Cty!dacw4199d9001 !A!N! !N!0003 ! !20040224!20060331!085333792!085333792!180038382!n!shaw Environmental, Inc !250 W 34TH ST !NEW York !ny!10119!44880!003!34!maywood !bergen !NEW Jersey!+000005500000!n!n!000000000000!f108!hazardous Substance Removal/Cleanup/Disposal Svcs !S1 !services !ZBC !brac !562910!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !a!u!u!2!006!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $122.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200405!000279!5700!GW05 !hsw/Pkv !FA890304D8676 !A!N! !N!0008 ! !20040128!20050115!083760293!109514559!180038382!n!shaw Environmental, Inc !8081 Royal Ridge Parkway, !irving !TX!75063!00000! !IZ!* !* !iraq !+000046749910!n!n!000000000000!c219!other Architect & Engineering Services !C2 !construction !ZOP !* !562910!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!006!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $90.8M (Department of Defense)
- Fema Requires Manufactured Housing Unit (MHU) Haul and Install-Related Activities in Support of Dr-4277-La, ANY Declared Parish in Louisiana. However, Fema Anticipates That the Majority of Haul and Install Activities, Especially in the Initial Stages of the Mission, Will BE Conducted in the Following (10) Parishes: East Baton Rouge, Livingston, ST. Helena, East Feliciana, Evangeline, ST. Landry, ST. Martin, ST. Tammany, Washington, Tangipahoa — $89.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)