DoD Awards $13M Contract to Computer Sciences Corporation for Policy Review Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,966,569 ($13.0M)

Contractor: Csra Information Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-06-29

End Date: 2005-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,677 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200009!2100!003345!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0700DE252 !A!*!0016 !20000629!20010906!043991108!009581091!009581091!N!52939!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !0001!+000001250816!N!N!000000000000!R406!POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !1AHA!UH-1 IROQUOIS !3728!5!A!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!Y!2!002!B!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!

Place of Performance

Location: ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21005

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.0 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: 200009!2100!003345!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0700DE252 !A!*!0016 !20000629!20010906!043991108!009581091!009581091!N!52939!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FAL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Computer Sciences Corporation for policy review and development services. 2. The contract value is $12,966,569. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Services fall under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), with a specific PSC code R406. 5. The contract duration is over 5 years, indicating a long-term need.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.97 million over 5 years is substantial. Benchmarking against similar policy review contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the duration suggests a significant investment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The use of Time and Materials pricing could introduce cost variability.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best value. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Policy development and review are critical functions for government agencies, impacting strategic direction. The award to a large contractor like Computer Sciences Corporation suggests a need for significant resources and expertise. The duration of the contract implies ongoing government requirements in this area. The specific services provided could influence various government programs and operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 77 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Long contract duration may not adapt well to evolving policy needs.
Lack of specific service details makes it hard to assess true value.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition is a positive signal for value.
Award to a known entity like CSC suggests capability.
Clear contract end date provides a review point.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Engineering Services, specifically policy review and development. Spending in this sector often supports strategic planning and regulatory compliance within government agencies. Benchmarks are difficult without more granular data on policy services.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Computer Sciences Corporation, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors in this specific award, which is a missed opportunity for small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a structured procurement process. Oversight would focus on performance against contract requirements and managing the Time and Materials aspect to control costs.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Risk of services becoming outdated if policy needs shift significantly.
Lack of transparency on specific policy areas and performance metrics.
Limited visibility into small business subcontracting opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.0 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC. 200009!2100!003345!AB07 !USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !DAAB0700DE252 !A!*!0016 !20000629!20010906!043991108!009581091!009581091!N!52939!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!27200!610!51!FALLS CHURCH !FALLS CHURCH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !0001!+000001250816!N!N!000000000000!R406!POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES !A1A!AIRFRAMES AND SPARES !1AHA!UH-1 IROQUOIS !3728!5!A!S!*!B!A!*!A !N!Y!

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-06-29. End: 2005-01-31.

What specific policy areas are covered by this contract, and how do they align with current DoD priorities?

The data indicates the contract is for 'POLICY REVIEW/DEVELOPMENT SERVICES' under PSC R406. Without further details, it's impossible to specify the exact policy areas. These could range from strategic planning and resource allocation to regulatory compliance or operational procedures. Alignment with DoD priorities would depend on the specific nature of the policies being reviewed or developed.

How does the Time and Materials pricing structure mitigate risks associated with evolving policy needs over the contract's duration?

Time and Materials (T&M) pricing allows for flexibility as policy needs evolve, as the government pays for actual labor hours and material costs incurred. However, it also introduces risk of cost overruns if not closely monitored. Effective oversight, including detailed cost tracking and performance metrics, is crucial to ensure the government receives value and that costs remain within reasonable bounds despite the adaptive nature of T&M.

What performance metrics are in place to ensure the effectiveness of the policy review and development services provided?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics. However, for effective policy review and development, metrics would typically include timeliness of deliverables, quality of analysis, adherence to scope, stakeholder satisfaction, and the successful implementation or impact of developed policies. Robust contract management and regular performance reviews are essential to ensure these services meet the DoD's objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Dyncorp

Address: 13857 MCLEAREN RD, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAB0700DE252

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline