Air Force Medical Design-Build IDIQ awarded to StructSure Projects Inc. for $17.3M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,330,124 ($17.3M)
Contractor: Structsure Projects Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-09-30
End Date: 2009-11-11
Contract Duration: 1,138 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: IDIQ FOR AIR FORCE MEDICAL DESIGN-BUILD
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRCHILD AFB, SPOKANE County, WASHINGTON, 99011
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.3 million to STRUCTSURE PROJECTS INC for work described as: IDIQ FOR AIR FORCE MEDICAL DESIGN-BUILD Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The contract duration was 1138 days, indicating a medium-term project. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army, indicating inter-service collaboration or support. 6. The contract was awarded in Washington state, suggesting a specific geographic focus for the medical facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this $17.3 million contract is challenging without specific project details or comparable contract data. However, the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) award type generally indicates that the government sought predictable costs. The duration of 1138 days suggests a substantial project, and the absence of reported overruns or significant modifications (based on available data) might imply reasonable cost management. Further analysis would require comparing the per-square-foot cost or cost per facility to similar medical construction projects.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The fact that it was competed broadly suggests that the Department of the Army sought to maximize value and innovation by engaging the widest possible pool of qualified contractors for these medical design-build services.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through robust bidding and ensuring that the government secures services at a fair market value. It reduces the risk of paying inflated prices that might occur in less competitive scenarios.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely Air Force personnel and their families who will utilize the improved or newly constructed medical facilities. The contract delivers design and construction services for medical facilities, enhancing healthcare infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington state, where the facilities are located. The contract supports the construction workforce, including architects, engineers, project managers, and skilled tradespeople in the relevant geographic area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's execution beyond contract completion.
- Limited information on specific design innovations or cost-saving measures implemented by the contractor.
- The fixed-price nature, while beneficial for cost control, could limit flexibility if unforeseen design challenges arose during construction.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive pricing environment.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- Contract completed within its original timeframe (based on award and end dates), suggesting good project management.
- No immediate red flags regarding contract modifications or disputes in the provided data.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically focusing on institutional and commercial building construction (NAICS 236220). The market for healthcare facility construction is significant, driven by the need for modern, efficient, and specialized medical spaces. This IDIQ likely served as a flexible vehicle for the Air Force to procure multiple design-build projects over its duration, potentially covering various upgrades or new constructions within its medical infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the cost per square foot or per project for similar military or civilian medical construction projects.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications specifically mandated for small businesses through a set-aside program for this particular award. However, the prime contractor, StructSure Projects Inc., may have utilized small businesses as subcontractors as part of their overall business operations or project execution strategy, which is not detailed in this summary data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Army. As a construction contract, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) would likely have been in place to monitor progress, quality, and compliance with specifications. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, which provide basic details of the contract. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction Program (MILCON)
- Defense Health Agency (DHA) Facilities
- General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service
- Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if task orders were not tightly defined.
- Reliance on fixed-price contracts can sometimes lead to contractor pressure to cut corners on quality if not adequately overseen.
- Limited transparency on specific performance metrics and subcontractor utilization.
Tags
construction, medical-facilities, design-build, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, department-of-the-army, air-force, washington, commercial-institutional-building, defense
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.3 million to STRUCTSURE PROJECTS INC. IDIQ FOR AIR FORCE MEDICAL DESIGN-BUILD
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STRUCTSURE PROJECTS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-30. End: 2009-11-11.
What was the specific scope of work for the medical facilities constructed or designed under this IDIQ?
The provided data identifies this as an 'IDIQ FOR AIR FORCE MEDICAL DESIGN-BUILD' contract, indicating its purpose was to procure design and construction services for Air Force medical facilities. However, the specific scope of work for individual task orders issued under this IDIQ is not detailed. This could range from minor renovations and upgrades to existing facilities to the complete design and construction of new medical centers or clinics. The NAICS code 236220 suggests general commercial and institutional building construction, implying a broad capability was sought.
How did StructSure Projects Inc.'s pricing compare to other bidders in the full and open competition?
Detailed pricing information and the number of bids received are not available in the provided summary data. However, the fact that the contract was awarded under 'full and open competition' suggests that multiple bids were solicited and evaluated. The government's selection process would have considered price, technical qualifications, past performance, and other factors. Without access to the bid tabulation or source selection documents, a direct comparison of StructSure Projects Inc.'s pricing against competitors cannot be made. The Firm Fixed Price nature implies the final negotiated price was deemed acceptable by the government.
Were there any significant performance issues or contract modifications during the life of this IDIQ?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded on September 30, 2006, and ended on November 11, 2009, with a duration of 1138 days. There is no explicit mention of significant performance issues, disputes, or extensive modifications in the summary data. This suggests the contract may have proceeded relatively smoothly to completion. However, a comprehensive review would require examining contract modification history and performance reports, which are not included in this dataset.
What is the typical cost range for similar Air Force medical design-build projects?
The average cost for Air Force medical design-build projects can vary significantly based on factors like facility size, complexity, location, and specific medical capabilities required. Projects can range from a few million dollars for smaller clinic upgrades to tens or even hundreds of millions for large hospital constructions. This $17.3 million IDIQ likely encompassed multiple smaller to medium-sized projects or one substantial facility. Benchmarking would require comparing specific project metrics like cost per square foot or cost per bed against similar military healthcare construction contracts.
How does the $17.3 million total award value compare to annual Air Force spending on medical infrastructure?
The $17.3 million awarded to StructSure Projects Inc. represents a specific investment in medical facility design-build services. Annual Air Force spending on medical infrastructure is considerably larger, encompassing a wide array of projects, maintenance, equipment, and operational costs across numerous facilities globally. This single IDIQ award is a component of that larger budget. To contextualize, one would need to compare this amount against the total annual budget allocated by the Air Force for facilities, construction, and healthcare infrastructure modernization.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 8041 WEST 47TH STREET, SUI, OVERLAND PARK, KS, 03
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,330,124
Exercised Options: $17,330,124
Current Obligation: $17,330,124
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9126G04D0011
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-30
Current End Date: 2009-11-11
Potential End Date: 2009-11-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-03-23
More Contracts from Structsure Projects Inc
- THE Defense Health Agency-Facilities Enterprise Requires Design, Construction, Initial Outfitting, and Transition Services for the FY23 FT Bragg Womack Army Medical Center Surgical Suite Expansion and Blood Donor Center Addition-Alteration Project — $107.0M (Department of Defense)
- Medical Center Realignment, 99TH Medical Group, Nellis AIR Force Base, Nevada: Structural and Electrical Repairs; Replace Clean Steam System and AIR Handling Units; Elevator CAB Repairs; Site Improvements; Fire and Life Safety Repairs; Addition to Warehouse; Initial Outfitting; and Building Demolition — $94.0M (Department of Defense)
- Constsvcs-Ambulatory Care Center, PH 4-Jbsa — $79.9M (Department of Defense)
- Dunn Dental Clinic Construction — $75.9M (Department of Defense)
- Construct a NEW LAW Atct AT the Lawton Fort-Sill Regional Airport in Lawton, OK — $63.9M (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)