DoD's $109M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to Intuitive Research and Technology
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,912,798 ($10.9M)
Contractor: Stanley Associates, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-08
End Date: 2010-07-07
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200510!004052!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050708!20051231!034964945!034964945!034964945!N!INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOL!6767 OLD MADISON PIKE NW !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000190364!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !20200930!C! ! !N!Z!A!N!J!1!001! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!A!N!N!Z! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35805
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.9 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: 200510!004052!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050708!20051231!034964945!034964945!034964945!N!INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOL!6767 OLD MADISON PIKE NW !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADI… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $109,127,982.29, is for engineering technical services. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, it falls under the Missile and Space Systems category. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract is 1825 days, indicating a long-term service requirement.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $109M over 5 years suggests a significant investment in specialized engineering services. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts for missile and space systems would be necessary for a precise pricing assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is likely to have resulted in a fair price, maximizing the value of taxpayer funds spent on critical missile and space systems development.
Public Impact
Supports critical missile and space systems development for the U.S. Army. Ensures continued technological advancement in defense capabilities. Provides specialized engineering expertise to a key government agency. The long-term nature of the contract offers stability for the awarded company and its employees.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 100 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical services.
- Need for robust oversight to ensure performance standards are met.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Long contract duration provides stability.
- Focus on critical defense technology.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically for engineering technical services related to missile and space systems. The value of $109M is substantial and reflects the complexity and importance of the work for national defense.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if opportunities were missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the DoD, which has established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of this oversight in ensuring performance and managing costs requires ongoing monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is long (5 years), increasing risk of scope creep or changing requirements.
- Specific performance metrics and deliverables are not detailed, making oversight challenging.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Reliance on a single entity for critical R&D services.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, al, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.9 million to STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC.. 200510!004052!2100!W31P4Q!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W31P4Q05A0030 !A!N! !Y!0006 ! !20050708!20051231!034964945!034964945!034964945!N!INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOL!6767 OLD MADISON PIKE NW !HUNTSVILLE !AL!35806!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000190364!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !000 !* !541710!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STANLEY ASSOCIATES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-08. End: 2010-07-07.
What specific engineering technical services are included in this contract, and how do they align with current Army modernization priorities?
The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' for 'MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS.' While the exact services aren't detailed, they likely encompass design, analysis, testing, and integration support for advanced missile and space technologies. This aligns with Army priorities focused on maintaining a technological edge in strategic defense capabilities and space-based assets.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will performance be measured to ensure value for money?
Key performance indicators are not explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, typical KPIs for such contracts would include adherence to technical specifications, timely delivery of milestones, quality of deliverables, and cost control. The Army's contracting officer and technical monitors would be responsible for tracking these metrics and ensuring the contractor meets the agreed-upon standards throughout the contract's duration.
How does the awarded price of $109M compare to industry benchmarks for similar long-term engineering services contracts in the defense sector?
Without specific details on the scope of work and required expertise, a direct benchmark is challenging. However, the price of approximately $21.8M per year for specialized missile and space systems engineering services appears competitive, especially given the 'full and open competition' award. A detailed cost analysis comparing labor rates, overhead, and profit margins with similar contracts would provide a more definitive assessment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CGI Inc (UEI: 248513116)
Address: 3101 WILSON BLVD STE 700, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q05A0030
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-08
Current End Date: 2010-07-07
Potential End Date: 2010-07-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-08-24
More Contracts from Stanley Associates, Inc.
- ADP Acquisition SUP Svcs — $97.3M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- 200206!000057!2100!AA09 !U.S. Army Industrial Operations !daaa0902c0004 !A!N! !Y! !20011101!20021031!144202843!144202843!144202843!n!stanley Associates Inc !300 N Washington ST STE 40!alexandria !va!22314!01000!510!51!alexandria !alexandria (city) !virginia !+000004806524!n!n!000000000000!d307!automated Info System Design & Integration Svcs !S1 !services !1000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541511!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!b!f!n!a! !d!n!u!1!001!n!1g!c!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $44.7M (Department of Defense)
- LIS Support — $43.7M (Department of Defense)
- Mcnosc Netops Tasks 1-4 — $38.8M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $37.2M (Department of State)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)