Navy awards $13M contract for JACDTF design and construction to Harry Pepper & Associates Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,026,010 ($13.0M)

Contractor: Harry Pepper & Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-12-27

End Date: 2009-04-10

Contract Duration: 835 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF JACDTF

Place of Performance

Location: PANAMA CITY BEACH, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32407

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $13.0 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF JACDTF Key points: 1. Contract value of $13.03M for design and construction services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type indicates a defined scope and cost structure. 4. Performance period spans over 2.5 years, from late 2006 to early 2009. 5. The contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code. 6. Geographic location of performance is Florida.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.03 million for design and construction of the JACDTF appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this nature, though specific benchmarks are unavailable without more detailed project scope. The fixed-price nature suggests the government sought cost certainty. Comparison to similar facilities or projects would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. The duration of over two years also implies a substantial undertaking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The competitive nature is expected to drive better pricing and quality.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive process, which aims to secure the best value for the government by fostering a market-driven price. This approach helps prevent inflated costs that might arise from less competitive or sole-source procurements.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and its personnel who will utilize the JACDTF facility. The contract delivers essential design and construction services for a critical facility. The geographic impact is localized to Florida, where the construction will take place. The project will likely involve a workforce of construction professionals, tradespeople, and support staff in Florida.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during construction, despite fixed-price contract.
Delays in construction schedule could impact facility readiness and operational timelines.
Quality control during construction needs to be rigorously monitored to ensure durability and functionality.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process leading to potentially better value.
Contract duration of over two years allows for thorough design and construction phases.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. The market for government construction projects is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense frequently awarding contracts for new facilities and infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide further context on the scale and cost-effectiveness of this award.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions. Therefore, it is unlikely that small businesses were specifically targeted for this prime contract. However, the prime contractor, Harry Pepper & Associates Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the work, contributing to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Navy contracting command. Quality assurance representatives would likely monitor construction progress and adherence to specifications. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases, though detailed project oversight reports are not publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) projects
Department of Defense construction contracts
Military base infrastructure development
Federal building construction awards

Risk Flags

Construction project delays
Potential for cost overruns
Quality assurance during construction

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $13.0 million to HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF JACDTF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HARRY PEPPER & ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-12-27. End: 2009-04-10.

What is the specific function and purpose of the JACDTF?

The provided data does not specify the exact function or purpose of the JACDTF (Joint Counterdrug Task Force). However, based on the name, it is likely a facility designed to support joint operations related to counter-drug efforts, potentially involving multiple branches of the military or federal agencies. Such facilities often include administrative offices, training areas, intelligence analysis centers, and logistical support spaces necessary for coordinated counter-narcotics missions.

How does the contract value of $13.03 million compare to similar construction projects for military facilities?

Without specific details on the size, complexity, and location of the JACDTF, a direct comparison of the $13.03 million contract value to similar projects is challenging. However, for a facility requiring design and construction services over a period of more than two years, this value appears within a plausible range for military construction. Larger, more complex bases or specialized research facilities would naturally command higher values, while smaller administrative buildings might cost less. A detailed cost-benefit analysis would require comparing square footage, specific construction materials, and required technological integrations against industry benchmarks for military construction.

What were the key performance indicators or milestones for this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific key performance indicators (KPIs) or milestones for this contract. Typically, for design and construction contracts, milestones would include the completion and approval of design documents, adherence to construction schedules, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, and final project completion within the agreed-upon budget and timeframe. The fixed-price nature suggests that meeting these milestones within the defined scope and cost would be critical for contractor performance evaluation.

What is the track record of Harry Pepper & Associates Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Navy?

The provided data does not include information on the track record of Harry Pepper & Associates Inc. with federal contracts. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance on similar projects, their history of on-time and within-budget delivery, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. Information on their contract history with the Department of the Navy and other federal agencies would be available through federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS.

Were there any significant risks identified during the procurement or execution of this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list any significant risks identified for this contract. However, common risks in construction projects of this scale include potential delays due to weather, material shortages, or unforeseen site conditions; cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all contingencies; and quality control issues. The full and open competition suggests that the procurement process aimed to mitigate risks by selecting a qualified contractor through a competitive process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N6246703R0188

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Roberts Immigration LAW Group, LLC (UEI: 017106386)

Address: 215 CENTURY 21 DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32216

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,026,010

Exercised Options: $13,026,010

Current Obligation: $13,026,010

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6246703D0188

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline