DoD's $10.9M IT contract with CSRA Information Systems LLC awarded in 2000, spanning nearly 8 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,925,433 ($10.9M)

Contractor: Csra Information Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2000-04-01

End Date: 2008-04-23

Contract Duration: 2,944 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED

Sector: IT

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.9 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the long duration and scope of IT services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Long contract duration may present risks related to technology obsolescence. 4. Performance context is limited without specific task order details. 5. This contract falls within the broad IT services sector for the Defense Department. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized, indicating a focus on larger prime contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $10.9 million over nearly 8 years averages to approximately $1.4 million annually. Without specific details on the services rendered or comparable contracts from the same period, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, for IT services provided to a major agency like the Department of Defense, this annual spend is not exceptionally high, suggesting a potentially fair, though not necessarily outstanding, price point. Further analysis would require benchmarking against similar IT support contracts from the early 2000s.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically suggests a competitive market where multiple vendors vied for the work. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competition type implies that pricing was likely driven by market forces, potentially leading to more favorable terms for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality services, maximizing the value of government spending.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from sustained IT support services. Essential IT infrastructure and operational support were likely delivered to military personnel. The geographic impact is primarily within the Defense Information Systems Agency's operational areas, likely nationwide or global. The contract supported IT professionals and potentially impacted the broader defense IT workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (nearly 8 years) increases the risk of technology becoming outdated.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor effectiveness.
Limited information on task orders hinders understanding of the specific services provided.
The absence of small business participation might limit opportunities for smaller, innovative firms.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
The contract provided essential IT services to a critical government agency.
A long-term award can indicate a stable and reliable relationship between the agency and contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically IT services and support. The IT services market for the federal government is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being major consumers. During the early 2000s, IT spending was rapidly increasing to modernize systems and enhance cybersecurity. This contract likely supported the Defense Information Systems Agency's (DISA) mission-critical IT infrastructure, a common area for significant federal IT investment.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor is there information indicating subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through subcontracting if initiated by the prime contractor. The absence of specific set-asides means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely minimal.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of Defense, likely through contracting officers and program managers within the Defense Information Systems Agency. Accountability measures would be tied to the terms and conditions of the contract, including performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational oversight specifics are typically internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Defense Information Systems Agency IT Support Services
Department of Defense IT Modernization Programs
Federal Civilian IT Services Contracts
IT Services for National Security Agencies

Risk Flags

Potential for technological obsolescence due to long contract duration.
Limited transparency on specific services and performance metrics.
No explicit small business subcontracting requirements noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.9 million to CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-04-01. End: 2008-04-23.

What was the specific nature of the IT services provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the IT services rendered. However, given the awardee (CSRA Information Systems LLC, a major IT services provider) and the awarding agency (Defense Information Systems Agency - DISA), it is highly probable that the services encompassed a broad range of IT support. This could include network management, system administration, cybersecurity support, software development or maintenance, help desk services, and infrastructure support for DISA's operations. The long duration suggests ongoing, essential IT functions rather than short-term projects.

How does the total contract value of $10.9 million compare to similar IT contracts awarded by DoD around the year 2000?

Comparing the $10.9 million total contract value requires context regarding the specific services and duration. Awarded in 2000 and ending in 2008 (nearly 8 years), the average annual value is approximately $1.4 million. During the early 2000s, the DoD was heavily investing in IT modernization. Contracts for enterprise-level IT support, network infrastructure, or significant software development could range from millions to hundreds of millions of dollars annually. For a contract spanning nearly eight years and likely covering essential IT operations for an agency like DISA, $1.4 million annually appears to be within a reasonable range, suggesting fair market pricing rather than an outlier, though specific benchmarks are needed for definitive assessment.

What are the potential risks associated with a contract awarded in 2000 and ending in 2008, given the rapid pace of technological change?

The primary risk associated with a contract awarded in 2000 and extending through 2008 is technological obsolescence. IT standards, hardware, software, and security protocols evolve rapidly. Services or systems implemented early in the contract's life could be outdated by its end, potentially leading to inefficiencies, security vulnerabilities, or increased maintenance costs. Managing this risk would have required the agency to actively oversee technology refresh cycles, incorporate updated requirements through contract modifications, or ensure the contractor possessed the agility to adapt to emerging technologies throughout the contract's nearly eight-year span.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' designation imply about the contractor selection process and potential value for taxpayers?

The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' designation signifies that the contract was awarded through a process where all responsible sources were allowed to submit bids. This is generally considered the most competitive procurement method. It implies that the Department of Defense sought the best possible offers from the market, fostering price competition and encouraging innovation. For taxpayers, this typically translates to better value, as competitive bidding pressures contractors to offer lower prices and higher quality services to win the contract, thereby maximizing the efficient use of public funds.

What is the significance of the contract being awarded to 'CSRA INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC'?

CSRA Information Systems LLC (now part of General Dynamics IT) was a major federal IT contractor during the period this contract was active. Being awarded a significant contract by the Department of Defense, particularly through full and open competition, indicates that CSRA possessed the capabilities, experience, and competitive pricing to meet the agency's requirements. This award would have been a substantial piece of business for the company, contributing to its revenue and market position within the federal IT services sector, and demonstrating its capacity to handle large-scale government IT needs.

How does the contract's duration of 2944 days (approx. 8 years) impact its overall assessment?

A duration of approximately eight years for an IT services contract is quite long in the rapidly evolving technology landscape. While long-term contracts can offer stability and predictability for both the agency and the contractor, they also increase the risk of technological obsolescence, as mentioned previously. It suggests the services were likely foundational or ongoing operational support rather than project-based work. The extended period also means that the initial pricing and service level agreements might not reflect current market conditions or technological capabilities by the contract's end, necessitating careful management and potential renegotiation or modification.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 15000 CONFERENCE CENTER D, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DCA20099D5011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline