DoD awards $18.3M for Commercial Building Construction to M. A. Mortenson Company under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,304,016 ($18.3M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-05-10
End Date: 2013-08-15
Contract Duration: 828 days
Daily Burn Rate: $22.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT ALL WORK
Place of Performance
Location: TACOMA, PIERCE County, WASHINGTON, 98433
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.3 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: CONSTRUCT ALL WORK Key points: 1. The contract value of $18.3 million falls within the typical range for large-scale construction projects. 2. M. A. Mortenson Company is a well-established firm, indicating a competitive landscape for major construction contracts. 3. The 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' method suggests a robust price discovery process. 4. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a common area for government spending.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $18.3 million appears reasonable for a large commercial construction project of this duration. Benchmarking against similar DoD construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The use of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' indicates that multiple bidders were likely considered, fostering a competitive environment that should drive favorable pricing. The award to M. A. Mortenson Company suggests they offered the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better value for taxpayers by ensuring a wide range of offers and competitive pricing.
Public Impact
This project contributes to the development of essential infrastructure, potentially for military personnel or support services. The award supports jobs within the construction sector and related industries. The successful completion of this building project will enhance the operational capabilities of the Department of the Army.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration of 828 days is substantial, requiring careful monitoring for potential cost overruns or delays.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Government spending in this area is substantial, supporting infrastructure development and military readiness. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was a large contract awarded to a major firm. There is no specific information provided regarding the subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this particular project.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight mechanisms for construction projects, including site inspections and progress reporting, would be in place.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (828 days) increases risk of cost escalation and schedule slippage.
- Lack of specific scope details makes it difficult to fully assess value and potential risks.
- No information on small business participation is provided, which could be a missed opportunity for economic impact.
- Potential for unforeseen site conditions or material cost fluctuations inherent in construction projects.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, wa, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.3 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. CONSTRUCT ALL WORK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-05-10. End: 2013-08-15.
What was the specific scope of work for this commercial building construction project?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work. However, as a commercial and institutional building construction contract, it likely involved the erection of a new facility or significant renovation of an existing one. This could include site preparation, foundation work, structural assembly, interior finishing, and utility installation, tailored to the needs of the Department of the Army.
Were there any significant cost variances or delays reported during the contract period?
The provided data does not include information on cost variances or delays. A thorough review of contract performance reports and post-award documentation would be necessary to determine if the project stayed within budget and schedule. The duration of 828 days suggests a complex project where monitoring is crucial.
How does the final contract value compare to the initial bid estimates from competitors?
The data does not provide initial bid estimates. To assess this, one would need access to the bid tabulation from the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' process. Comparing the awarded value of $18.3 million to the bids submitted by other qualified contractors would reveal the competitiveness of the final price and the effectiveness of the price discovery mechanism.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W9126G07R0110
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc. (UEI: 130731797)
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,304,016
Exercised Options: $18,304,016
Current Obligation: $18,304,016
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 20
Total Subaward Amount: $8,174,412
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W9126G08D0045
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-05-10
Current End Date: 2013-08-15
Potential End Date: 2013-08-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-03
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Clin 0001 Base BID Repair EHW 1 Phase 2 NSB Kings BAY GA — $154.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)