DoD's $87.7M Contract for Engineering Services to CACI Technologies Faces Scrutiny Over Value and Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $87,735,804 ($87.7M)
Contractor: CACI Technologies, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-07-29
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,254 days
Daily Burn Rate: $38.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 21
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200411!044400!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040729!20040930!057364507!094107844!045534641!N!CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC !14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!82000!810!51!VIRGINIA BEACH !VIRGINIA BEACH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000004370791!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20060331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23510
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $87.7 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC for work described as: 200411!044400!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040729!20040930!057364507!094107844!045534641!N!CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC !14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!82000!810!51!VIRGINIA BEACH !VIRG… Key points: 1. The contract awarded to CACI Technologies, Inc. for engineering services is substantial at $87.7 million. 2. Competition details are unclear, with 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' listed, but the award type is 'DELIVERY ORDER', suggesting a potential task order under a broader contract. 3. Potential risks include the 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' pricing structure, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. 4. The sector is 'OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES', specifically engineering services, a critical area for defense operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $87.7 million for engineering services needs further benchmarking against similar DoD contracts. The 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' (CPFF) structure, while common, requires careful oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent potential overruns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract is listed as 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', but the award type is 'DELIVERY ORDER'. This suggests it might be a task order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, which could limit the scope of competition for this specific order.
Taxpayer Impact: The significant value of this contract means taxpayers are funding a substantial amount for engineering services. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient service delivery is crucial for maximizing taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Taxpayers are funding a significant contract for engineering services, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in defense spending. The reliance on 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' contracts necessitates robust oversight to prevent potential cost escalations. The specific engineering services provided are critical to Naval Sea Systems Command operations, impacting national security readiness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure
- Delivery Order under a potentially broader contract
- Lack of specific detail on competition for this delivery order
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a known entity (CACI Technologies)
- Contract duration is substantial, indicating a long-term need for services
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under 'OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES', specifically engineering services (NAICS 541330), a vital component of the defense sector. Spending in this area is benchmarked against the overall DoD budget for technical and engineering support.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'DELIVERY ORDER' nature of this award suggests it may be part of a larger contract vehicle. Oversight should focus on the administration of the parent contract and the specific task order to ensure compliance and value.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure
- Limited visibility into competition for this specific delivery order
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical engineering services
- Need for robust oversight of contract performance and cost reporting
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $87.7 million to CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 200411!044400!1700!BZ005 !NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!0002 ! !20040729!20040930!057364507!094107844!045534641!N!CACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC !14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!82000!810!51!VIRGINIA BEACH !VIRGINIA BEACH (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000004370791!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CACI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $87.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-07-29. End: 2010-09-30.
What was the competitive landscape for the parent contract under which this delivery order was issued?
The provided data indicates 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' for the contract itself, but the award type is a 'DELIVERY ORDER'. This implies the order was placed against a pre-existing contract, likely an IDIQ. Understanding the competition for that parent contract is crucial to assessing the overall fairness of the procurement process.
How effectively was the 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' structure managed to control costs and ensure value for money?
The 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' (CPFF) pricing model carries inherent risks of cost overruns if not rigorously managed. Effective oversight, including detailed cost tracking, performance reviews, and adherence to contract terms, is essential to ensure that the final cost reflects the value delivered and remains within reasonable bounds for the services rendered.
What is the specific impact of these engineering services on the operational effectiveness of the Naval Sea Systems Command?
Engineering services are fundamental to the design, development, maintenance, and modernization of naval systems. The effectiveness of CACI Technologies' services directly influences the readiness, capability, and lifecycle management of critical naval assets, ultimately impacting the Navy's ability to execute its mission.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 21
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: CACI International Inc
Address: 14151 PARK MEADOW DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4026
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-07-29
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-09-02
More Contracts from CACI Technologies, LLC
- Award of Task Order 0127 (S3R-043) PWS Titled, "engineering, Installation/Integration, Technology Insertion and Logistical Support to the Quick Reaction&battle Command Support Division" Funding IS Provided for Engineering, Logistical and Training Seta Support for Centcom, and C2D SPO Personnel on Slin 0008AA — $238.5M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a NEW Five (5) Year Task Order Under the RS3 Contract for Modeling and Simulation, Analysis, Engineering, Networking, and Experimentation Support — $202.0M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Task Order 0092, W15p7t-06-D-E402 Title, "PEO C3T System Engineering Technical Assistance Support. Funding IS Provided for Seta Support on Slin 0001AA $12,000,000.00, on Slin 0001AB $5,500,000.00 and on Slin 0001AC $7,000,000.00 — $196.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200512!052533!1700!n00024!naval SEA Systems Command !N0017804D4026 !A!N! !Y!EH01 ! !20050901!20050930!057364507!094107844!045534641!n!caci Technologies, Inc !14151 Park Meadow Drive !chantilly !va!20151!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000000120139!n!n!000000000000!r408!program Management/Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !a!n!u!2!021!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! !1700!N00178!0001! ! — $184.5M (Department of Defense)
- Naval Forces Logistics Support — $178.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)