PKL SERVICES, INC. awarded $34.1M contract for technical and trade school services by the Air Force

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,101,091 ($34.1M)

Contractor: PKL Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-09-14

End Date: 2017-08-31

Contract Duration: 351 days

Daily Burn Rate: $97.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: POWAY, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92064

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.1 million to PKL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in specialized training. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for similar services. 3. Performance period of 351 days indicates a focused, short-term training requirement. 4. The contract falls within the 'Other Technical and Trade Schools' NAICS code, highlighting a specific training niche. 5. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide budget certainty. 6. Geographic location in California may indicate regional training needs or contractor presence.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $34.1 million for technical and trade school services appears reasonable given the scope of training likely required by the Department of the Air Force. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized technical training would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively, but without detailed service breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and evaluated. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive market rates, thereby maximizing the value of federal dollars spent.

Public Impact

Personnel within the Department of the Air Force are the primary beneficiaries, receiving specialized technical and trade skills. The services delivered likely include vocational training, certification programs, and skill development essential for military operations. The geographic impact is concentrated in California, where the training is presumably conducted. Workforce implications include the upskilling of military personnel and potentially the creation of training-related jobs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training requirements are not clearly defined.
Ensuring the quality and relevance of training to evolving Air Force needs.
Dependency on contractor's ability to deliver specialized instruction effectively.

Positive Signals

Clear contract type (firm fixed price) helps manage budget.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these services.
Contract awarded to PKL SERVICES, INC., a company specializing in educational services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader education and training sector, specifically focusing on technical and vocational skills. The market for such services is driven by the demand for specialized expertise across various industries, including government and defense. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government contracts for similar technical training programs, which can vary significantly based on the complexity and duration of the skills taught.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses is not evident from this award alone. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if similar, smaller contracts are awarded separately.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases, though detailed performance metrics are often internal.

Related Government Programs

Military Training Services
Vocational Education Contracts
Technical Skill Development Programs
Department of Defense Education and Training

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Training Relevance
Contractor Performance History

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.1 million to PKL SERVICES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PKL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-09-14. End: 2017-08-31.

What specific technical and trade skills are being provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact technical and trade skills covered by this contract. However, the NAICS code '611519 - Other Technical and Trade Schools' suggests a broad range of vocational training. This could encompass areas such as advanced manufacturing, electronics, aviation mechanics, cybersecurity, or other specialized fields critical to Air Force operations. A detailed review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would be necessary to ascertain the precise curriculum and skill sets being imparted to personnel.

How does the $34.1 million contract value compare to historical Air Force spending on similar training programs?

Without specific historical data on Air Force spending for comparable technical and trade school services, a direct comparison is difficult. However, $34.1 million represents a substantial investment, suggesting a significant training initiative or a long-term requirement. To benchmark this value, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded for similar vocational training, considering factors like the number of personnel trained, the duration of the programs, and the complexity of the skills taught. The firm fixed-price nature of this contract implies a defined scope and budget, which aids in cost control compared to cost-plus contracts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for training contracts, KPIs would focus on metrics such as student completion rates, pass rates for certifications, post-training performance evaluations, and the relevance of acquired skills to job requirements. The contracting officer and program managers would monitor these KPIs to ensure the contractor is meeting the objectives outlined in the Statement of Work and delivering effective training outcomes for the Air Force personnel.

What is the track record of PKL SERVICES, INC. in delivering government training contracts?

The provided data indicates that PKL SERVICES, INC. was awarded this $34.1 million contract by the Department of the Air Force. To assess their track record, further investigation into their past performance on government contracts, particularly those involving technical and trade school services, would be necessary. This would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or awards, and the overall history of their engagement with federal agencies. Their specialization in educational services, as suggested by the contract's nature, implies some level of expertise in the field.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Potential risks for this contract include the possibility of the training curriculum becoming outdated, the contractor failing to meet performance standards, or cost overruns if the fixed-price scope is not well-defined. Mitigation strategies would involve rigorous oversight by the Air Force, clear performance metrics in the contract, regular reviews of training content, and potentially incorporating clauses for contract modifications if technology or operational needs change significantly. The firm fixed-price structure itself acts as a risk mitigation tool by capping the government's financial exposure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FA300216R0007

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14265 DANIELSONS ST C1, POWAY, CA, 92064

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,101,091

Exercised Options: $34,101,091

Current Obligation: $34,101,091

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA300216D0011

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline