DoD's $62.5M F-15 maintenance contract awarded to PKL Services, Inc. lacked competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $62,520,447 ($62.5M)
Contractor: PKL Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-01-01
End Date: 2016-12-31
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $171.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF F-15 C/D/S ACFT MAINT UGT BRIDGE CONTRACT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $62.5 million to PKL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF F-15 C/D/S ACFT MAINT UGT BRIDGE CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract's value of $62.5 million for F-15 aircraft maintenance represents a significant investment in fleet readiness. 2. Awarded on a sole-source basis, the lack of competition raises questions about potential overpayment and missed opportunities for cost savings. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope, but the absence of competitive bidding limits transparency in pricing. 4. PKL Services, Inc. secured this substantial contract without facing any other bidders, indicating a potential gap in the market or a specific justification for sole-sourcing. 5. The contract duration of one year, with a start date in early 2016, suggests a bridge or specific need rather than a long-term strategic partnership. 6. The NAICS code 611519 points to technical and trade schools, which is an unusual classification for aircraft maintenance services, warranting further investigation into the contractor's specific capabilities and the service categorization.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to the sole-source award and the unusual NAICS code classification. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the $62.5 million represents a fair market price for F-15 maintenance. The lack of comparison data from other potential providers makes it hard to assess if PKL Services, Inc. offered the best value for the government. Further analysis would be needed to compare the services rendered against industry standards and typical pricing for similar aircraft maintenance contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning PKL Services, Inc. was the only vendor considered. The justification for not competing this requirement is not provided in the available data. Sole-source awards can sometimes be necessary due to unique capabilities or urgent needs, but they inherently limit price discovery and can lead to higher costs for the government compared to a competitively bid contract. The absence of multiple bidders means the government did not benefit from the potential for lower prices and innovative solutions that competition typically fosters.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium for this contract due to the lack of competition. Without a competitive process, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the most cost-effective solution, potentially leading to less efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries of this contract are the U.S. Air Force units operating F-15 C/D/S aircraft, ensuring their operational readiness. The services delivered include maintenance and support for F-15 aircraft, crucial for national defense capabilities. The geographic impact is likely concentrated around Air Force bases where F-15s are stationed and maintained. The contract supports a specialized workforce skilled in aircraft maintenance, potentially including technicians and support staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition for a significant contract value may indicate potential for inflated pricing.
- The sole-source award raises concerns about whether the government explored all available options for competitive procurement.
- The unusual NAICS code classification for aircraft maintenance requires further scrutiny to ensure appropriate service delivery and cost alignment.
- Limited transparency in pricing due to the absence of competitive bids.
Positive Signals
- The contract was awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, which helps control costs by establishing a set price for the work.
- The contract aims to ensure the continued operational readiness of critical F-15 aircraft, supporting national security objectives.
- PKL Services, Inc. was selected, suggesting they possess the necessary qualifications, even if not competitively vetted in this instance.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by complex, high-value contracts often involving specialized maintenance and support services. The F-15 is a long-standing fighter jet, and its maintenance requires specific expertise. The market for such specialized aviation services can be limited, but typically, significant contracts like this would be subject to robust competition to ensure value for money. The total addressable market for military aircraft maintenance is substantial, with governments worldwide investing billions annually. This contract fits within the broader category of sustainment services for aging but critical military platforms.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits for small businesses stemming from this particular award. The contract was awarded to PKL Services, Inc., and without further information on their subcontracting plans or the nature of the services, the impact on the broader small business ecosystem is not directly discernible from this data alone.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides some level of cost control. However, the sole-source award limits the transparency typically afforded by competitive bidding. Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would apply for investigations into fraud, waste, or abuse. Accountability measures would rely on contract performance monitoring and adherence to the terms and conditions specified in the award.
Related Government Programs
- F-15 Aircraft Sustainment Programs
- Air Force Logistics and Maintenance Contracts
- Defense Aviation Support Services
- Combat Aircraft Maintenance Contracts
- Military Aircraft Parts and Repair
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive justification.
- Unusual NAICS code classification for aircraft maintenance.
- Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition.
- Limited transparency in pricing and value assessment.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, f-15, aircraft-maintenance, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, pk-services-inc, 611519, bridge-contract, 2016
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $62.5 million to PKL SERVICES, INC.. IGF::CL::IGF F-15 C/D/S ACFT MAINT UGT BRIDGE CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PKL SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $62.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-01-01. End: 2016-12-31.
What specific justification was provided for awarding this F-15 maintenance contract on a sole-source basis?
The provided data indicates the contract was awarded under 'NOT COMPETED' (ct: NOT COMPETED), signifying a sole-source procurement. However, the specific justification for this decision is not detailed in the dataset. Typically, sole-source awards are made when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, such as in cases of urgent and compelling need, unique capabilities, or when a follow-on contract is required for compatibility. Without the official justification document, it is impossible to ascertain the precise reasons the Department of the Air Force did not pursue a competitive bidding process for this $62.5 million contract with PKL Services, Inc.
How does the $62.5 million contract value compare to historical spending on F-15 maintenance by the Air Force?
Comparing this $62.5 million contract to historical spending on F-15 maintenance requires access to broader historical contract data for the F-15 program. This single contract represents a significant sum for a one-year period (2016). However, without knowing the total annual maintenance budget for the F-15 fleet or the value of previous individual maintenance contracts, it's difficult to establish a precise historical context. The Air Force operates a large fleet of F-15s, and sustainment costs can be substantial over the aircraft's lifecycle. This contract likely represents a portion of the overall annual sustainment expenditure, but its relative size compared to past spending would need a more comprehensive analysis of historical procurement records.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large maintenance contract without competition?
The primary risk associated with awarding a large contract like this $62.5 million F-15 maintenance agreement without competition is the potential for paying a higher price than necessary. Competitive bidding typically drives down costs as contractors vie for the award. Without this pressure, the sole-source provider may not be incentivized to offer the most cost-effective solution. Other risks include a lack of innovation, as there's no competitive drive to offer new or improved methods, and potential complacency from the contractor regarding performance quality. Furthermore, it raises concerns about whether the government adequately explored all avenues for competition, potentially missing out on better value or specialized capabilities from other firms.
What is the significance of the NAICS code 611519 ('Other Technical and Trade Schools') for an aircraft maintenance contract?
The classification of this contract under NAICS code 611519, 'Other Technical and Trade Schools,' is highly unusual for a direct aircraft maintenance service contract. This code typically applies to institutions providing vocational or technical training. Its use here suggests that PKL Services, Inc. may be providing training services related to F-15 maintenance, or that the contract scope includes a significant training component alongside or instead of direct hands-on maintenance. Alternatively, it could indicate a misclassification or a unique contractual arrangement where the contractor is responsible for developing and delivering maintenance training programs. This discrepancy warrants further investigation to understand the precise nature of the services rendered and the rationale behind the NAICS code selection.
What performance metrics or oversight mechanisms were likely in place for this contract?
Given the firm-fixed-price nature of the contract and its focus on aircraft maintenance, performance metrics would likely revolve around meeting scheduled maintenance, turnaround times, quality of repairs, and adherence to technical specifications and safety standards. Oversight would typically involve government quality assurance representatives (QARs) stationed at the contractor's facility or monitoring performance remotely. Contract specialists and program managers within the Air Force would track progress, manage payments, and ensure compliance with contract terms. While the data doesn't specify the exact metrics, standard practices in defense contracting would necessitate robust monitoring to ensure the operational readiness of the F-15 fleet was maintained effectively.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools
Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: FA300215R0018
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14265 DANIELSONS ST C1, POWAY, CA, 92064
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $62,520,447
Exercised Options: $62,520,447
Current Obligation: $62,520,447
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-01-01
Current End Date: 2016-12-31
Potential End Date: 2016-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-04-03
More Contracts from PKL Services, Inc.
- Reset Services — $168.5M (Department of Defense)
- Republic of Singapore AIR Force F-15 Flight Operations and Maintenance Support Training — $89.2M (Department of Defense)
- Aircraft Maintenance and Operations Training Services — $62.5M (Department of Defense)
- Aircraft Maintenance&operation Services, Mountain Home AFB, ID — $59.3M (Department of Defense)
- F-15 Upgrade Training — $46.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)