DoD's $36M Fort Benning Construction Contract Awarded to M. A. Mortenson Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $36,169,377 ($36.2M)
Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-04
End Date: 2011-04-29
Contract Duration: 602 days
Daily Burn Rate: $60.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: VMF & SHOP 1, FORT BENNING, GA
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BENNING, CHATTAHOOCHEE County, GEORGIA, 31905
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $36.2 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: VMF & SHOP 1, FORT BENNING, GA Key points: 1. The contract value of $36.2M falls within the typical range for large-scale construction projects. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The project duration of 602 days is substantial, indicating a complex undertaking. 4. The award to M. A. Mortenson Company, a large business, means no direct small business set-aside was applied.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $36.2M for commercial and institutional building construction is substantial. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would be necessary to fully assess value, but the fixed-price nature aims to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. The existence of 5 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and potential for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple bids, potentially leading to lower prices and better value.
Public Impact
Construction of facilities at Fort Benning, Georgia, impacting military readiness and personnel. Potential for job creation in the construction sector within Georgia. The project's success contributes to the Department of the Army's infrastructure development goals.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of small business participation noted.
- Project duration is significant, increasing potential for cost overruns or delays.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm fixed price contract type helps control costs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector is often driven by government infrastructure needs, military base development, and public facility upgrades. Benchmarks vary widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that the contract was not awarded to a small business, nor was it a small business set-aside. This suggests that larger firms were deemed the most capable or competitive for this specific project.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Army, under the Department of Defense, is responsible for oversight. The firm fixed price contract type provides a degree of cost control, but monitoring progress and quality throughout the 602-day duration is crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- No small business participation.
- Long project duration (602 days).
- Potential for cost escalation on fixed-price contracts if not managed tightly.
- Specific project risks (e.g., site conditions) not detailed.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ga, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $36.2 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. VMF & SHOP 1, FORT BENNING, GA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $36.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-04. End: 2011-04-29.
What was the average bid price from the other four bidders, and how did M. A. Mortenson Company's bid compare?
The provided data does not include the bid prices of the other four bidders. To assess the value effectively, comparing M. A. Mortenson Company's winning bid against the range of other submitted bids would be essential. This comparison would reveal the competitiveness of the final price and whether the government secured a favorable deal.
What specific risks were identified during the bidding process or are inherent in a 602-day construction project of this magnitude?
Risks could include unforeseen site conditions, material cost fluctuations over the extended duration, labor availability issues, and potential design changes. The firm fixed price contract shifts some of this risk to the contractor, but the government must still manage scope and ensure timely completion to avoid extended operational impacts.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was achieved for this significant infrastructure investment?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and competitive pricing. With five bids received, the process likely facilitated price discovery. However, a thorough evaluation of technical capabilities alongside price would be needed to confirm that the 'best value' was indeed secured, not just the lowest price.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912HN07R0101
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc. (UEI: 130731797)
Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $36,169,377
Exercised Options: $36,169,377
Current Obligation: $36,169,377
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912HN09D0030
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-04
Current End Date: 2011-04-29
Potential End Date: 2011-04-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-02-22
More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company
- TAS::47 4543::TAS Modernization of the Byron G. Rogers Federal Office Building and the Byron G. Rogers Federal Courthouse Window Replacement in Denver, CO — $160.4M (General Services Administration)
- Construction Contract 2 for the Dept. of State, Foreign Affairs Security Training Center (fastc) in Blackstone, VA. Includes an Indoor Firing Range, Indoor/Outdoor Tactical Range, Tactical Training Building, Office and Classroom Building, Driving Tracks, Mock Urban Driving Track and Mock Embassy — $154.6M (General Services Administration)
- Clin 0001 Base BID Repair EHW 1 Phase 2 NSB Kings BAY GA — $154.6M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Build-Bridging Construction Services for the Modernization of the U.S. National Poultry Research Center (usnprc), Seprl Campus in Athens, GA This IS a Two-Phase Design-Build Acquisition. ONE Solicitation Covers Both Phases. Phase I IS the Pre-Selection Phase in Which the Government Will "shortlist" Maximum of (4) of the Most Highly Qualified Offerors. Only Those Firms Selected in Phase I Will BE Allowed to Continue to the Phase II. Detailed Design Criteria Will Then BE Added by Amendment to the Solicitation to Start the Phase II Stage of the Request for Proposals. Each Firm Selected for Participation in Phase II Will Then Submit a Design-Build Technical Proposal, the Remainder of the Performance Capability Proposal and Price Proposal. Igf::ot::igf — $149.6M (Department of Agriculture)
- Ibct — $141.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)