DoD Awards $34.8M Industrial Building Construction Contract to M. A. Mortenson Company

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,859,440 ($34.9M)

Contractor: M. a. Mortenson Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-05-17

End Date: 2008-10-14

Contract Duration: 516 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION AWARD/BCT(H)TEMF/ORG

Place of Performance

Location: COLORADO SPRINGS, EL PASO County, COLORADO, 80913

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.9 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY for work described as: CONSTRUCTION AWARD/BCT(H)TEMF/ORG Key points: 1. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value is $34.8 million for industrial building construction. 3. The contractor, M. A. Mortenson Company, is a significant player in the construction sector. 4. The contract duration is 516 days, suggesting a substantial project timeline.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award amount of $34.8 million appears reasonable for a large-scale industrial building construction project. Benchmarking against similar DoD construction contracts would provide a more precise assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The presence of 3 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving a fair price for the construction services rendered.

Public Impact

Enhances military infrastructure capabilities for the Department of Defense. Supports regional economic activity through construction jobs and material procurement. The project's completion will contribute to the operational readiness of the Army.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Industrial building construction is a critical sector for defense infrastructure. Spending benchmarks vary widely based on project scope, location, and complexity. This $34.8 million award falls within the typical range for significant facility construction.

Small Business Impact

While this specific award went to a large contractor, the construction sector often involves significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in specialized trades and material supply.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army's procurement process, including competitive bidding and contract oversight, is designed to ensure accountability and efficient use of funds. Monitoring project milestones and adherence to specifications are key oversight functions.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

industrial-building-construction, department-of-defense, co, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.9 million to M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY. CONSTRUCTION AWARD/BCT(H)TEMF/ORG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-17. End: 2008-10-14.

What specific industrial capabilities will this building support for the Department of the Army?

The provided data does not specify the exact industrial capabilities the building will support. Further details from the contract statement of work or project documentation would be needed to ascertain its specific purpose, such as manufacturing, maintenance, storage, or research and development facilities critical to Army operations.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this construction contract to ensure successful project delivery?

Key performance indicators would likely include adherence to the project schedule (516 days), quality of construction meeting specified standards, safety compliance on-site, and staying within the firm fixed price budget. Regular progress reports and site inspections by the contracting officer's representative would monitor these KPIs.

How does the $34.8 million cost compare to similar industrial building construction projects within the Department of Defense?

Without specific benchmarks for comparable DoD industrial buildings (considering size, complexity, and location), a direct comparison is difficult. However, $34.8 million suggests a substantial project. A detailed cost-benefit analysis and comparison with industry cost data would be necessary for a definitive assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionIndustrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W9128F07R0006

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: M. a. Mortenson Companies, Inc. (UEI: 130731797)

Address: 700 MEADOW LN N, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,859,440

Exercised Options: $34,859,440

Current Obligation: $34,859,440

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9128F07D0010

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-05-17

Current End Date: 2008-10-14

Potential End Date: 2008-10-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-02-19

More Contracts from M. a. Mortenson Company

View all M. a. Mortenson Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending