Department of Defense awards $13.4M contract for facilities operations support services to DEL-JEN, INC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,447,428 ($13.4M)
Contractor: Del-Jen, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-01-31
End Date: 2004-01-31
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $36.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200304!000048!5700!GV02 !ESC/PKO !F1965002D0010 !A!N! !Y!0001 !20030131!20040131!039703053!059220392!006907190!N!DEL-JEN, INC !28441 HIGHRIDGE RD STE 40!ROLLING HILLS !CA!90274!28425!017!25!HANSCOM AFB !MIDDLESEX !MASS !+000000517735!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!A!S! ! !D!20040131!B! ! !A! !A!N!R!2!003!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!C!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: HANSCOM AFB, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01731
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.4 million to DEL-JEN, INC. for work described as: 200304!000048!5700!GV02 !ESC/PKO !F1965002D0010 !A!N! !Y!0001 !20030131!20040131!039703053!059220392!006907190!N!DEL-JEN, INC !28441 HIGHRIDGE RD STE 40!ROLLING HILLS !CA!90274!28425!017!25!HANSCOM AFB !MIDDL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities operations support services, indicating a need for maintenance and operational upkeep. 2. The contract value of $13.4M suggests a significant scope of work over its duration. 3. Awarded to DEL-JEN, INC., a contractor with a track record in government services. 4. The contract duration of 365 days points to a short-term or specific project-based need. 5. The primary service category is 'Services', with a specific NAICS code of 541330 (Engineering Services). 6. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending in facilities management and support.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.4M for a one-year period for facilities operations support services appears to be within a reasonable range for such services, especially considering the potential complexity of military base operations. Benchmarking against similar contracts would require more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. However, the absence of specific performance data makes a definitive value assessment challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this contract. This competitive process is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through a wider pool of potential offerors, leading to better value for money.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Air Force and its personnel at Hanscom AFB, who will receive essential facilities operations support. Services delivered include general facilities operations and maintenance, ensuring the functionality and safety of the base. The geographic impact is localized to Hanscom AFB in Massachusetts. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and engineering services sector, potentially benefiting the local workforce in Massachusetts.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's effectiveness beyond contract completion.
- The 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF) contract type can sometimes lead to higher costs if award criteria are not tightly managed.
- Limited information on specific deliverables and outcomes makes it hard to gauge the full impact of the services provided.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- The contractor, DEL-JEN, INC., has secured government contracts, indicating some level of established capability.
- The contract is for essential facilities operations, which are critical for military base functionality.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which encompasses a wide range of professional services related to the design, development, and management of infrastructure and systems. Federal spending in this area is substantial, supporting military readiness, government operations, and public infrastructure projects. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific scope of facilities operations, but large military bases often require multi-million dollar contracts for comprehensive support services.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to DEL-JEN, INC., a company that may or may not be a small business itself. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are usually tied to the 'Cost Plus Award Fee' structure, where performance against defined criteria influences the fee. Transparency is generally provided through contract award databases, but detailed operational oversight information is often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Base Operations Support Services
- Engineering and Technical Services
- Department of Defense Construction and Facilities Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful oversight to manage costs.
- Limited public data on specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
- Contract duration of one year may indicate a need for ongoing re-competition or potential instability for contractor workforce.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, hanscom-afb, massachusetts, facilities-operations-support, engineering-services, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, services, contract-award, >$10m
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.4 million to DEL-JEN, INC.. 200304!000048!5700!GV02 !ESC/PKO !F1965002D0010 !A!N! !Y!0001 !20030131!20040131!039703053!059220392!006907190!N!DEL-JEN, INC !28441 HIGHRIDGE RD STE 40!ROLLING HILLS !CA!90274!28425!017!25!HANSCOM AFB !MIDDLESEX !MASS !+000000517735!N!N!000000000000!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541330!E! !5!A!S! ! !D!20040131!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEL-JEN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-01-31. End: 2004-01-31.
What is the track record of DEL-JEN, INC. with federal contracts, particularly in facilities operations?
DEL-JEN, INC. has a history of receiving federal contracts, primarily within the Department of Defense. While this specific contract is for facilities operations support, their broader portfolio may include other service-oriented contracts. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any reported issues or successes, would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities and reliability in executing government requirements. Information from contract databases and performance reports (if publicly available) would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment of their track record.
How does the $13.4M value compare to similar facilities operations support contracts at other Air Force bases?
The $13.4M value for a one-year facilities operations support contract at Hanscom AFB is substantial. To benchmark this, one would need to compare it with contracts of similar scope and duration at other Air Force installations of comparable size and complexity. Factors such as geographic location, specific service requirements (e.g., HVAC, groundskeeping, janitorial, minor repairs), and the level of security or specialized infrastructure present at the base can significantly influence pricing. Without detailed comparative data on service scope and base characteristics, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high or low value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to assess DEL-JEN, INC.'s performance under this Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract?
Under a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, performance is typically evaluated against a set of pre-defined criteria and metrics outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS). These KPIs could include response times for service requests, quality of maintenance performed, adherence to safety standards, energy efficiency targets, and overall customer satisfaction. The 'award fee' portion is determined by the government's assessment of the contractor's performance against these KPIs, incentivizing high-quality service delivery. Specific KPIs for this contract are not detailed in the provided data but would be critical for understanding how value is measured.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities operations support services at Hanscom AFB or within the Air Force?
Analyzing historical spending trends for facilities operations support at Hanscom AFB and across the Air Force would provide context for the $13.4M award. This would involve examining contract awards over several fiscal years for similar services. A rising trend might indicate increasing needs or inflation, while a stable or decreasing trend could suggest efficiency gains or shifts in operational focus. Understanding these patterns helps in evaluating whether current spending is consistent with past investments or represents a significant change in resource allocation for base support.
What are the potential risks associated with a 'Cost Plus Award Fee' contract for facilities operations?
The primary risk with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract is the potential for costs to escalate beyond initial estimates, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus an award fee based on performance. If the performance criteria are not clearly defined or are too easily met, the contractor may receive a significant award fee even if costs are higher than anticipated. For facilities operations, risks include potential over-servicing, inefficient resource allocation, or a lack of strong cost control incentives if the award fee structure is not meticulously managed and monitored by the government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Fluor Corporation (UEI: 006907190)
Address: 28441 HIGHRIDGE RD STE 40, ROLLING HILLS, CA, 36
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: F1965002D0010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-01-31
Current End Date: 2004-01-31
Potential End Date: 2004-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-05-05
More Contracts from Del-Jen, Inc.
- 200206!000137!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0010 !A!N! !Y! !20020304!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!n!trend Western Technical Corp !4128 W Commonwealth AVE !fullerton !ca!92833!41704!465!48!laughlin AFB !VAL Verde !texas !+000006310405!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!013!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !Z! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $128.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200203!000084!5700!JA02 !aetc Cons/Cc !F4168902C0001 !A!N! !Y! !20011218!20020930!059220632!059220632!059220632!n!trend Western Technical Corp !4128 W Commonwealth AVE !fullerton !ca!92833!72875!005!12!tyndall AFB !BAY !florida !+000003253058!n!n!000000000000!r799!other Management Support Services !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $73.6M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of Albuquerque JC Center — $55.8M (Department of Labor)
- Kittrell JOB Corps Center — $54.9M (Department of Labor)
- Operate the Mississippi JCC — $50.5M (Department of Labor)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)