EPA awards $16.7M for Environmental Consulting Services to MARASCO NEWTON GROUP LTD
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,755,528 ($16.8M)
Contractor: Marasco Newton Group Ltd, the
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2001-08-15
End Date: 2006-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,964 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $16.8 million to MARASCO NEWTON GROUP LTD, THE for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single entity, MARASCO NEWTON GROUP LTD. 2. The contract spans nearly 5 years, indicating a long-term need. 3. The award type is 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION', suggesting a competitive process. 4. The sector appears to be professional services, specifically environmental consulting.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing. However, the specific pricing structure (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) requires careful monitoring.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental consulting services. The effectiveness of the competition and contract management will determine the ultimate value for taxpayers.
Public Impact
Environmental protection initiatives are supported by these consulting services. The long duration suggests ongoing environmental monitoring or remediation efforts. Public health and ecological well-being could be indirectly impacted by the services rendered.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize higher costs.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown for per-unit analysis.
- Potential for scope creep in consulting services over a long duration.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Long contract duration indicates a sustained need for services.
- Services support critical environmental protection goals.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically environmental consulting. Benchmarks for similar long-term environmental consulting contracts can vary widely based on scope and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award, as the 'sb' field is false.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would be crucial for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract to ensure costs remain reasonable and the scope of work is adhered to. The agency's contract management practices are key to accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Long contract duration (1964 days).
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown for analysis.
- Potential for contractor to maximize costs due to fee structure.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, environmental-protection-agency, va, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $16.8 million to MARASCO NEWTON GROUP LTD, THE. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MARASCO NEWTON GROUP LTD, THE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-08-15. End: 2006-12-31.
What specific environmental services were rendered under this contract, and how did they contribute to the EPA's mission?
The contract was for Environmental Consulting Services. These services likely supported the EPA's mission by providing expertise in areas such as environmental impact assessments, regulatory compliance, policy development, or scientific research. Without specific task orders, the precise nature of the services and their direct contribution remains general.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure competitive pricing for a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract?
While 'full and open competition' is designed to foster competitive pricing, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure inherently shifts some risk to the government. Effective price discovery would depend on the clarity of the initial cost estimates, the rigor of the evaluation process, and the agency's ability to negotiate fair fee percentages and monitor costs throughout the contract's life.
What mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost overruns and scope creep in this long-term, cost-reimbursable contract?
Effective management of a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract requires robust oversight. Mechanisms would typically include detailed cost tracking, regular performance reviews, strict change order control processes, and clear performance metrics. The EPA would need a dedicated team to monitor expenditures and ensure the contractor remained within the agreed-upon scope and budget parameters.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: SRA International, Inc. (UEI: 606261683)
Address: 2801 CLARENDON BLVD, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,207,938
Exercised Options: $11,308,229
Current Obligation: $16,755,528
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-08-15
Current End Date: 2006-12-31
Potential End Date: 2006-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-03-13
More Contracts from Marasco Newton Group Ltd, the
- Federal Contract — $16.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- Federal Contract — $10.2M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)