EPA awards $15.6M contract to DynCorp for engineering services under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,611,006 ($15.6M)
Contractor: Dyncorp Info & Engineering
Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Start Date: 2000-01-15
End Date: 2002-12-14
Contract Duration: 1,064 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20460
Plain-Language Summary
Environmental Protection Agency obligated $15.6 million to DYNCORP INFO & ENGINEERING for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to DynCorp for $15.6 million. 2. Procurement method was full and open competition. 3. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee. 4. Duration of the contract was 1064 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more detailed service descriptions.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Full and open competition was utilized, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure may not always yield the lowest price.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for engineering services, with the final cost influenced by the contract type and competitive process.
Public Impact
Environmental protection services were procured. The contract supported agency operations. DynCorp, a significant government contractor, received the award.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can incentivize higher costs.
- Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics.
- Contract duration is relatively long.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was employed.
- Contract awarded to a known entity.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically engineering and technical support for environmental agencies. Benchmarks for similar EPA contracts vary widely based on scope.
Small Business Impact
No indication of small business participation or subcontracting was provided in the data.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve monitoring contractor performance, costs, and adherence to contract terms by the EPA contracting officer and technical monitors.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
- Environmental Protection Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Long contract duration without clear milestones.
- Limited insight into specific services rendered.
Tags
environmental-protection-agency, dc, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Environmental Protection Agency awarded $15.6 million to DYNCORP INFO & ENGINEERING. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DYNCORP INFO & ENGINEERING.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-01-15. End: 2002-12-14.
What was the specific scope of engineering services provided under this contract?
The provided data lacks specific details on the scope of engineering services. Typically, such contracts could involve design, analysis, environmental assessments, or technical consulting related to EPA's mission. Further details would be needed to assess the value and effectiveness of the services rendered.
How did the fixed fee component of the CPFF contract impact DynCorp's incentive to control costs?
In a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. While the fixed fee provides some incentive for efficiency, the primary risk of cost overruns lies with the government, potentially reducing the contractor's urgency to minimize expenses compared to fixed-price contracts.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?
The available data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Effective oversight would require defined metrics related to service quality, timeliness, and adherence to technical requirements to ensure the EPA received adequate value for the $15.6 million expenditure.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 2000 EDMUND HALLEY DR, RESTON
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-01-15
Current End Date: 2002-12-14
Potential End Date: 2002-12-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-06-28
Other Environmental Protection Agency Contracts
- Remedial Action Contract 2 — $383.3M (CH2M Hill, Inc)
- A&E Services — $309.2M (Sultrac, JV)
- Federal Contract — $181.4M (Weston Solutions Inc)
- Central Data Exchange (CDX) Support Services — $160.9M (CGI Federal Inc.)
- This Remedial Action Contract 2 Full Service (RAC 2 FS) for Epa's Region 8 Provides Professional Architect/Engineer, Technical, and Management Services to Support Remedial Response, Enforcement Oversight and Non-Time Critical Removal Activities Under Cercla, AS Amended by Sara; and the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance ACT Pursuant to the Federal Response Plan (FRP) and Other Laws to Help Address And/Or Mitigate Endangerment to the Public Health, Welfare or Environment, and to Support States and Communities in Preparing for Responses to Releases of Hazardous Substances, AS Well AS Counter-Terrorism — $145.9M (CDM Federal Programs Corporation)