EPA awards $236.5M contract to Tetra Tech for environmental services in Pennsylvania

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $23,650,770 ($23.7M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2000-09-15

End Date: 2006-09-29

Contract Duration: 2,205 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19103

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $23.7 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Tetra Tech, Inc. for environmental services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this contract. 3. The contract duration is 2205 days. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee. 5. This contract falls under the 'Other' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is $236.5 million over approximately 6 years. Without specific benchmarks for similar environmental service contracts, assessing the value is challenging. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure allows for performance-based incentives.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method aims to ensure the government receives competitive pricing by allowing all eligible vendors to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes competitive bidding, potentially leading to lower costs and better value for public funds.

Public Impact

Environmental protection services impacting public health and natural resources. Potential for long-term environmental remediation and management projects. Economic impact through job creation and support for the environmental services industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed carefully.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess award fee effectiveness.
The contract duration is substantial, requiring ongoing oversight.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process.
Award fee structure incentivizes contractor performance.
Contract supports critical environmental protection efforts.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other' sector, likely encompassing a broad range of environmental consulting and remediation services. Benchmarking spending in this diverse sector is difficult without more specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not directly awarded this contract, as it was awarded to Tetra Tech, Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for oversight. The Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful monitoring of performance and costs to ensure accountability and value for taxpayer money.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts.
Difficulty in benchmarking 'Other' sector services.
Lack of transparency on small business subcontracting.
Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $23.7 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $23.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-09-15. End: 2006-09-29.

What specific environmental services are covered under this contract, and how do they align with EPA's strategic goals?

The contract likely covers a range of environmental services such as site assessment, remediation, consulting, and technical support. These services would align with the EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment. Specific details would clarify the direct impact on achieving agency objectives and regulatory compliance.

How effectively were costs controlled and performance incentivized under the Cost Plus Award Fee structure?

The effectiveness of cost control and performance incentives hinges on the clarity and measurability of the award fee criteria. Without detailed performance reports and fee allocations, it's difficult to definitively assess. Regular oversight by the EPA would be crucial to ensure contractor performance met or exceeded expectations within budgetary constraints.

What is the long-term environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of the services provided under this contract?

The long-term impact depends on the nature of the environmental issues addressed and the success of the remediation or management strategies employed. Cost-effectiveness would be evaluated by comparing the achieved environmental improvements against the total contract expenditure. Ongoing monitoring and post-contract evaluations are necessary to fully ascertain this.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Contractor Details

Address: 234 MALL BOULEVARD STE 260, KING OF PRUSSIA, PA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Timeline