Department of the Army awarded $24.2M contract for environmental consulting services to Calibre Systems Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,224,638 ($24.2M)
Contractor: Calibre Systems Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-01-01
End Date: 2017-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL::IGF BRAC ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATORS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20310
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.2 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for work described as: IGF::CL::IGF BRAC ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATORS Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is a definitive contract, indicating a long-term agreement for services. 3. Services provided fall under 'Other Management Consulting Services', a broad category. 4. The contract duration was 1825 days, spanning five years. 5. The contract was awarded to a single contractor, Calibre Systems Inc. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses. 7. The contract was firm fixed price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value for this specific contract is challenging without more granular data on the scope of environmental consulting services. However, the total award amount of $24.2 million over five years averages to approximately $4.84 million per year. This figure needs to be compared against the typical annual spending for similar environmental consulting services within the Department of the Army or other federal agencies to assess if it represents good value. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the scope is well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While two bidders is better than one, a higher number of bids typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government. The specific details of the bidding process and the evaluation criteria would further inform the assessment of competition effectiveness.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple companies to compete, which can drive down costs and improve the quality of services offered.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from specialized environmental consulting services to manage its installations and operations. Services likely include environmental assessments, compliance monitoring, remediation planning, and regulatory support. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the contractor is based, but services could extend to Army facilities nationwide. The contract supports a firm providing management consulting services, potentially impacting its workforce and the broader consulting sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the services provided.
- The 'Other Management Consulting Services' NAICS code is very broad, making it hard to pinpoint the exact nature and value of the work.
- Limited competition (2 bidders) may have resulted in a higher price than if more firms had participated.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a fair process.
- Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Contract duration of five years provides stability for service delivery.
Sector Analysis
The federal spending on management and consulting services is substantial, with a significant portion allocated to specialized areas like environmental consulting. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost of environmental consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Defense and other federal agencies for similar scopes of work. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in environmental compliance, remediation, and planning.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. This means that the primary award went to a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are not explicitly detailed. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting plans would be necessary to understand the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract structure, requiring the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Environmental Planning and Consulting
- Defense Environmental Programs
- Management and Consulting Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep in long-term fixed-price contracts.
- Broad NAICS code limits specificity of services provided.
- Limited competition (2 bidders) may impact price discovery.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, environmental-consulting, management-consulting, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, district-of-columbia, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, brac
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.2 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. IGF::CL::IGF BRAC ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATORS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-01-01. End: 2017-12-31.
What specific environmental services did Calibre Systems Inc. provide under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 541618, 'Other Management Consulting Services.' While this suggests a broad range of consulting activities, the specific environmental services rendered under this definitive contract are not detailed. Typically, such contracts for the Department of the Army could encompass environmental compliance support, regulatory affairs management, environmental impact assessments, hazardous waste management consulting, site remediation planning, and natural resource management advice. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW), a precise breakdown of services is not possible. However, the 'BRAC ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATORS' designation in the data suggests a focus on environmental activities related to the Base Realignment and Closure process, which often involves complex cleanup and compliance efforts.
How does the $24.2 million award compare to similar environmental consulting contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?
Comparing the $24.2 million award requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific services. Over its five-year term (2013-2017), this contract represented an average annual expenditure of approximately $4.84 million. To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze other definitive contracts for environmental consulting services awarded by the Army or DoD during a similar period, focusing on contracts with comparable statements of work and complexity. Larger, multi-year environmental remediation or large-scale compliance programs could easily exceed this amount annually. Conversely, smaller, more focused consulting engagements would be significantly less. Without detailed comparisons of service scope and deliverables, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high or low value, but it appears to be a substantial contract for ongoing environmental coordination.
What is the track record of Calibre Systems Inc. in performing federal environmental consulting contracts?
Calibre Systems Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, including those with the Department of Defense. Information from contract databases like FPDS would reveal their past performance on similar environmental consulting or management support contracts. A review of their contract history would show the number of contracts awarded, their total value, performance ratings (if available), and any past performance issues or successes. For this specific contract, the data shows it was awarded and completed, implying a level of successful performance. However, a deeper dive into client feedback, award histories, and any disputes or terminations would provide a more comprehensive picture of their track record in this domain.
What are the potential risks associated with a five-year firm fixed-price contract for environmental consulting?
A significant risk with a five-year firm fixed-price contract for environmental consulting is the potential for scope creep if the initial statement of work is not precisely defined. If unforeseen environmental issues arise or regulatory requirements change significantly during the contract period, the fixed price may not adequately cover the increased effort, potentially leading to disputes or the need for contract modifications. Conversely, if the scope is overestimated or environmental conditions are less complex than anticipated, the contractor could realize higher profit margins. Another risk is that the fixed price might disincentivize the contractor from finding the most cost-effective solutions if they are not contractually obligated to do so, although quality and regulatory compliance remain paramount. The government's ability to effectively manage and oversee the contract is crucial to mitigating these risks.
How has federal spending on 'Other Management Consulting Services' evolved over the period this contract was active (2013-2017)?
Federal spending on 'Other Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541618) generally saw fluctuations during the 2013-2017 period, influenced by budget cycles, agency priorities, and economic conditions. Following sequestration in the early part of this period, federal contracting, including consulting services, faced some constraints. However, as agencies continued to require support for program management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency, spending in this category remained significant. The Department of Defense is consistently one of the largest purchasers of management and consulting services. While specific year-over-year trends for this NAICS code would require detailed analysis of federal procurement data, it's reasonable to assume continued substantial investment by agencies like the Army in management consulting to support their complex missions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W91WAW12R0044
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6354 WALKER LN STE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $24,224,638
Exercised Options: $24,224,638
Current Obligation: $24,224,638
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 3
Total Subaward Amount: $244,992
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-01-01
Current End Date: 2017-12-31
Potential End Date: 2017-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-02-04
More Contracts from Calibre Systems Inc
- THE Vdpo Requires Support Services to Assist in Total Program Development, Design, Implementation, Sustainment, and Analysis to Include, Program Management; Strategic Planning (E.G., Policy Planning and Analysis, and Assessment of Capital Asset and Facility Planning/Utilization); Research and Analysis (E.G., Modeling and Simulation); Planning, Programming and Budgeting Execution (ppbe) Processes; Organizational Analysis and Design; Change Management, Strategic Communications, Program Operations and Deployment, and Veterans Disability Claims Development. This Support Includes Program Implementation World-Wide in Support of Over 300,000 Transitioning Service Members Across More Than 251 Installations Within the Continental United States (conus) and Outside the Contiguous United States (oconus) Annually. IT IS Estimated This Will Include 9,200 Conus TAP Classes, 800 Oconus Taps Classes and Assisting With the Development or Intake of 210,000 Disability Claims Annually. Admin MOD to ADD FAR Clause 52.232-99 — $147.6M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Transition Assistance Program (TAP) — $145.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- NTC Range Sustainment Services, TOP 004 — $69.5M (Department of Defense)
- Dasa-Ce Osmis Support Services FY2021-2026 — $56.7M (Department of Defense)
- Saint-Louis:electronic DOC Records "igf::ct::igf" — $47.0M (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)