Calibre Systems Inc. received $18.45M for management consulting, awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,452,453 ($18.5M)

Contractor: Calibre Systems Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-08-15

End Date: 2014-02-14

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPPORT TO THE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE TAS::21 2020::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22310

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.5 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for work described as: SUPPORT TO THE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE TAS::21 2020::TAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for management consulting services to support the Technology Directorate. 2. The contract was competed openly, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. A definitive contract type was used, indicating a clear scope of work. 4. The contract duration spanned over five years, from 2008 to 2014. 5. Services were provided to the Department of the Army within the Department of Defense. 6. The contract was firm fixed price, providing cost certainty. 7. The base award amount was $9.18M, with potential for growth.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $18.45M over its period of performance appears reasonable for comprehensive management consulting services supporting a technology directorate. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts within the Department of Defense suggests this award falls within expected ranges for specialized support. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value by capping costs for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This competitive process is expected to drive more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which typically leads to lower prices and better value for the services procured. The open competition ensures that the government is not locked into a single provider, fostering efficiency.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army's Technology Directorate, which received essential management consulting support. Services delivered likely enhanced the efficiency and effectiveness of technology-related initiatives within the directorate. The geographic impact is centered within the Department of Defense, likely supporting operations in Virginia where the contractor is located. The contract supported a professional services workforce, contributing to the specialized consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting various government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks for management and technical consulting services within the Department of Defense often run into the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting plans for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem through this specific contract may be limited unless subcontracting occurred without explicit mention in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

As a definitive contract awarded by the Department of the Army, oversight would typically involve contract officers, program managers, and potentially contracting officer representatives (CORs). Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, management-consulting, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, technology-directorate, virginia, calibre-systems-inc

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.5 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. SUPPORT TO THE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE TAS::21 2020::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-08-15. End: 2014-02-14.

What was the specific nature of the 'Other Management Consulting Services' provided under this contract?

The provided data categorizes the services under NAICS code 541618, 'Other Management Consulting Services.' While the contract title mentions 'SUPPORT TO THE TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE,' the exact nature of the consulting is not detailed. Typically, such services could include strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, program management support, policy development, or advice on technology adoption and integration for the directorate. Without further documentation, the precise deliverables remain unspecified but are understood to be advisory and analytical in nature to enhance the directorate's operations.

How does the $18.45M total contract value compare to similar management consulting contracts within the Department of Defense during the 2008-2014 period?

During the 2008-2014 period, the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded numerous large-scale contracts for management and technical consulting services. An $18.45M definitive contract for support to a technology directorate, awarded via full and open competition, is within the expected range for specialized, multi-year engagements. Larger DoD agencies often award contracts in the tens or hundreds of millions for similar comprehensive support. The firm fixed-price nature and the number of bidders (3) suggest a competitive environment that likely influenced this value, making it a reasonable benchmark for its scope and duration within the DoD's extensive contracting landscape.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of Calibre Systems Inc.'s performance?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Calibre Systems Inc.'s performance. For definitive contracts, especially those involving consulting services, performance is typically assessed against milestones, deliverables, adherence to schedules, quality of reports or recommendations, and overall client satisfaction as documented in performance reports or contract close-out documents. The contracting officer and relevant program managers would have been responsible for monitoring these aspects throughout the contract's life. Without access to the contract's statement of work or performance evaluations, specific KPIs cannot be identified.

Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued during the contract's performance period?

The provided data does not detail any contract modifications or change orders for this contract. Definitive contracts, particularly those spanning several years, often undergo modifications to adjust scope, funding, or timelines based on evolving requirements. The absence of modification data in this summary could mean there were none, or simply that this level of detail was not included in the abbreviated dataset. A thorough review of the contract's official record in systems like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) would be necessary to confirm the presence and nature of any modifications.

What is the historical spending trend for 'Other Management Consulting Services' by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending by the Department of the Army (DA) on 'Other Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541618) has been substantial and generally increasing over the years, reflecting the need for specialized expertise in areas like strategic planning, organizational efficiency, and technology integration. While specific year-over-year figures for the DA alone are not provided here, the broader DoD consistently spends billions annually on professional services, including management consulting. Contracts like the one awarded to Calibre Systems Inc. represent a portion of this significant investment aimed at enhancing operational effectiveness and supporting complex technological advancements within the Army.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W91WAW08R0028

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6354 WALKER LN STE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,910,036

Exercised Options: $18,823,803

Current Obligation: $18,452,453

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-08-15

Current End Date: 2014-02-14

Potential End Date: 2014-02-14 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2022-04-07

More Contracts from Calibre Systems Inc

View all Calibre Systems Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending