DoD's $74M Engineering Services Contract with Engility Corporation Awarded Without Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $74,096,337 ($74.1M)

Contractor: Engility Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-03-14

End Date: 2012-12-23

Contract Duration: 650 days

Daily Burn Rate: $114.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, INTEGRATION, LOGISTICAL STAFF&LIAISON SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $74.1 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, INTEGRATION, LOGISTICAL STAFF&LIAISON SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant spending on engineering and logistical support services. 2. Sole-source award to Engility Corporation raises questions about price discovery. 3. Contract duration of 650 days suggests a substantial, ongoing need. 4. Potential for higher costs due to lack of competitive bidding.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure, combined with a lack of competition, makes it difficult to assess value. Without benchmarks from similar competitively awarded contracts, it's hard to determine if $74 million represents a fair price for the services rendered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no competition. This significantly limits the government's ability to ensure the best possible price and value, as potential savings from competitive bidding were forgone.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium for these services due to the absence of a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Essential support services for Department of Defense operations. Engility Corporation received a substantial contract without facing competition. Lack of transparency in pricing due to sole-source award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Engineering Services, a sector vital for government operations, particularly in defense. Spending benchmarks for this category can vary widely based on complexity and scope, but competitive awards typically drive better pricing.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in subcontracting opportunities for this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure that the Defense Contract Management Agency adequately justified the lack of competition and negotiated the best possible terms.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $74.1 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING, INTEGRATION, LOGISTICAL STAFF&LIAISON SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $74.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-03-14. End: 2012-12-23.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves circumstances where only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent and compelling needs. A thorough review of the contract file would be necessary to ascertain the specific rationale provided by the Department of Defense.

How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure impact potential cost overruns?

A Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. While the fee is fixed, the total cost can vary. This structure can incentivize contractors to control costs to maximize their profit margin, but it also places the risk of cost overruns primarily on the government if not carefully managed and monitored.

What is the potential impact of the lack of competition on the quality of services provided?

While a sole-source award doesn't inherently guarantee lower quality, the absence of competition can reduce the incentive for a contractor to continuously improve service delivery or offer innovative solutions. Without the pressure of competing for future work or facing alternative providers, there's a risk that service quality might stagnate or not meet the highest possible standards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 CONCORD RD STE 400, BILLERICA, MA, 01821

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $92,780,806

Exercised Options: $92,780,806

Current Obligation: $74,096,337

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-03-14

Current End Date: 2012-12-23

Potential End Date: 2012-12-23 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2018-02-14

More Contracts from Engility Corporation

View all Engility Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending