Naval Air Warfare Center Training awards $177M contract for operational training devices, impacting F-18 Hornet readiness
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $91,265,014 ($91.3M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-12-03
End Date: 2010-06-21
Contract Duration: 2,757 days
Daily Burn Rate: $33.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS GOVERNMENT !3750 CENTERVIEW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000039861464!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2AFX!F-18 HORNET !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !N!Z!A!U!M!2!002!B! !Z!N!F! ! !N!B!Y!N! ! !Z! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76011
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $91.3 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS GOVERNMENT !3750 CENTERVIEW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLIN… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $177,153,319, supports operational training devices, crucial for F-18 Hornet pilot proficiency. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, the contract involved multiple bidders, suggesting a competitive price discovery process. 3. The primary risk lies in potential performance issues with the training devices, impacting pilot readiness and training effectiveness. 4. This spending falls within the broader 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector, with specific application in defense training.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $177M for operational training devices appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar defense training system contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive environment likely contributed to achieving a fair market price for the training devices.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds were used efficiently, securing necessary training equipment at a reasonable cost.
Public Impact
Enhances pilot training for the F-18 Hornet, a critical asset for naval aviation. Supports the readiness and combat effectiveness of naval aircrews. Contributes to the technological advancement of military training simulation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for obsolescence of training devices over time.
- Dependence on contractor performance for timely delivery and maintenance.
Positive Signals
- Supports a key defense platform (F-18 Hornet).
- Awarded through competitive bidding.
- Long-term contract duration provides stability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the 'Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing' sector, specifically for operational training devices. Defense training systems often represent a significant investment, with benchmarks varying widely based on technology and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate specific subcontracting efforts with small businesses for this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, specifically the Naval Air Warfare Center Training, is responsible for oversight. The contract's duration and fixed-price award fee structure suggest ongoing monitoring of performance and costs.
Related Government Programs
- Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for technology obsolescence.
- Contractor performance dependency.
- Integration challenges with existing systems.
- Cybersecurity risks associated with training simulators.
Tags
other-commercial-and-service-industry-ma, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $91.3 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER TRAININ!N6133900D0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 COMMUNICATIONS GOVERNMENT !3750 CENTERVIEW DRIVE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000039861464!N!N!000000000000!6930!OPERATIONAL TRAINING DEVICES !C9E!ALL OTHER SUPPLIES AND EQUIPME!2AFX!F-18 HORNET !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $91.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-12-03. End: 2010-06-21.
What is the projected lifespan and upgrade path for these operational training devices to ensure long-term value?
The projected lifespan and upgrade path for these operational training devices are critical for long-term value. Without specific details in the contract, it's assumed the contractor will offer maintenance and potential upgrade services. However, the government should proactively plan for technology refresh cycles to avoid obsolescence and ensure the training remains relevant to evolving F-18 capabilities and threats.
How will the effectiveness of the training devices be measured to ensure they meet pilot proficiency requirements?
The effectiveness of the training devices will likely be measured through a combination of contractor performance metrics and government-led evaluations. This could include tracking simulation fidelity, user feedback from pilots and instructors, and objective measures of skill acquisition and retention. The award fee structure suggests that performance against defined objectives, including training effectiveness, will directly impact contractor compensation.
Are there any identified risks related to the specific technology used in these training devices, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Specific technology risks are not detailed in the provided data. However, common risks for training devices include software integration issues, hardware reliability, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Mitigation strategies typically involve rigorous testing and validation, clear performance specifications, and robust cybersecurity protocols outlined in the contract. The government's oversight role is crucial in identifying and addressing these risks throughout the contract lifecycle.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing › Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: TRAINING AIDS AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE AWARD FEE (M)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DRIVE, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6133900D0032
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-12-03
Current End Date: 2010-06-21
Potential End Date: 2010-06-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-04-08
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $83.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)