Army Reserve Center construction contract awarded to Haskell Company for $34.38M, utilizing full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $34,384,000 ($34.4M)

Contractor: THE Haskell Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-25

End Date: 2027-06-22

Contract Duration: 635 days

Daily Burn Rate: $54.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN/BID/BUILD CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARMY RESERVE CENTER (ARC) TRAINING BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (VMS) AND UNHEATED STORAGE (UHS) ON MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE (MCLB) - ALBANY, GA

Place of Performance

Location: ALBANY, DOUGHERTY County, GEORGIA, 31704

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $34.4 million to THE HASKELL COMPANY for work described as: DESIGN/BID/BUILD CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARMY RESERVE CENTER (ARC) TRAINING BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (VMS) AND UNHEATED STORAGE (UHS) ON MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE (MCLB) - ALBANY, GA Key points: 1. The contract value of $34.38 million represents a significant investment in military infrastructure. 2. Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, Haskell Company. 4. The project duration of 635 days indicates a substantial construction timeline. 5. The project is located at Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, Georgia, supporting regional military readiness. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $34.38 million for a Design/Bid/Build construction project appears within a reasonable range for a facility of this scope. Benchmarking against similar Army Reserve Center or training facility constructions would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is standard for construction projects and aims to control costs, but the final cost is dependent on the contractor's efficiency and material costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. Five bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of interest and competition for this project. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more cost-effective outcomes for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition with multiple bidders is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing the best possible price and quality for the construction services, minimizing the risk of overpayment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army Reserve personnel who will utilize the new training facilities. The project will deliver a new Army Reserve Center (ARC) training building, a Vehicle Maintenance Shop (VMS), and an Unheated Storage (UHS) facility. The geographic impact is concentrated at Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, Georgia, enhancing local military operational capabilities. The construction project will likely create temporary jobs in the construction sector within the Albany, Georgia region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if material prices fluctuate significantly, despite the firm-fixed-price contract.
Schedule delays could impact the readiness and training capabilities of the Army Reserve units.
Ensuring the quality of construction meets military standards and long-term durability requirements.

Positive Signals

The firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition with five bidders suggests a competitive market and potentially good pricing.
The project is located on an existing military installation, potentially streamlining logistical support.
The contractor, Haskell Company, has experience in construction projects, which can mitigate execution risks.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for government facilities, is characterized by large-scale projects requiring specialized expertise. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a segment that includes a wide range of structures from office buildings to training centers. The market size for federal construction is substantial, with significant annual spending allocated to building and infrastructure projects across various agencies. This specific contract contributes to the Department of Defense's ongoing efforts to modernize and maintain its facilities.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. While the primary award went to The Haskell Company, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of small business subcontracting will depend on Haskell Company's procurement practices and the specific requirements outlined in the contract, which are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this project will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, potentially through its Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville, or a similar contracting command. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the project within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is typically maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though detailed project progress and inspection reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Army Reserve Readiness and Training Facilities
Department of Defense Military Construction
Marine Corps Logistics Base Infrastructure Projects
Federal Government Building Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays
Risk of cost overruns for contractor
Quality control during construction
Adequacy of contractor's bonding and insurance

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $34.4 million to THE HASKELL COMPANY. DESIGN/BID/BUILD CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARMY RESERVE CENTER (ARC) TRAINING BUILDING, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SHOP (VMS) AND UNHEATED STORAGE (UHS) ON MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE (MCLB) - ALBANY, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE HASKELL COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $34.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-25. End: 2027-06-22.

What is the track record of The Haskell Company in executing similar federal construction projects?

The Haskell Company has a significant history of executing federal construction projects, including those for the Department of Defense and other government agencies. Their portfolio often includes design-build and construction management services for various facility types. To assess their track record specifically for Army Reserve Centers or similar training facilities, a review of past performance evaluations, contract completion history, and any reported disputes or claims would be necessary. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or agency-specific past performance databases can provide insights into their on-time and on-budget delivery rates for comparable projects. A detailed analysis would involve examining the complexity, scale, and specific requirements of their previous relevant contracts.

How does the awarded price of $34.38 million compare to similar Army Reserve Center construction projects?

Benchmarking this $34.38 million contract against similar Army Reserve Center (ARC) construction projects requires access to detailed cost data for comparable facilities. Factors such as size (square footage), complexity of design, specific functional requirements (e.g., vehicle maintenance shops, specialized training areas), geographic location (affecting labor and material costs), and the year of award all influence pricing. Without specific comparable project data, it's challenging to definitively state if this price represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, given the inclusion of multiple building types (training, maintenance, storage) and the firm-fixed-price nature, the government has established a ceiling cost. A thorough comparison would involve analyzing cost per square foot or cost per functional unit for recently awarded, similar projects.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price construction contract?

The primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, while generally favorable for cost control, lie in potential contractor performance issues. If The Haskell Company underestimates costs, faces unforeseen site conditions, or experiences significant material price escalations beyond what was reasonably anticipated, they bear the financial burden. This could lead to pressure on quality, schedule delays, or contractor default if the losses become too substantial. For the government, risks include ensuring adequate oversight to prevent shortcuts in quality or safety, and managing the potential for change orders if the scope of work needs modification. The government's risk is primarily related to ensuring the contractor has the capacity and expertise to deliver the project as specified within the fixed price.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' strategy likely to be in ensuring value for this project?

The 'full and open competition' strategy is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value in federal contracting. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, it maximizes the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions. The fact that five bids were received indicates a healthy level of market interest. This competitive pressure incentivizes bidders to offer their best prices and terms to win the contract. The effectiveness is further enhanced by a well-defined scope of work and clear evaluation criteria, which allow the government to select the best overall value, not just the lowest price. Continued oversight during contract performance is crucial to ensure the anticipated value is realized.

What are the potential implications of the project's duration (635 days) on military readiness and budget?

A project duration of 635 days (approximately 21 months) for a construction project of this scale has several implications. For military readiness, it means that the Army Reserve units relying on these new facilities will continue to operate with potentially less-than-ideal existing infrastructure for the duration of the construction. Delays beyond this timeline could further postpone the benefits of enhanced training and maintenance capabilities. From a budget perspective, a longer duration can sometimes lead to increased indirect costs for the government (e.g., project oversight) and potential inflation impacts on labor and materials, even within a fixed-price contract, if not managed carefully. Conversely, a well-managed, extended schedule can allow for more thorough construction and quality control, potentially reducing long-term maintenance issues.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912QR24RA036

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 701 SAN MARCO BLVD STE 1400, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32207

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $35,022,000

Exercised Options: $34,384,000

Current Obligation: $34,384,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline