Haskell Company awarded $49.4M for Tyndall AFB facility construction, a firm-fixed-price contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $49,401,229 ($49.4M)

Contractor: THE Haskell Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-05-26

End Date: 2026-01-28

Contract Duration: 1,343 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION OF OSS FACILITY TYNDALL AFB, FL

Place of Performance

Location: PANAMA CITY BEACH, BAY County, FLORIDA, 32407

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $49.4 million to THE HASKELL COMPANY for work described as: CONSTRUCTION OF OSS FACILITY TYNDALL AFB, FL Key points: 1. The contract value of $49.4 million for facility construction appears within a reasonable range for large-scale projects of this nature. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, potentially leading to more predictable final costs. 3. With three bidders, the competition level suggests a moderate degree of market interest, which can influence pricing. 4. The project's duration of 1343 days indicates a significant undertaking requiring substantial contractor resources and management. 5. The contract is for commercial and institutional building construction, a sector with established market rates and benchmarks. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags indicates the primary award was not specifically targeted for small business participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $49.4 million award for the construction of an OSS facility at Tyndall AFB is a substantial investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building projects, particularly those for military installations, suggests this price is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, as it incentivizes the contractor to manage expenses efficiently. While specific per-unit cost data is not available, the overall contract value aligns with the scope of constructing a significant facility.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Three bids were received, suggesting a moderate level of competition for this project. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers generally provide a reasonable basis for price comparison and selection.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, with multiple bidders, is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offer.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and the personnel who will utilize the new OSS facility at Tyndall Air Force Base. The contract will deliver a new operational support facility, crucial for the base's infrastructure and mission readiness. The geographic impact is concentrated at Tyndall AFB in Florida, supporting regional economic activity through construction. The project will likely involve a significant construction workforce, including skilled trades and project management personnel, contributing to local employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions or material price escalations occur, despite the fixed-price nature.
Contractor performance risks associated with managing a large, multi-year construction project of this scale.
Dependency on timely government approvals and site access, which could impact project schedule.
Potential for disputes arising from contract interpretation or change order requests.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type mitigates cost escalation risk for the government.
Full and open competition with multiple bidders suggests a competitive pricing environment.
The contractor, The Haskell Company, likely has experience with large-scale government construction projects.
The project duration is clearly defined, allowing for structured planning and execution.
Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating alignment with military infrastructure needs.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly for institutional and commercial buildings, is a significant part of the federal contracting landscape. This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code (236220). Federal spending in this area supports military readiness, government operations, and infrastructure development. Comparable projects often involve large dollar values and require specialized expertise in project management, engineering, and construction.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses in the provided data. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall value through full and open competition. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether the prime contractor, The Haskell Company, voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Facility Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Department of Defense Construction Contracts
Air Force Base Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for schedule delays
Risk of unforeseen site conditions
Contractor performance risk
Material price escalation (mitigated by FFP)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $49.4 million to THE HASKELL COMPANY. CONSTRUCTION OF OSS FACILITY TYNDALL AFB, FL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE HASKELL COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $49.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-05-26. End: 2026-01-28.

What is The Haskell Company's track record with similar large-scale federal construction contracts?

The Haskell Company has a significant history of federal contracting, particularly within the Department of Defense and for large-scale construction projects. While specific details on past performance for identical 'OSS facility' types are not provided, their experience in constructing institutional and commercial buildings, including military facilities, suggests a relevant background. Analyzing their past contract awards, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any history of disputes or contract modifications would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability for this specific project. Their ability to manage complex projects on time and within budget is a key indicator of their suitability.

How does the $49.4 million contract value compare to similar facility construction projects at military bases?

The $49.4 million contract value for the construction of an OSS facility at Tyndall AFB is substantial, reflecting the scale and complexity typical of military infrastructure projects. Benchmarking against similar projects, such as barracks, training facilities, or administrative buildings at other Air Force bases, would provide context. Factors influencing cost include project size (square footage), specific functional requirements of the OSS facility, site conditions, and prevailing labor and material costs in the Florida region. Without detailed specifications of the facility, a precise comparison is difficult, but the amount is within the expected range for significant new construction on a military installation.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price construction contract?

Despite the firm-fixed-price (FFP) structure, which shifts cost risk to the contractor, several risks remain. The primary risk is contractor non-performance or substandard quality, which could lead to delays and require corrective actions. Unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, hazardous materials) could necessitate change orders, potentially increasing costs if not managed contractually. Material price volatility, though largely borne by the contractor under FFP, could impact their financial stability if extreme. Schedule delays, whether due to contractor issues, government-provided site readiness, or external factors, are also a significant risk, potentially impacting the facility's operational readiness.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' with three bidders in ensuring value for taxpayers?

Full and open competition is generally the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayers, as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders and encourages competitive pricing. In this case, receiving three bids suggests a reasonable level of competition. While more bidders could potentially lead to even lower prices, three offers typically provide sufficient market information for the government to assess price reasonableness and select the best value proposal. The effectiveness is further enhanced by the firm-fixed-price contract type, which locks in costs, and the clear definition of requirements, minimizing ambiguity that could lead to disputes or cost increases.

What is the historical spending trend for facility construction at Tyndall AFB or similar Air Force installations?

Historical spending on facility construction at Tyndall AFB and similar Air Force installations fluctuates based on modernization needs, infrastructure upgrades, and specific mission requirements. Major construction projects, like the one awarded, often follow periods of assessment or are part of larger base development plans. Analyzing past spending data for Tyndall AFB, particularly in the years following significant events (like hurricanes, which have impacted Tyndall), would reveal patterns of investment in rebuilding and upgrading facilities. Comparing this to national Air Force construction spending trends provides broader context on the allocation of resources for infrastructure.

What are the implications of the contract duration (1343 days) on project management and oversight?

A contract duration of 1343 days (approximately 3.7 years) signifies a large-scale, complex construction project. This extended timeline necessitates robust project management from both the contractor and the government oversight team. Key implications include the need for sustained resource allocation, detailed scheduling and progress tracking, and proactive risk management over several years. Oversight will require consistent monitoring of milestones, quality control, and adherence to the schedule and budget. The long duration also increases the potential for changes in requirements, technology, or personnel, requiring flexibility and effective change management processes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W9127820R0021

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 RIVERSIDE AVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $50,653,057

Exercised Options: $49,401,229

Current Obligation: $49,401,229

Actual Outlays: $7,809,032

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline