DoD awards $16.5M contract for airfield structures to Monarch Construction Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,839,720 ($15.8M)
Contractor: Monarch Construction Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-03-27
End Date: 2010-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,465 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200606!600713!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0018 !A!N! !N! ! !20060327!20070911!061629150!061629150!061629150!N!MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !1654 SHERMAN AVE !CINCINNATI !OH!45212!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000014927000!N!N!000014927000!Y129!OTHER AIRFIELD STRUCTURES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!004!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!Y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.8 million to MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: 200606!600713!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0018 !A!N! !N! ! !20060327!20070911!061629150!061629150!061629150!N!MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !1654 SHERMAN AVE !CINCINNATI !OH!45212!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREE… Key points: 1. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 2. Monarch Construction Company, based in Ohio, secured the $16.5M definitive contract. 3. The contract is for 'OTHER AIRFIELD STRUCTURES' and falls under the construction sector. 4. The duration of the contract is 1465 days, with a completion date in March 2010.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $16.5 million for airfield structures is a significant amount. Without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, it's difficult to definitively assess its pricing against similar contracts. However, the fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives fair value for its expenditure.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer money is spent efficiently by fostering a competitive environment for contract awards.
Public Impact
This contract supports infrastructure development at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. The project involves the construction of airfield structures, crucial for military operations. The award to Monarch Construction Company contributes to economic activity within the construction sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen construction challenges arise.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a critical infrastructure project.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Fixed-price contract helps to manage budget predictability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically related to airfield infrastructure. The value of $16.5 million is substantial for a single project of this nature, suggesting a significant scope of work.
Small Business Impact
While the award was made through full and open competition, there is no specific indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if this contract was set aside for small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, Engineer District Louisville, indicating a level of federal oversight. The definitive contract type suggests a clear scope and terms, facilitating accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if contract modifications are frequent.
- Risk associated with construction projects in varying weather conditions.
- Dependence on the financial stability and capacity of Monarch Construction Company.
- Ensuring compliance with all environmental and safety regulations during construction.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, oh, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.8 million to MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. 200606!600713!2100!W912QR!USA ENGINEER DIST LOUISVILLE !W912QR06C0018 !A!N! !N! ! !20060327!20070911!061629150!061629150!061629150!N!MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY !1654 SHERMAN AVE !CINCINNATI !OH!45212!86660!057!39!WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB!GREENE !OHIO !+000014927000!N!N!000014927000!Y129!OTHER AIRFIELD STRUCTURES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !236220!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-03-27. End: 2010-03-31.
What specific airfield structures are included in this contract, and how do their estimated costs compare to industry benchmarks?
The data specifies 'OTHER AIRFIELD STRUCTURES' but lacks granular detail on the exact components. A thorough analysis would require examining the contract's statement of work to identify specific structures (e.g., hangars, control towers, runways) and then comparing their estimated costs against industry benchmarks for similar construction projects, considering factors like location, materials, and complexity to assess value.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will Monarch Construction Company's performance be measured?
Performance measurement for this contract would typically involve tracking adherence to the schedule, quality of construction, safety compliance, and adherence to the fixed-price budget. The Department of Defense would likely have established KPIs related to project milestones, defect rates, and timely completion, with regular progress reports and inspections to ensure accountability.
What is the long-term impact of these airfield structures on the operational efficiency and readiness of Wright Patterson Air Force Base?
The long-term impact hinges on the specific functionality of the 'OTHER AIRFIELD STRUCTURES.' If they enhance aircraft maintenance, storage, or operational capabilities, they could significantly improve efficiency and readiness. Conversely, if they are for ancillary support, the impact might be less direct but still contribute to overall base functionality and modernization efforts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1654 SHERMAN AVE, CINCINNATI, OH, 45212
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-03-27
Current End Date: 2010-03-31
Potential End Date: 2010-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-07-14
More Contracts from Monarch Construction Company
- Federal Contract — $76.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $17.5M (Department of Defense)
- Construct Annex 2 Additions AT the U.S. EPA A.W. Breidenbach Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio — $14.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)