DOD awards $76.8M contract for Commercial Building Construction to Monarch Construction Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $76,858,920 ($76.9M)
Contractor: Monarch Construction Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-31
End Date: 2011-08-31
Contract Duration: 2,191 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $76.9 million to MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded for commercial and institutional building construction. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is 2191 days. 4. The award amount is $76,858,920.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $76.8M for commercial and institutional building construction appears to be within a reasonable range for a contract of this duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is expected to yield fair pricing, maximizing taxpayer value for the construction services procured.
Public Impact
Supports infrastructure development within the Department of Defense. Provides construction services that may impact military readiness or base operations. Creates jobs and economic activity through construction work.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (2191 days) may introduce risks related to cost escalation and changing requirements.
- Lack of specific details on the project scope makes it difficult to fully assess value.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on government infrastructure needs and economic conditions. Benchmarks for similar large-scale construction projects are essential for a comprehensive analysis.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract did not involve small business participation (sb: false). Further investigation would be needed to determine if opportunities were overlooked or if the project scope was not conducive to small business involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Standard oversight mechanisms for large construction contracts would apply, including project management and quality assurance.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- No small business participation.
- Lack of detailed project scope information.
- Potential for cost escalation over the contract's life, despite fixed price.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, oh, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $76.9 million to MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $76.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-31. End: 2011-08-31.
What specific types of commercial and institutional buildings were constructed under this contract, and did the final product meet the intended operational needs?
The provided data lacks specifics on the types of buildings constructed. To assess value, details on the project scope, including the number and purpose of buildings, are crucial. Understanding if the completed structures effectively supported the Department of the Army's operational requirements is key to evaluating the contract's success beyond the financial outlay.
Given the 6-year duration, what mechanisms were in place to manage potential cost overruns or scope creep, and how effective were they?
The firm fixed price contract structure inherently limits the government's exposure to cost overruns, shifting that risk to the contractor. However, for a contract spanning six years, mechanisms for managing scope changes and ensuring contractor performance against evolving needs are vital. The effectiveness of these oversight processes would determine if the project remained within budget and met its objectives despite the long timeline.
How did the pricing of this contract compare to other similar large-scale construction projects awarded by the government during the same period?
A direct comparison of this contract's pricing to similar projects is not possible with the given data. A thorough analysis would require benchmarking against contracts for comparable building types, sizes, and geographical locations. This would help ascertain if the $76.8M award represented competitive market pricing or if there were potential areas for cost savings in future procurements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1654 SHERMAN AVE, CINCINNATI, OH, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-31
Current End Date: 2011-08-31
Potential End Date: 2011-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-05-27
More Contracts from Monarch Construction Company
- Federal Contract — $17.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200606!600713!2100!w912qr!usa Engineer Dist Louisville !w912qr06c0018 !A!N! !N! ! !20060327!20070911!061629150!061629150!061629150!n!monarch Construction Company !1654 Sherman AVE !cincinnati !oh!45212!86660!057!39!wright Patterson Afb!greene !ohio !+000014927000!n!n!000014927000!y129!other Airfield Structures !C2 !construction !000 !NOT Discernable !236220!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!j!2!004!b! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $15.8M (Department of Defense)
- Construct Annex 2 Additions AT the U.S. EPA A.W. Breidenbach Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio — $14.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)