Army contract for facility construction awarded to Hill Brothers Construction for $10.96M, completed in 2008
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,964,856 ($11.0M)
Contractor: Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-02-27
End Date: 2008-01-22
Contract Duration: 694 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200606!601236!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0110 !A!N! !N! ! !20060227!20060515!089543797!089543797!089543797!N!HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO!20831 HIGHWAY 15 !FALKNER !MS!38629!55000!071!22!NEW ORLEANS !ORLEANS !LOUISIANA !+000010994800!N!N!000010994800!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZBC !BRAC !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!007!B! !D!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !C!Z!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! ! !96CE!W912P8!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: NEW ORLEANS, ORLEANS County, LOUISIANA, 70122
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.0 million to HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. for work described as: 200606!601236!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0110 !A!N! !N! ! !20060227!20060515!089543797!089543797!089543797!N!HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO!20831 HIGHWAY 15 !FALKNER !MS!38629!55000!071!22!NEW ORLEANS !ORLE… Key points: 1. Contract value of $10.96M suggests a significant construction project. 2. Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a defense-related infrastructure need. 3. Completed in 2008, providing historical performance data. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 237990 points to heavy civil engineering construction. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 6. The contract type was a definitive contract, typically used for substantial projects.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.96 million for heavy civil engineering construction appears reasonable for a project of this nature, especially considering it was awarded by the Department of the Army. Without specific details on the scope of work, direct comparisons are challenging. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor assumed a significant portion of the cost risk. The award amount is within the expected range for large-scale construction projects managed by federal agencies.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 7 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this project. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and can result in more favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition for this contract likely resulted in a more competitive bid environment, potentially saving taxpayer dollars compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary of this contract was the Department of the Army, which received the constructed facilities. The services delivered involved heavy civil engineering construction, likely for infrastructure supporting military operations. The geographic impact was concentrated in Louisiana, where the project was executed. The contract supported the construction workforce, including skilled laborers and tradespeople in the Falkner, MS area and potentially broader Louisiana region.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract did not adequately account for all project complexities.
- Risk of delays in project completion impacting operational readiness for the Army.
- Quality control concerns inherent in large-scale construction projects.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive pricing environment.
- Fixed-price contract structure shifts cost risk to the contractor.
- Completed within a reasonable timeframe of 694 days (duration).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, a critical component of the nation's infrastructure. The market for federal construction projects is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense frequently awarding contracts for base improvements, facility construction, and infrastructure upgrades. Benchmarks for similar projects would typically consider factors like square footage, complexity of engineering, and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting plans for small businesses. The award went to Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc., a larger entity. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officer and relevant Army Corps of Engineers district. Accountability measures would include contract performance reviews, milestone tracking, and final acceptance of the work. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
- Department of Defense Facilities Construction
- Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction Projects
- Federal Infrastructure Development
Risk Flags
- Contract completed
- Fixed-price contract
- Full and open competition
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, louisiana, definitive-contract, large-contract, heavy-civil-engineering, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price, completed-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.0 million to HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.. 200606!601236!96CE!W912P8!USA ENGINEER DIST NEW ORLEANS !W912P806C0110 !A!N! !N! ! !20060227!20060515!089543797!089543797!089543797!N!HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO!20831 HIGHWAY 15 !FALKNER !MS!38629!55000!071!22!NEW ORLEANS !ORLEANS !LOUISIANA !+000010994800!N!N!000010994800!Y299!ALL OTHER NON-BUILDING FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZBC !BRAC !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HILL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-02-27. End: 2008-01-22.
What was the specific scope of work for this "Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction" contract?
The provided data indicates the NAICS code 237990, which covers "Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction." This broad category can include projects such as highways, streets, bridges, tunnels, and other infrastructure. Given the awarding agency is the Department of the Army, the project likely involved construction or renovation of facilities, infrastructure, or support systems at a military installation. Specific details regarding the exact nature of the construction (e.g., building a specific type of facility, road construction, utility upgrades) are not present in the abbreviated data and would require accessing the full contract documentation or related reports.
How does the $10.96 million award amount compare to similar Army construction contracts in Louisiana during that period?
Comparing the $10.96 million award to similar Army construction contracts in Louisiana around 2006-2008 requires access to a broader dataset of federal contract awards. However, for a project classified under heavy civil engineering construction, this value suggests a substantial undertaking. The Department of the Army, particularly through the Army Corps of Engineers, manages numerous large-scale construction projects. Without specific project details (e.g., square footage, type of facility, complexity), a precise benchmark is difficult. Generally, projects in the multi-million dollar range are common for significant infrastructure or facility development on military bases.
What were the key performance indicators and any potential issues encountered during the execution of this contract?
The provided data does not contain specific details on key performance indicators (KPIs) or any issues encountered during the contract's execution. Standard KPIs for construction contracts typically include adherence to schedule, budget, quality standards, and safety regulations. Potential issues could range from unforeseen site conditions, material cost fluctuations, labor disputes, or design changes. The fact that the contract was completed and awarded suggests that performance was likely satisfactory, but a thorough review would necessitate examining contract close-out documentation, performance reports, or any associated modifications.
What is the track record of Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Army?
Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, as evidenced by this award. To assess their track record comprehensively, one would need to analyze their complete contract history across various federal agencies. This would involve looking at the number of contracts awarded, their values, types of services rendered, performance ratings (if available), and any instances of disputes or contract terminations. A positive history with the Department of the Army, especially for similar types of construction, would indicate reliability and capability.
Were there any contract modifications or change orders issued for this contract, and what was their impact?
The abbreviated data does not explicitly list contract modifications or change orders. However, for a contract of this duration (694 days) and value, it is common for modifications to occur due to unforeseen circumstances, scope adjustments, or pricing changes. If modifications were issued, they would typically be documented and could impact the final cost and completion date. Analyzing these modifications would provide insight into the contract's flexibility and the contractor's ability to manage changes effectively.
What was the rationale behind the fixed-price contract type for this project?
A fixed-price contract type is generally chosen when the scope and requirements of the project are well-defined, and the risks associated with cost overruns can be reasonably estimated. For a construction project like this, a fixed-price contract (likely Fixed-Price Incentive Fee or Firm-Fixed-Price) would have been selected to provide cost certainty for the government. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs efficiently, as they bear the risk of cost overruns beyond the agreed-upon price, while the government benefits from a predictable expenditure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 7
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 20831 HIGHWAY 15, FALKNER, MS, 38629
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-02-27
Current End Date: 2008-01-22
Potential End Date: 2008-01-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-09-26
More Contracts from Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc.
- Temporary Retaining Structures — $62.6M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $28.6M (Department of Transportation)
- 200412!000736!96ce!w912eq!usa Engineer District Memphis !w912eq04c0020 !A!N! !N! ! !20040916!20070716!089543797!089543797!089543797!n!hill Brothers Construction & E!20831 HWY 15 N !falkner !ms!38629!52076!143!29!new Madrid !NEW Madrid !missouri !+000000100000!n!n!000000000000!z219!maint/Other Conservation & Development Facilities !C2 !construction !000 !* !237110!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!005!a! !D!N!C! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!d!a!a!000!a!c!y! !N! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $13.0M (Department of Defense)
View all Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)