Department of the Army awards $29M for new construction, with J & J Contractors Inc. securing the deal

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,066,776 ($29.1M)

Contractor: J & J Contractors, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-09-27

End Date: 2011-04-25

Contract Duration: 1,306 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Construction

Official Description: NEW CONSTRUCTION, CSMS/FMS

Place of Performance

Location: EAST GREENWICH, KENT County, RHODE ISLAND, 02818

State: Rhode Island Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.1 million to J & J CONTRACTORS, INC. for work described as: NEW CONSTRUCTION, CSMS/FMS Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1306 days indicates a significant, long-term project. 3. The project falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a broad category. 4. The award was made by the Department of the Army, a major federal agency. 5. The contract type is 'Combination (Two or More)', implying a complex scope of work. 6. The contract was awarded in 2007, with completion in 2011, providing historical performance data.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $29 million for new construction over a period of 1306 days (over 3.5 years) appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this scale. Without specific details on the scope of work, location, and complexity, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the award was made under full and open competition, which typically drives more competitive pricing. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction projects by the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of whether the final price represented good value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 2 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this project. While more than two bidders would generally be preferred to ensure the most competitive pricing, a full and open process is a positive sign for price discovery. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, would offer further insight into the effectiveness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with two bidders, generally leads to better pricing for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition contracts. It ensures that multiple companies have the opportunity to offer their best prices and services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and its personnel, who will utilize the new construction. The services delivered include the design and construction of new facilities, contributing to military infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the area where the construction took place in Rhode Island. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and project managers in the private sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in large-scale construction projects.
Risk of delays due to unforeseen site conditions or material availability.
Ensuring compliance with all building codes and environmental regulations.
Managing contractor performance over a multi-year project lifecycle.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a structured procurement process.
Contract duration suggests a well-defined project scope and planning.
The contractor, J & J CONTRACTORS, INC., has a track record with federal contracts.
The project falls under a standard construction category, implying established industry practices.

Sector Analysis

The Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector is a significant part of the U.S. economy, encompassing a wide range of projects from office buildings to specialized facilities. Federal spending in this sector, particularly by agencies like the Department of Defense, is substantial and often involves large, complex projects requiring specialized expertise. This contract fits within the broader category of federal infrastructure development and facility modernization. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost per square foot for similar government construction projects in the Northeast region during the mid-2000s.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have been set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the 'ss' (small business set-aside) field is also false. This suggests that the contract was competed broadly without specific set-aside provisions. While there is no direct indication of subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data, large federal construction contracts often include clauses requiring a certain percentage of work to be subcontracted to small businesses. The absence of a small business set-aside means that large businesses were likely the primary competitors and recipients of the prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant project management office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, adherence to contract terms, and quality control inspections throughout the construction period. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, where basic information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arose during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction Projects
Department of Defense Facilities Modernization
General Services Administration (GSA) Building Construction
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract awarded in 2007, performance occurred during a period of significant military engagement.
Duration of over 3.5 years indicates a complex project with potential for scope creep or delays.
Limited competition (2 bidders) could suggest potential for higher pricing than a more competitive bid.
Lack of specific performance data makes it difficult to assess contractor success.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.1 million to J & J CONTRACTORS, INC.. NEW CONSTRUCTION, CSMS/FMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & J CONTRACTORS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-27. End: 2011-04-25.

What was the specific nature and scope of the 'NEW CONSTRUCTION' project awarded to J & J CONTRACTORS, INC.?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'NEW CONSTRUCTION, CSMS/FMS' and falls under the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' (NAICS 236220) category. While the exact nature of 'CSMS/FMS' is not detailed, it likely refers to specific facility types or systems managed by the Army. Given the contract value of approximately $29 million and a duration of 1306 days (over 3.5 years), this was a substantial project. It could have involved the construction of new barracks, administrative buildings, training facilities, or support infrastructure. The 'Combination (Two or More)' contract type suggests it may have included design-build elements or multiple phases of work. Further details would require accessing the contract's statement of work or performance reports.

How does the awarded amount of $29 million compare to similar construction projects by the Department of Defense during that period?

Benchmarking the $29 million award requires comparing it to similar Department of Defense (DoD) construction projects initiated around 2007-2008, particularly those in Rhode Island or the Northeast region, and falling under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction NAICS code. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable projects with detailed scope and cost data, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a multi-year, large-scale construction project, $29 million is a significant but not extraordinary sum for the DoD. Factors like project complexity, specific facility requirements (e.g., security, specialized equipment), and prevailing construction costs in the region would influence the benchmark. Generally, the DoD undertakes projects ranging from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars.

What were the key performance indicators and outcomes for J & J CONTRACTORS, INC. on this contract?

The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or outcomes for J & J CONTRACTORS, INC. on this contract. Performance evaluation is typically documented in contract administration files, which are not publicly accessible through this data feed. Key indicators would likely have included adherence to schedule, budget, quality standards, safety regulations, and overall client satisfaction. Post-award performance reports, if available through contract databases or agency records, would detail any issues encountered, corrective actions taken, and the final assessment of the contractor's performance. Without this information, it's impossible to definitively assess their performance on this specific project.

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' by the Department of the Army?

The Department of the Army, as a major component of the DoD, consistently spends significant amounts on 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' (NAICS 236220) to maintain and expand its infrastructure. Historical spending patterns show a continuous need for new facilities, renovations, and upgrades to support military operations, personnel housing, and administrative functions. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on military readiness requirements, base realignment and closure (BRAC) initiatives, and overall defense budgets. The period around 2007-2011, when this contract was active, saw substantial military construction spending driven by ongoing global operations and modernization efforts. Analyzing annual reports and budget documents from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations, Energy & Environment) would provide detailed historical spending trends.

Were there any significant risks identified or mitigation strategies employed during the execution of this contract?

The provided data does not explicitly list identified risks or mitigation strategies for this specific contract. However, for any large-scale construction project awarded in 2007 with a completion date in 2011, common risks would include: unforeseen site conditions (e.g., soil issues, hazardous materials), material cost fluctuations, labor shortages, weather delays, and design changes. Mitigation strategies typically involve thorough site investigations prior to award, contingency planning in the budget, robust contract clauses for managing changes, and proactive project management by the contracting officer's representative (COR). The 'Combination (Two or More)' contract type might also imply risks related to integrating different work components or phases. The contractor's own risk management plan would also be a key factor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W912LD07R0001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: HZE

Contractor Details

Address: 35 MARKET STREET, SUITE 401, LOWELL, MA, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,282,627

Exercised Options: $29,112,627

Current Obligation: $29,066,776

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline