DoD's $369M YOGI 1-7 R&D Contract Awarded Without Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $369,294,929 ($369.3M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-04-12
End Date: 2013-09-30
Contract Duration: 902 days
Daily Burn Rate: $409.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: U437A00 - YOGI 1-7
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $369.3 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: U437A00 - YOGI 1-7 Key points: 1. Significant R&D spending of $369M on a single contract. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery and value. 3. The contract falls within the R&D sector, specifically physical, engineering, and life sciences. 4. Potential for higher costs due to sole-source award.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's value of $369M is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar R&D services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This method limits price discovery and may lead to less favorable pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for the research and development services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for R&D services due to lack of competition. Limited transparency into the justification for a sole-source award. Potential for reduced innovation if alternative solutions were not explored.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus contract type
Positive Signals
- Supports critical R&D for the Department of Defense
Sector Analysis
This contract is in the Research and Development sector, specifically for physical, engineering, and life sciences. Benchmarks for R&D spending vary widely based on the specific research area and complexity.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Oversight should focus on the justification for not competing and ensuring the contractor delivers value for the funds expended.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition.
- Cost-plus contract type can incentivize spending.
- Lack of disclosed domestic awardees raises transparency concerns.
- Long contract duration (902 days) increases risk exposure.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $369.3 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). U437A00 - YOGI 1-7
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $369.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-04-12. End: 2013-09-30.
What was the specific justification for awarding this $369M R&D contract on a sole-source basis?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of available sources. For this contract, the specific rationale provided by the Department of the Army would need to be reviewed to understand why competition was deemed impractical or impossible, and whether it aligns with federal procurement regulations.
How was the fixed fee determined in this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract to ensure fair pricing?
In a CPFF contract, the fixed fee is negotiated separately from the estimated cost. The government would have assessed the contractor's proposed fee based on factors like complexity, risk, and profit expectations. Without competition, the benchmark for this fee is less clear, making it crucial to verify the negotiation process and supporting data used to establish the fee.
What were the key research outcomes or deliverables expected from this $369M contract, and were they achieved?
Understanding the specific research objectives and deliverables is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of this significant investment. A review of the contract's statement of work and final reports would be necessary to determine if the R&D efforts yielded the intended results and provided value to the Department of Defense.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › OTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W912HZ11R0010
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $369,957,576
Exercised Options: $369,957,576
Current Obligation: $369,294,929
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 326
Total Subaward Amount: $206,613,313
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-04-12
Current End Date: 2013-09-30
Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-21
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)