DoD's $29.3M engineering services contract for UAE development area awarded to Stanley Consultants, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $29,349,552 ($29.3M)
Contractor: Stanley Consultants, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-08-02
End Date: 2021-03-31
Contract Duration: 972 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF U.S. DEVELOPMENT AREA - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - PACKAGE 2 DESIGN PACKAGE
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $29.3 million to STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF U.S. DEVELOPMENT AREA - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - PACKAGE 2 DESIGN PACKAGE Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in overseas infrastructure development. 2. Engineering services are critical for the design and planning phases of complex projects. 3. The contract's duration of 972 days indicates a substantial scope of work. 4. Fixed-price contract type suggests a defined cost structure, potentially limiting cost overruns. 5. The award was made under full and open competition, implying a broad search for qualified bidders. 6. The specific geographic focus on the U.A.E. highlights international engagement for defense infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $29.3 million for engineering services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar international engineering contracts for defense infrastructure would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, assuming the initial scope was well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified firms had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is generally expected to yield a fair market price and encourage innovation. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition is a positive sign for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive process, which aims to secure the best value and prevent inflated pricing for essential engineering services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of Defense and its operational capabilities in the U.A.E. The contract delivers essential engineering design services for infrastructure projects. Geographic impact is concentrated in the United Arab Emirates, supporting U.S. strategic interests. Workforce implications include employment for engineers, designers, and project managers, both domestically and potentially locally.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in long-duration international projects.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical design phases could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- The contractor, Stanley Consultants, Inc., likely has a track record in engineering services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader construction and professional services market supporting government infrastructure needs. The market for defense-related engineering services is substantial, driven by ongoing global military presence and modernization efforts. This specific contract contributes to the U.S. government's investment in overseas facilities, aligning with broader trends in international defense spending.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, Stanley Consultants, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant Department of the Army contracting command. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms and performance requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Overseas Military Construction
- Engineering and Technical Services
- International Base Operations Support
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
- Risk of performance issues impacting project timelines.
- Geopolitical risks in the U.A.E. could affect project execution.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, united-arab-emirates, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, international-contract, infrastructure-development, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $29.3 million to STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC.. IGF::CT::IGF U.S. DEVELOPMENT AREA - UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - PACKAGE 2 DESIGN PACKAGE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $29.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-08-02. End: 2021-03-31.
What is Stanley Consultants, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense for similar engineering services?
Stanley Consultants, Inc. has a history of performing engineering and architectural services for various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. While specific details on past performance for similar overseas projects are not provided in this data snippet, their classification under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services) suggests relevant experience. A deeper dive into their contract history with DoD would reveal the scale, complexity, and success rates of their previous engagements, offering a clearer picture of their capabilities and reliability for this specific contract.
How does the $29.3 million contract value compare to similar engineering services contracts for overseas defense projects?
Benchmarking the $29.3 million contract value requires comparing it to similar engineering services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense or other federal agencies for projects in comparable geographic regions or with similar scopes of work. Factors such as the specific type of infrastructure being designed, the duration of the design phase, and the prevailing market rates for engineering talent in the U.A.E. would influence this comparison. Without access to a database of comparable contracts, it's challenging to definitively state if this value is high, low, or average. However, the firm fixed-price nature suggests an effort to establish a clear cost ceiling.
What are the primary risks associated with a firm fixed-price contract for overseas engineering design services?
The primary risk with a firm fixed-price contract for overseas engineering design services lies in the potential for the contractor to underestimate the scope or complexity of the work, leading to reduced profit margins or pressure to cut corners. For the government, the risk is that the fixed price might be inflated to account for potential contractor risks, or that unforeseen issues requiring significant design changes could lead to costly change orders. In an overseas context, geopolitical instability, logistical challenges, and differing regulatory environments can add layers of complexity and risk not typically encountered in domestic projects.
What is the expected program effectiveness and impact of these engineering services on U.S. defense capabilities in the U.A.E.?
The effectiveness of these engineering services is directly tied to the quality and completeness of the designs produced. High-quality designs are crucial for the successful and efficient construction of necessary infrastructure, which in turn supports U.S. defense capabilities in the U.A.E. This could include facilities for troop housing, operational command centers, logistical hubs, or training grounds. The ultimate impact is measured by how well the completed infrastructure meets the operational requirements, enhances force projection, and contributes to regional security objectives. Poor design could lead to construction delays, cost overruns, and facilities that do not meet functional needs.
What have been historical spending patterns for engineering services by the Department of the Army in the U.A.E.?
Historical spending patterns for engineering services by the Department of the Army in the U.A.E. would reveal the frequency and magnitude of such contracts over time. This data would indicate whether this $29.3 million award is an anomaly or part of a consistent investment strategy. Analyzing past spending could highlight trends in the types of engineering services procured, the primary contractors utilized, and the overall budget allocated to infrastructure development in the region. Such analysis is essential for understanding the long-term commitment and strategic importance of U.S. infrastructure projects in the U.A.E.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ARCHITECT-ENGINEER FAR 6.102
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: SC Companies, Inc. (UEI: 139793061)
Address: 225 IOWA AVE, MUSCATINE, IA, 52761
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,383,022
Exercised Options: $29,349,552
Current Obligation: $29,349,552
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912ER14D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-08-02
Current End Date: 2021-03-31
Potential End Date: 2021-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-12
More Contracts from Stanley Consultants, Inc.
- Pfas Eeca and Ntcra Tinker AFB — $40.8M (Department of Defense)
- Lagrange NEW 1200' Lock AE Task Order — $21.3M (Department of Defense)
- Usda Task Order 2.1, A-E Design Services — $17.5M (Department of Defense)
- AE Services LD22 Fish Passage Design — $7.9M (Department of Defense)
- A-E Svcs, NEW Hydrologic Instrumentation Facility — $6.9M (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)