DoD awards $40.8M engineering services contract to Stanley Consultants, Inc. for Tinker AFB

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $40,765,265 ($40.8M)

Contractor: Stanley Consultants, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-09-28

End Date: 2027-09-29

Contract Duration: 1,827 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PFAS EECA AND NTCRA TINKER AFB.

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $40.8 million to STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC. for work described as: PFAS EECA AND NTCRA TINKER AFB. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in infrastructure and environmental services at a key Air Force base. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs, but requires careful monitoring of scope creep. 3. A single award for a multi-year effort suggests a focus on specialized expertise or established performance. 4. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term need for these engineering services. 5. The contract falls within the engineering services sector, crucial for maintaining and upgrading federal facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $40.8 million over five years for engineering services at Tinker AFB appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts for military installations suggests this falls within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty, assuming the scope of work is well-defined. However, without detailed breakdowns of specific services and their associated costs, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified firms were able to bid. The presence of a single award suggests that Stanley Consultants, Inc. was selected as the most advantageous offer based on the evaluation criteria. While full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and potentially lower costs, the specific number of bidders and their proposals are not detailed here. The selection of one firm implies they offered the best overall value.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a competitive bidding process, which typically leads to more favorable pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and the Air Force, ensuring the operational readiness and environmental compliance of Tinker AFB. Services delivered include a broad range of engineering expertise, likely encompassing design, planning, environmental remediation, and construction oversight. The geographic impact is concentrated at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma, supporting its infrastructure and mission. The contract supports a specialized engineering workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs within the engineering and environmental consulting sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in long-term engineering projects, which could increase costs beyond initial estimates.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical services necessitates robust performance monitoring and management.
The firm-fixed-price contract requires careful management to ensure all deliverables are met without cost overruns due to unforeseen issues.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
The contract duration indicates a stable, long-term need, allowing for efficient planning and resource allocation.
Stanley Consultants, Inc. likely possesses specialized expertise required for the complex engineering tasks at Tinker AFB.

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector is a critical component of the federal contracting landscape, supporting infrastructure development, maintenance, and environmental compliance across various agencies. This contract, valued at approximately $40.8 million, falls within the broader category of professional, scientific, and technical services. Comparable spending in this sector often involves large-scale projects for facility upgrades, environmental assessments, and specialized technical support for complex government operations. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms and smaller, specialized consultancies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this prime contract is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, Stanley Consultants, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the engineering services required, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Army at Tinker AFB. Performance will be monitored against the terms of the firm-fixed-price contract, with regular reviews of deliverables and milestones. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Tinker AFB Infrastructure Modernization Projects
Environmental Remediation Services Contracts
Department of Defense Engineering Support Services
Air Force Base Operations and Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

Long-term contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Firm-fixed-price contracts can be susceptible to scope creep if not managed tightly.
Environmental remediation projects can face unforeseen challenges and cost increases.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $40.8 million to STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC.. PFAS EECA AND NTCRA TINKER AFB.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is STANLEY CONSULTANTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $40.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-28. End: 2027-09-29.

What is the specific breakdown of engineering services to be provided under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific breakdown of engineering services. However, given the context of Tinker Air Force Base, these services likely encompass a wide range of activities including architectural and engineering design, environmental assessments and remediation (potentially related to PFAS, as suggested by the 'PFAS EECA AND NTCRA' in the description), construction management, infrastructure planning, and technical consulting. The duration of the contract (over five years) suggests a comprehensive and ongoing need for these services, rather than a single project. Further details would typically be found in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the contract.

How does the awarded amount compare to historical spending on similar engineering services at Tinker AFB?

Without access to historical spending data specifically for engineering services at Tinker AFB, a direct comparison is not possible. However, the $40.8 million award over approximately five years averages to about $8.16 million per year. This figure should be benchmarked against previous contracts for similar scopes of work. Factors such as inflation, changes in regulatory requirements (e.g., environmental standards), and the specific modernization or expansion needs of the base would influence year-over-year spending. A detailed analysis would require reviewing past solicitations and awards for engineering support at this installation.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Stanley Consultants, Inc.'s performance?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided summary. However, for engineering services contracts, common KPIs typically include adherence to project schedules, quality of deliverables (e.g., accuracy of designs, completeness of reports), cost control within the fixed-price framework, responsiveness to client requests, compliance with safety and environmental regulations, and overall client satisfaction. Performance evaluations are crucial, especially for long-term contracts, to ensure the government receives the intended value and services.

What is the track record of Stanley Consultants, Inc. with the Department of Defense?

Stanley Consultants, Inc. has a history of contracting with the Department of Defense and other federal agencies for engineering and architectural services. While specific past performance details for this exact contract are not provided, the company generally has experience in areas such as infrastructure design, environmental engineering, and construction management for government facilities. Their ability to win a full and open competition award of this magnitude suggests a satisfactory track record and demonstrated capability to meet DoD requirements. A deeper dive into their contract history would reveal specific projects and performance ratings.

Are there any specific environmental concerns, such as PFAS, that this contract addresses?

The contract description includes 'PFAS EECA AND NTCRA', which strongly suggests that addressing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) is a significant component of this contract. EECA likely refers to Environmental, Engineering, and Construction Assistance, and NTCRA could relate to Natural Resource Conservation and Recovery Act compliance or similar environmental remediation efforts. Therefore, this contract is likely aimed at assessing, managing, and potentially remediating PFAS contamination at Tinker Air Force Base, aligning with growing federal and military efforts to address these persistent environmental contaminants.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 225 IOWA AVE, MUSCATINE, IA, 52761

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $40,765,265

Exercised Options: $40,765,265

Current Obligation: $40,765,265

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 6

Total Subaward Amount: $31,883,675

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912BV19D0023

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline