DoD's $22.6M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Valiant Government Services LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,664,729 ($22.7M)

Contractor: Valiant Government Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-09-01

End Date: 2023-08-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: HOPKINSVILLE, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42240

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.7 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract provides essential facilities support services, contributing to operational readiness. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 729 days indicates a medium-term commitment for service provision. 4. The fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. Valiant Government Services LLC is the sole awardee for this specific delivery order. 6. The contract is geographically focused on Kentucky (KY).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $22.6 million over approximately two years for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities maintenance and support contracts within the Department of Defense suggests that the pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for value for money. Without specific line-item details, a precise per-unit cost analysis is challenging, but the overall award seems to align with market expectations for comprehensive support services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The data shows 5 bids were received, suggesting a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and encourages contractors to offer their best value propositions to secure the award. The presence of multiple bidders implies that the market has sufficient capacity and interest in providing these services to the Department of the Army.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied to offer the most competitive price and service package. This process helps prevent inflated pricing and promotes a fair market outcome.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, benefits from reliable facilities support services. Services include maintenance, operations, and potentially other facility-related functions essential for military installations in Kentucky. The geographic impact is concentrated in Kentucky, supporting military readiness and operations within the state. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and support services sector, potentially benefiting the local workforce in Kentucky.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically within the Facilities Support Services industry (NAICS code 561210). This sector is characterized by a mix of large, established companies and smaller specialized firms. Government contracts for facilities support are substantial, driven by the extensive real estate and infrastructure needs of federal agencies. This contract represents a portion of the significant federal spending on maintaining and operating government facilities, ensuring operational continuity and safety.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates the awardee is not a small business. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their overall business strategy, which could provide opportunities within the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, quality assurance checks, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, kentucky, medium-value, service-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.7 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-01. End: 2023-08-31.

What is Valiant Government Services LLC's track record with similar federal contracts?

Valiant Government Services LLC has a history of securing and performing on federal contracts, particularly within the facilities support and base operations categories. Their portfolio often includes services such as maintenance, repair, operations, and logistics support for various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Analyzing their past performance ratings, any contract modifications, and the types of services previously rendered can provide insight into their capabilities and reliability. A review of their contract history would reveal if they have successfully managed contracts of similar size and complexity, and whether they have a pattern of meeting performance requirements or facing challenges.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for facilities support services?

The awarded value of $22.6 million for approximately two years of facilities support services needs to be benchmarked against industry standards and similar government contracts. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, groundskeeping, minor repairs), the geographic location (Kentucky), and the size/complexity of the facilities managed are critical for comparison. While the firm fixed-price nature provides cost certainty, a detailed analysis would involve comparing the estimated cost per square foot or per facility managed against publicly available data for similar contracts awarded by the DoD or other federal agencies. Without granular cost breakdowns, a definitive statement on value is difficult, but the competitive bidding process suggests a market-driven price.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential disruptions to facility operations if the contractor fails to perform adequately, cost overruns if the fixed-price contract doesn't account for unforeseen issues (though less likely with FFP), and contractor performance degradation over time. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust performance monitoring by the COR, clear performance standards and metrics within the contract, regular progress meetings, and the government's right to exercise remedies for non-performance. The firm fixed-price structure itself mitigates cost overrun risk for the government. The competitive award process also implies the selection of a contractor deemed capable of managing these risks.

How effective is this contract in ensuring the operational readiness of the facilities it supports?

The effectiveness of this contract in ensuring operational readiness hinges on the contractor's ability to consistently deliver the required facilities support services as per the contract's performance standards. This includes timely maintenance, prompt repairs, and efficient management of facility operations. The Department of the Army's oversight, including performance evaluations and quality assurance, plays a crucial role. If the contractor meets or exceeds performance metrics, operational readiness should be maintained or enhanced. Conversely, any lapses in service could directly impact the readiness of the military installations in Kentucky that rely on these facilities.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services within the Department of the Army in Kentucky?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services within the Department of the Army in Kentucky would involve examining past contracts awarded for similar services in that geographic region. This includes looking at the total amount spent annually, the types of services procured, the duration of contracts, and the contractors who have historically won these awards. Such an analysis could reveal trends in spending, identify key service providers, and provide a baseline for evaluating the current contract's value and necessity. It would also highlight whether spending has been consistent or fluctuating, and if there have been shifts in the types of services prioritized over time.

What is the potential impact of this contract on small businesses in the facilities support sector?

As this contract was awarded under full and open competition and not specifically set aside for small businesses, its direct impact on small business set-asides is nil. However, the prime contractor, Valiant Government Services LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors. The extent of this subcontracting depends on Valiant's business strategy and the specific requirements of the contract. If Valiant actively seeks small business partners, it can provide valuable opportunities for revenue and growth within the small business ecosystem. Conversely, if subcontracting is minimal, the direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award would be limited.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DY16R0104

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Valiant Integrated Services LLC

Address: 101 WALTON WAY, HOPKINSVILLE, KY, 42240

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,664,729

Exercised Options: $22,664,729

Current Obligation: $22,664,729

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $47,250

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY20D0060

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-09-01

Current End Date: 2023-08-31

Potential End Date: 2025-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-05-13

More Contracts from Valiant Government Services LLC

View all Valiant Government Services LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending