Valiant Government Services LLC awarded $21.2M for Fort Carson O&M services under firm-fixed-price contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,220,017 ($21.2M)

Contractor: Valiant Government Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2021-08-01

End Date: 2024-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NEW TASK ORDER O&M SERVICE - FOR FT CARSON

Place of Performance

Location: HOPKINSVILLE, CHRISTIAN County, KENTUCKY, 42240

State: Kentucky Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.2 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC for work described as: NEW TASK ORDER O&M SERVICE - FOR FT CARSON Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days (3 years) suggests a need for sustained operational support. 3. Awarded to Valiant Government Services LLC, a single contractor for this task order. 4. The task order falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category of essential base operations. 5. Geographic location in Kentucky (ST: KY) for a task order supporting Fort Carson operations requires logistical consideration. 6. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Benchmarking against similar Facilities Support Services contracts for Army installations would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value assessment is challenging, but the fixed-price nature mitigates significant cost overrun risk. The total award amount of $21.2 million over three years averages to approximately $7.07 million annually.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, implying that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The Department of the Army utilized this approach to ensure they received the best value from the market for these essential operational services.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of potential solutions, maximizing the efficient use of public funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and personnel stationed at Fort Carson, who will receive essential facilities maintenance and operational support. Services delivered include operations and maintenance (O&M) for facilities, ensuring readiness and functionality of the base. The contract's performance is geographically tied to Fort Carson, Colorado, though the contractor's operational hub is noted in Kentucky. This contract supports a stable operational environment, indirectly impacting the civilian workforce employed at the base and potentially creating opportunities for subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services represent a significant segment of the government contracting market, encompassing a wide range of activities from building maintenance and repair to groundskeeping and utility management. This sector is characterized by numerous small, medium, and large businesses competing for contracts across various federal agencies. The total addressable market for facilities support is substantial, with agencies like the Department of Defense being major consumers due to their extensive real estate holdings. This specific contract fits within the broader trend of outsourcing non-core functions to specialized service providers to ensure operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Valiant Government Services LLC is likely a large business, given the contract value. There is no information on subcontracting plans or performance. The absence of small business set-asides means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract are limited, unless they are part of a larger subcontracting effort by the prime contractor.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by capping the government's financial exposure. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available. Specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction would depend on the nature of any potential issues, with the Department of Defense IG likely having oversight if performance or financial irregularities arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support-services, operations-and-maintenance, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, army-base-support, kentucky, colorado, large-business

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.2 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC. NEW TASK ORDER O&M SERVICE - FOR FT CARSON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-08-01. End: 2024-07-31.

What is the track record of Valiant Government Services LLC in performing similar facilities support contracts for the Department of Defense?

Assessing Valiant Government Services LLC's track record requires a deeper dive into their past performance on similar contracts. While this specific task order is for $21.2 million over three years, understanding their history with firm-fixed-price contracts, their performance ratings on previous Department of Defense (DoD) engagements, and their experience with facilities support services at installations of similar size and complexity is crucial. Information on contract modifications, past disputes, or awards for outstanding performance would provide a more comprehensive view. Without access to the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or similar internal DoD performance data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and effectiveness beyond the basic award information.

How does the annual cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts at other Army installations?

The annual cost for this contract is approximately $7.07 million ($21.2M / 3 years). To benchmark this value, we would need to compare it against contracts for similar scope and scale at other Army installations. Factors such as geographic location (cost of labor and materials), specific services included (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing, janitorial, groundskeeping), size of the installation supported, and the specific contract type (firm-fixed-price vs. cost-plus) are critical for a fair comparison. A higher annual cost might be justified in high-cost-of-living areas or for installations with more complex infrastructure. Conversely, a significantly lower annual cost could indicate better negotiation or a more efficient service provider.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support?

While firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts are generally favored for cost control, risks can still exist. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or service to maintain profitability if the initial price was set too low or if unforeseen issues arise that are not covered by contract contingencies. For the contractor, the risk lies in underestimating costs, leading to reduced profit margins or even losses, which could impact their financial stability and ability to perform. Additionally, scope creep, if not managed through formal contract modifications, can lead to disputes. The geographic distance between the contractor's base and the installation could also introduce logistical risks and potential delays.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' process in ensuring optimal value for taxpayer dollars in this type of service contract?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring optimal value for taxpayer dollars in service contracts like this one. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, the government maximizes the potential for receiving competitive bids, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. This process fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the offer that represents the best overall value, considering both price and non-price factors (like technical approach and past performance, if specified in the solicitation). However, the effectiveness is contingent on the clarity of the solicitation, the fairness of the evaluation process, and the actual number and capability of the bidders who participate.

What are the potential implications of the contractor operating from Kentucky for a contract supporting Fort Carson, Colorado?

The implication of Valiant Government Services LLC operating from Kentucky while servicing Fort Carson in Colorado primarily relates to logistics, response times, and potentially cost. Travel time and costs for personnel, equipment, and materials will likely be higher than if the contractor were based locally or regionally to Fort Carson. This could impact the contractor's ability to respond rapidly to urgent maintenance needs, potentially affecting base operations. The government may have factored these logistical considerations into the contract price, or it could represent a hidden cost if not adequately addressed during bidding. It also raises questions about the location of key personnel and the depth of local resources available to the contractor.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W912DY16R0104

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Valiant Integrated Services LLC

Address: 101 WALTON WAY, HOPKINSVILLE, KY, 42240

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,725,121

Exercised Options: $24,725,121

Current Obligation: $21,220,017

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 7

Total Subaward Amount: $677,728

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912DY20D0060

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-08-01

Current End Date: 2024-07-31

Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-19

More Contracts from Valiant Government Services LLC

View all Valiant Government Services LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending