DoD Awards $25.4M Design/Build Contract for OMA Site Work to Chickasaw Nation Industries
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $25,427,891 ($25.4M)
Contractor: Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-08-23
End Date: 2007-03-15
Contract Duration: 204 days
Daily Burn Rate: $124.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: OMA SITE WORK "DESIGN/BUILD" FOR THE GSA
Place of Performance
Location: FORT RILEY, GEARY County, KANSAS, 66442
State: Kansas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $25.4 million to CHICKASAW NATION INDUSTRIES, INC for work described as: OMA SITE WORK "DESIGN/BUILD" FOR THE GSA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single entity for design and build services. 2. Competition method was full and open, suggesting a broad search for qualified bidders. 3. The contract value is significant, indicating a substantial project scope. 4. The award date is in 2006, with completion in 2007, suggesting a completed project.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $25.4M for site work is substantial. Benchmarking against similar design/build projects for federal agencies would be necessary to assess if this price was competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the best possible price discovery. The number of bids received and the final negotiated price would determine the effectiveness of this competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing competitive pricing.
Public Impact
Project involved site work and construction, impacting federal infrastructure. Award to Chickasaw Nation Industries may have implications for economic development within that entity. The 'design/build' approach can streamline project delivery and potentially reduce costs. The specific location (Kansas) indicates a regional impact for the construction activities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes value assessment difficult.
- Project duration of 204 days seems reasonable for site work, but scope is unclear.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was utilized.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
- Award to a Native American-owned business (Chickasaw Nation Industries).
Sector Analysis
The construction sector, particularly for federal projects, involves significant capital outlay. Benchmarks for similar site work and design/build contracts would provide context for the $25.4M award.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were provided to small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the Department of the Army, suggesting oversight from a major federal agency. The contract type (firm fixed price) and competition method provide some level of accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed scope of work.
- No information on number of bidders.
- No indication of small business subcontracting.
- Project completed in 2007, making current assessment challenging without historical data.
Tags
prefabricated-metal-building-and-compone, department-of-defense, ks, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $25.4 million to CHICKASAW NATION INDUSTRIES, INC. OMA SITE WORK "DESIGN/BUILD" FOR THE GSA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW NATION INDUSTRIES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $25.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-08-23. End: 2007-03-15.
What was the specific scope of 'OMA SITE WORK' and how did it align with the $25.4M cost?
The provided data lacks specifics on the 'OMA SITE WORK' scope. A detailed breakdown of services, materials, and labor included in the $25.4M contract is necessary to evaluate if the cost was justified and represented good value for the government and taxpayers.
What were the key risks associated with this design/build contract, and how were they mitigated?
Potential risks in design/build contracts include scope creep, design errors, and schedule delays. Mitigation strategies would typically involve robust contract management, clear performance metrics, and contingency planning. The firm fixed price suggests risk was largely transferred to the contractor.
How effective was the full and open competition in achieving the best possible price for this project?
While full and open competition is designed to foster competitive pricing, its effectiveness depends on the number of bids received and the market conditions. Without knowing the number of bidders or the bid spread, it's difficult to definitively assess if the best possible price was achieved.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Architectural and Structural Metals Manufacturing › Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W912DQ06R0039
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chickasaw Nation (UEI: 070848361)
Address: 2020 ARLINGTON ST STE 6, ADA, OK, 04
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $31,305,037
Exercised Options: $31,305,037
Current Obligation: $25,427,891
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-08-23
Current End Date: 2007-03-15
Potential End Date: 2007-03-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-07-30
More Contracts from Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc
- 200410!001219!2100!w91248!aca, Fort Campbell !W9124804C0011 !A!N! !N! ! !20040701!20040618!070347435!070347435!070848361!n!chickasaw Nation Industries, I!2020 Arlington !ADA !ok!74820!28468!047!21!fort Campbell !christian !kentucky !+000000349489!n!n!000025270957!z119!maint/Other Administrative & Service Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !* !236220!A!A!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!b!u!j!1!001!n!5a!d!n!c! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !a!b!y!s!n! ! ! !W34GM1!0001! ! — $39.1M (Department of Defense)
- DQ&I — $33.2M (Department of the Interior)
- Bldg 18 FFE Services — $17.5M (Department of Health and Human Services)
View all Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)