Marine Corps awards $22M geospatial data management contract to AECOM Technical Services for on-site support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,965,503 ($22.0M)

Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-18

End Date: 2027-09-18

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FY25 MARINE CORPS INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES (IGI AND S) DATA MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ON-SITE AND FIELD SUPPORT AT MCI-EAST AND MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NC.

Place of Performance

Location: MOBILE, MOBILE County, ALABAMA, 36602

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.0 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: FY25 MARINE CORPS INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES (IGI AND S) DATA MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ON-SITE AND FIELD SUPPORT AT MCI-EAST AND MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NC. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical geospatial data management for Marine Corps installations. 2. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. secured this contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract duration is two years, indicating a need for sustained support. 4. Performance is required on-site at MCI-EAST and MCB Camp Lejeune, NC. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty. 6. This award represents a significant investment in installation readiness and operational efficiency.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $22 million over two years for geospatial data management services appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale installation support and specialized data management indicates that this pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure helps manage cost risks for the government. Further analysis would involve comparing AECOM's proposed labor rates and overhead to industry standards for engineering and technical services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of technical solutions. The government's ability to select from a broad pool of offerors typically leads to better value and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces and ensures the government receives the best possible value for its investment in critical support services.

Public Impact

Marine Corps installations at MCI-EAST and MCB Camp Lejeune will benefit from improved geospatial data management. Services include on-site and field support for critical information systems. Enhanced geospatial data accuracy and accessibility will support operational planning and execution. The contract supports the readiness and infrastructure management of key Marine Corps bases. Potential for local employment opportunities in North Carolina related to technical support services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense installations with geospatial information and data management. The market for geospatial services is robust, driven by government needs for intelligence, planning, and infrastructure management. Comparable spending benchmarks in this sector often involve significant investments in data infrastructure, software, and specialized technical support for large government agencies and military branches.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify a small business set-aside. Therefore, direct benefits to small businesses through this specific award are unlikely unless AECOM Technical Services, Inc. engages them as subcontractors. The company's subcontracting plan, if applicable, would determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and technical representatives within the Department of the Navy/Marine Corps. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for performance against agreed-upon deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight mechanisms like regular audits or Inspector General involvement would depend on established protocols for this type of service.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, marine-corps, installation-support, geospatial-data, data-management, engineering-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, north-carolina, it-services, technical-support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.0 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. FY25 MARINE CORPS INSTALLATION GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION AND SERVICES (IGI AND S) DATA MANAGEMENT SUPPORT ON-SITE AND FIELD SUPPORT AT MCI-EAST AND MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NC.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-18. End: 2027-09-18.

What is AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s track record with similar geospatial data management contracts for the Department of Defense?

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing complex technical and engineering services for the Department of Defense, including geospatial support. While specific details on past geospatial data management contracts of this exact scale and scope are not immediately available in this summary, the company's broader portfolio includes extensive work in areas like infrastructure engineering, environmental services, and IT support for military installations. Their experience often involves managing large datasets, providing technical expertise, and ensuring compliance with government standards. A deeper dive into their contract history, particularly with the Marine Corps or other branches, would reveal the extent of their direct experience in managing installation-level geospatial information systems and field support operations.

How does the $22 million contract value compare to other recent geospatial data management awards for military installations?

The $22 million contract value for two years of geospatial data management support at MCI-EAST and MCB Camp Lejeune is within a typical range for large-scale installation support contracts. Similar awards for comprehensive base operations, IT infrastructure, or specialized technical services for major military installations often fall within the tens of millions of dollars. For instance, contracts covering base-wide IT services, facilities management, or advanced engineering support can range from $10 million to over $100 million depending on the scope, duration, and specific services required. This particular award appears to be a focused effort on geospatial data, suggesting a competitive price point for specialized services within the broader installation support landscape.

What are the primary risks associated with this geospatial data management contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks include data security breaches, inaccuracies in geospatial data leading to operational errors, contractor performance issues, and potential cost overruns if not managed tightly. Mitigation strategies often involve robust cybersecurity protocols mandated by the contract, stringent data quality assurance processes, performance metrics and penalties, and the firm fixed-price contract type which shifts some cost risk to the contractor. Regular performance reviews, clear communication channels, and defined deliverables also help manage performance and scope. The on-site requirement also allows for closer government oversight.

How effective is the firm fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money for this geospatial data management service?

The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money for services like geospatial data management where the scope of work is well-defined. It provides cost certainty for the government, as the contractor is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. This incentivizes the contractor to be efficient and manage their resources effectively. For the government, it simplifies budgeting and reduces the risk of unexpected cost increases. However, it requires a very clear statement of work to avoid disputes or change orders, and the initial price must be set appropriately based on market research and competition.

What is the historical spending trend for geospatial information and services at Marine Corps installations?

Historical spending on geospatial information and services (IGI&S) at Marine Corps installations has likely seen a steady increase over the past decade, driven by advancements in technology and the growing recognition of geospatial data's critical role in military operations, planning, and infrastructure management. While specific aggregate figures for the Marine Corps' IGI&S spending are not provided here, defense-wide investments in geospatial capabilities have been substantial. This includes funding for satellite imagery, GIS software, data analysis, and specialized support personnel. Contracts like this one represent a portion of that broader investment, focusing on the practical application and management of geospatial data at the installation level to ensure operational readiness and efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICESARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W9127823R0037

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 S GRAND AVE, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,301,950

Exercised Options: $21,965,503

Current Obligation: $21,965,503

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W9127825DA001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-18

Current End Date: 2027-09-18

Potential End Date: 2027-09-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-26

More Contracts from AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

View all AECOM Technical Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending