DoD's $90M R&D contract for ML models awarded to ECS Federal, LLC, with 999 task orders
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $89,793,875 ($89.8M)
Contractor: ECS Federal, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-09-29
End Date: 2020-03-27
Contract Duration: 910 days
Daily Burn Rate: $98.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 999
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR PROTOTYPE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS UNDER BROAD AGENGY ANNOUNCEMENT (BAA) SOLICITATION NUMBER W911NF-17-S-0003
Place of Performance
Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22031
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $89.8 million to ECS FEDERAL, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR PROTOTYPE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS UNDER BROAD AGENGY ANNOUNCEMENT (BAA) SOLICITATION NUMBER W911NF-17-S-0003 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for prototype machine learning models, indicating investment in advanced AI capabilities. 2. The contract's duration of 910 days suggests a substantial development and testing phase. 3. Awarded under a Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), typically used for basic and applied research. 4. The definitive contract type implies a commitment to a specific scope of work. 5. The high number of task orders (999) suggests a flexible and adaptable approach to research needs. 6. The contract's value of approximately $90 million represents a significant investment in R&D.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $89.8 million over 910 days for R&D services is difficult to benchmark without specific details on the deliverables and complexity of the machine learning models. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed tightly, as the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee. Comparing this to similar R&D contracts for AI/ML prototypes would require access to more granular data on scope and outcomes.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all eligible responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This approach is generally favored for ensuring the best value is obtained through a competitive process. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition suggests a robust market engagement.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of innovative solutions, potentially leading to better value for the government.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from advancements in machine learning for potential applications in intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Services delivered include the design and implementation of prototype machine learning models. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of Defense's research and development ecosystem. Workforce implications include the employment of researchers, data scientists, and engineers specializing in AI and machine learning.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns with CPFF contract type if not closely monitored.
- Complexity of R&D may lead to scope creep or unmet performance expectations.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a significant R&D initiative.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Focus on advanced technologies like machine learning aligns with modernization goals.
- The use of a BAA is appropriate for exploratory and developmental research.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences (excluding biotechnology). The market for AI and machine learning R&D is rapidly growing, with significant government investment driven by national security and technological advancement priorities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve other DoD contracts for advanced technology prototypes and AI research initiatives.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific award. While the prime contractor is ECS Federal, LLC, the absence of explicit small business set-aside or subcontracting goals in the provided data suggests that opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are part of the supply chain or subcontracted by the prime. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting plans were in place.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. The definitive contract structure and the presence of numerous task orders imply ongoing monitoring of deliverables and expenditures. Transparency is facilitated through contract awards databases, but detailed programmatic oversight information is often internal to the agency.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Research and Development Programs
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Initiatives
- Broad Agency Announcements (BAA) Solicitations
- Prototype Development Contracts
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively.
- Research and Development projects inherently carry technical and schedule risks.
- Limited information on specific deliverables and performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.
Tags
department-of-defense, research-and-development, machine-learning, artificial-intelligence, definitive-contract, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, broad-agency-announcement, prototype-development, ecs-federal-llc, virginia, defense-contract-management-agency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $89.8 million to ECS FEDERAL, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR PROTOTYPE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS UNDER BROAD AGENGY ANNOUNCEMENT (BAA) SOLICITATION NUMBER W911NF-17-S-0003
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ECS FEDERAL, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $89.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-09-29. End: 2020-03-27.
What is the track record of ECS Federal, LLC in delivering similar R&D projects for the Department of Defense?
ECS Federal, LLC has a history of performing various IT and R&D services for the Department of Defense and other federal agencies. While specific details on past machine learning prototype projects are not immediately available from this data alone, their portfolio often includes complex technical solutions. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance evaluations, and specific project outcomes would be necessary to fully assess their track record in delivering advanced AI/ML prototypes. This would involve reviewing contract databases for awards, task orders, and any associated performance metrics or CPARS reports to understand their success rate and capabilities in this specialized R&D area.
How does the value of this contract compare to other DoD investments in AI/ML R&D?
The $89.8 million awarded to ECS Federal, LLC for prototype machine learning models is a significant investment, but its relative scale within the broader DoD AI/ML R&D landscape requires context. The DoD has allocated billions of dollars towards artificial intelligence research and development across various initiatives and programs, including those managed by DARPA, AFRL, and ONR. This contract, awarded under a BAA, likely represents a specific research effort. To compare effectively, one would need to aggregate spending across similar BAA solicitations, specific AI/ML research programs, and other contracts focused on developing foundational AI capabilities or specific applications. The total DoD AI budget and the distribution of funds across different research areas would provide a clearer picture of where this $90 million contract fits.
What are the primary risks associated with this R&D contract, and how are they being mitigated?
Key risks for this R&D contract include technical feasibility (developing effective ML models), scope creep (expanding research beyond initial objectives), schedule delays (protracted development cycles), and potential cost overruns, especially given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure. Mitigation strategies would typically involve rigorous project management, clear definition of milestones and deliverables, regular technical reviews, and close financial oversight by the contracting agency (DCMA). The use of a BAA allows for flexibility, but this also necessitates strong governance to keep the research focused. The contractor's expertise and past performance are also critical risk mitigation factors.
How effective is the Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) solicitation mechanism for procuring advanced R&D like this?
The Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) mechanism is generally considered highly effective for procuring advanced, exploratory, and basic research where the specific outcomes are not fully defined at the outset. It allows agencies to solicit innovative proposals from a wide range of sources, fostering competition and encouraging cutting-edge solutions. For R&D in fields like machine learning, where the technology is rapidly evolving, the BAA's flexibility is crucial. It enables the government to tap into the latest scientific advancements and adapt research directions as new discoveries emerge. The process typically involves a two-step approach: initial proposals followed by specific solicitations for promising concepts, ensuring that funding is directed towards high-potential research.
What is the historical spending pattern for R&D contracts under BAA W911NF-17-S-0003?
The provided data pertains to a single contract awarded under BAA W911NF-17-S-0003. To analyze historical spending patterns for this specific BAA, one would need to access contract award databases to identify all contracts issued against it. This would involve looking for other awards, their values, durations, contractors, and task order counts. Without access to that broader dataset, it's impossible to determine trends, average contract values, or the typical number of awards made under this solicitation. The $89.8 million contract with ECS Federal represents one data point, and a comprehensive analysis would require examining all associated awards to identify patterns in spending, research areas funded, and contractor participation.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: BASIC RESEARCH
Solicitation ID: W911NF17S0003
Offers Received: 999
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2750 PROSPERITY AVE STE 600, FAIRFAX, VA, 22031
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $94,431,921
Exercised Options: $89,974,455
Current Obligation: $89,793,875
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-09-29
Current End Date: 2020-03-27
Potential End Date: 2020-03-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-03-06
More Contracts from ECS Federal, LLC
- Aess 2.0 - Endpoint Protection — $242.7M (Department of Defense)
- Research and Development Effort to Develop Prototypical State-Of-The-Art AI Hardware And/Or Software — $189.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $176.6M (Department of Justice)
- Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation CDM Dashboard Ecosystem — $129.9M (General Services Administration)
- Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation CDM Data Services — $128.8M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)