DoD awards $14.9M contract for building envelope repairs, with 3 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,933,254 ($14.9M)

Contractor: Brice Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-10-09

End Date: 2028-10-08

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PROJECT INCLUDES REPAIR/REPLACE ROOFS ON BUILDINGS B754(HANGAR 7), B3045(WAREHOUSE), AND B597 (GYMNASIUM) AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE FOR A COMPLETE AND USABLE SYSTEM INTENDED TO WITHSTAND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.

Place of Performance

Location: ADAK, ALEUTIANS WEST County, ALASKA, 99546

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.9 million to BRICE SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: PROJECT INCLUDES REPAIR/REPLACE ROOFS ON BUILDINGS B754(HANGAR 7), B3045(WAREHOUSE), AND B597 (GYMNASIUM) AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE FOR A COMPLETE AND USABLE SYSTEM INTENDED TO WITHSTAND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. Key points: 1. The contract focuses on essential building envelope repairs, ensuring operational readiness for critical facilities. 2. A firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating budget overruns. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market for these services. 4. The project duration of 1095 days allows for phased execution and minimizes disruption. 5. The contract is for a single vendor, highlighting the need for specialized construction services. 6. Geographic focus on Alaska indicates specific environmental challenges and requirements for building resilience.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $14.9 million for roof repairs and replacements across three facilities appears reasonable given the scope and location. Benchmarking against similar large-scale commercial and institutional building construction projects in Alaska, which often incur higher material and labor costs due to logistics, suggests the pricing is within expected ranges. The firm-fixed-price contract type further supports value by locking in costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. With three bids received, the competition level suggests a moderately competitive environment. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers are sufficient to provide a basis for price comparison and ensure the government receives a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process, with three bidders, likely resulted in a competitive price for taxpayers, avoiding the premium often associated with sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Military personnel and operations at the Department of Defense facilities in Alaska will benefit from improved infrastructure. The project will deliver essential repairs to Hangar 7, a warehouse, and a gymnasium, ensuring their continued usability. The geographic impact is localized to Alaska, addressing specific regional environmental resilience needs. The contract supports the construction sector workforce in Alaska through direct employment and subcontracting opportunities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen structural issues are discovered beyond the scope of initial repair/replace.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure repairs could lead to delays if the contractor faces performance issues.
Logistical challenges in Alaska could impact project timelines and material availability.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process.
Long-term contract duration allows for planned execution and minimizes disruption.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Spending in this sector supports the maintenance and development of essential facilities across government and private entities. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale construction projects in remote or challenging environments like Alaska often show higher costs due to logistical complexities and specialized labor requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded under full and open competition. While there is no explicit small business set-aside, the prime contractor, Brice Solutions, LLC, may engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities. The impact on the small business ecosystem will depend on the prime contractor's subcontracting plan and the availability of qualified small businesses in Alaska for specialized construction trades.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and project managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is facilitated through the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), which records contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Military Construction Projects
Commercial Building Envelope Services
Alaska Infrastructure Development

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions impacting scope and cost.
Logistical challenges inherent to construction in Alaska.
Contractor performance risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.9 million to BRICE SOLUTIONS, LLC. PROJECT INCLUDES REPAIR/REPLACE ROOFS ON BUILDINGS B754(HANGAR 7), B3045(WAREHOUSE), AND B597 (GYMNASIUM) AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE FOR A COMPLETE AND USABLE SYSTEM INTENDED TO WITHSTAND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRICE SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-09. End: 2028-10-08.

What is the track record of Brice Solutions, LLC in performing similar large-scale construction projects for the federal government?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Brice Solutions, LLC has been awarded multiple contracts, primarily within the construction and facilities maintenance domain. While specific details on the scale and complexity of past projects require deeper analysis, their presence as a recipient of federal awards suggests a level of experience. Further investigation into their past performance ratings, any past performance issues, and the types of agencies they have served would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability for this specific $14.9 million project involving critical building envelope repairs in Alaska.

How does the awarded price of $14.9 million compare to similar building repair contracts in Alaska?

Benchmarking the $14.9 million contract value against similar projects in Alaska is challenging without specific project details (e.g., square footage, specific materials, extent of damage). However, construction costs in Alaska are generally higher than in the continental U.S. due to logistical challenges, transportation of materials, and specialized labor requirements. Given that this contract covers repairs to three distinct facilities (a hangar, warehouse, and gymnasium) and is for a duration of three years, the price appears to be within a reasonable range for the region. A more precise comparison would necessitate access to detailed cost breakdowns and data from comparable projects within the state.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen structural issues discovered during repairs, delays caused by Alaska's challenging weather and logistical environment, and performance issues from the contractor. Mitigation strategies include the firm-fixed-price contract type, which shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor for the defined scope. The three-year duration allows for phased execution, potentially mitigating weather-related delays. The government's oversight, coupled with the contractor's need to maintain a good performance record for future awards, also serves as a mitigation factor. However, the inherent risks of construction in remote locations remain.

What is the expected effectiveness of these repairs in enhancing the long-term resilience of the specified DoD facilities?

The effectiveness of the repairs in enhancing long-term resilience hinges on the thoroughness of the 'repair/replace as needed' scope and the quality of execution. By addressing the building envelope (roofs), the project aims to prevent water intrusion, improve insulation, and protect structural integrity, all critical for environmental resilience in Alaska. If the repairs are comprehensive and utilize durable materials suitable for the harsh climate, they should significantly extend the usable life of the facilities and reduce future maintenance needs. The success will be measured by the sustained performance of the repaired systems and the prevention of further degradation.

How has federal spending on building envelope repairs and construction in Alaska trended over the past five years?

Analyzing the precise trend of federal spending solely on 'building envelope repairs' in Alaska over the past five years requires granular data extraction and analysis beyond the scope of this single contract. However, general trends in federal construction spending in Alaska are influenced by military readiness needs, infrastructure development priorities, and appropriations cycles. Given Alaska's strategic importance and unique environmental challenges, consistent investment in maintaining and upgrading military facilities is expected. Fluctuations would likely correlate with specific modernization initiatives or major repair needs identified across various installations.

What is the significance of the 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' NAICS code in understanding this contract's context?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220, 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction,' is significant as it categorizes the primary industry and type of work being performed. This code signifies that the contract involves the construction of non-residential buildings, including those for commercial, industrial, or institutional purposes, such as the military facilities mentioned. It helps in understanding the market landscape, identifying potential competitors, and benchmarking costs against similar construction projects. This classification ensures that the contract is being procured under the appropriate regulatory and competitive frameworks for this specific type of construction service.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Solicitation ID: W911KB25R0038

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3700 CENTERPOINT DR, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,602,387

Exercised Options: $14,933,254

Current Obligation: $14,933,254

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline